No evidence of a deep shaft with oak platforms has ever been presented. In another thread someone mentioned that a previous outhouse hole may have been found...
Maybe they can fall in and come out smelling like a rose
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No evidence of a deep shaft with oak platforms has ever been presented. In another thread someone mentioned that a previous outhouse hole may have been found...
This it appears is the game plan now.... I do not believe ANYONE involved with making the show still believes that there is treasure buried in the pit. It is now all about spinning out the search for as many TV episodes as they can and sell advertising....The second the money made off the show and future showings..
It's all Schrödinger's cat
This it appears is the game plan now.... I do not believe ANYONE involved with making the show still believes that there is treasure buried in the pit. It is now all about spinning out the search for as many TV episodes as they can and sell advertising....
Sad really... Still the Laginas have answered the mystery. There is NO TREASURE buried at 170+ft in the money pit area. There can be no doubt of this after the pattern drilling this season (If there was doubt before)....
Ha ha... That is true...Actually the only thing they have proven is that "they" didn't find anything....
Then Gary is making it up? He seems to do that a fair bit. His estimate of the piece leads history/age is also unsupported."Brittania Silver" is an alloy of 92.5% silver and 7.5% copper.
"Shibuichi" was an alloy of 25% silver and 75% copper but was unknown outside Japan until the 18th century.
It is also almost black. Not "silvery" at all.
A new theory? The thread title is "Persistent Claims of a Hoax" so what do you mean by a "New Theory"This thread is long running like the seasons, anyone got a new theory?
Then Gary is making it up? He seems to do that a fair bit. His estimate of the piece leads history/age is also unsupported.
They put him forward as an expert based on that he has experience metal detecting. ... His claims in regard to Jewelry seem pretty dubious at best...
A new theory? The thread title is "Persistent Claims of a Hoax" so what do you mean by a "New Theory"
it would seem the choices are a)It is a hoax, or b) is it not a hoax, or c) some parts of it are a hoax and other parts are real... What new theory can be offered?.....
huh... Early reports DO NOT ever report people using a Spanish treasure map.. The earliest searchers were looking for pirate treasure (captain Kidd) http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/oak-island/598796-early-documents-oak-island.html I have no idea what source you are using for this claim... I have never seen any written reports of anyone using a Spanish treasure map....From the start searches were using a copy of a Spanish origin treasure map. They are still using it today. The stories and reports all refer to it up until the 1960s when it was removed from the official story version. You can easily read the reports today.