Native Floridian
Bronze Member
- Mar 12, 2012
- 1,211
- 486
- Detector(s) used
- Excal, Sov GT
- Primary Interest:
- Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
None of the money being spent by either side in the 2nd amendment fight would have made a difference here. That money is being spent at a national level.
Schools are funded at the state and local level.
The state comes to you and says we need more money What are you going to say? Sure here you go!
No you are going to say no more money!
Less government means less government. Old schools not having safe rooms is one area where that rubber meets the road. Hard choices have to be made. That the school is old and still standing, never hit by a tornado, defies the logic to spend money to retrofit it. Most taxpayers are going to turn thumbs down on that expense if given the opportunity. That your leaders did it for you, they got your message "No new taxes!"
This post isn't pointed at anyone or any group. Just posted to get the point across that you can't have it both ways. We can't demand lower taxes and less government and then shake our fist when less government hurts us.
Schools are funded at the state and local level.
The state comes to you and says we need more money What are you going to say? Sure here you go!
No you are going to say no more money!
Less government means less government. Old schools not having safe rooms is one area where that rubber meets the road. Hard choices have to be made. That the school is old and still standing, never hit by a tornado, defies the logic to spend money to retrofit it. Most taxpayers are going to turn thumbs down on that expense if given the opportunity. That your leaders did it for you, they got your message "No new taxes!"
This post isn't pointed at anyone or any group. Just posted to get the point across that you can't have it both ways. We can't demand lower taxes and less government and then shake our fist when less government hurts us.
Last edited: