Crow
Silver Member
- Jan 28, 2005
- 3,695
- 10,316
- Detector(s) used
- ONES THAT GO BEEP! :-)
- Primary Interest:
- Other
Gidday all
Interesting yarn but its hard to narrow down with so much vague information. It could have been possible that two Mexicans involved in the looting of Columbus. During Pancho Villa raid wounded separated from Villa retreating forces and hid in a cave and died or a third person killed the men and never returned a few captured Mexicans was captured after the raids and executed.
The cave must of been with in few miles of Columbus.
There are two hypothesis on the source of this alleged treasure.
1. An opportunistic looting from the Columbus raid
2. Money allegedly given by Villa to a merchant in the town to buy guns and ammunition. The merchant kept the money and in revenge attacked the town burning building and retrieve his money.
There are questions why Villa decided Columbus on American soil? There was no tactical advantage of bring the United States at war with him.
Crow
Interesting yarn but its hard to narrow down with so much vague information. It could have been possible that two Mexicans involved in the looting of Columbus. During Pancho Villa raid wounded separated from Villa retreating forces and hid in a cave and died or a third person killed the men and never returned a few captured Mexicans was captured after the raids and executed.
The cave must of been with in few miles of Columbus.
There are two hypothesis on the source of this alleged treasure.
1. An opportunistic looting from the Columbus raid
2. Money allegedly given by Villa to a merchant in the town to buy guns and ammunition. The merchant kept the money and in revenge attacked the town burning building and retrieve his money.
There are questions why Villa decided Columbus on American soil? There was no tactical advantage of bring the United States at war with him.
Crow