Charlie P. (NY)
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2006
- 13,015
- 17,158
- Detector(s) used
- Minelab Musketeer Advantage Pro w/8" & 10" DD coils/Fisher F75se(Upgraded to LTD2) w/11" DD, 6.5" concentric & 9.5" NEL Sharpshooter DD coils/Sunray FX-1 Probe & F-Point/Black Widows/Rattler headphone
- Primary Interest:
- Metal Detecting
Eagle77 - I would try what Charlie P. had suggested. Although I had read somewhere that tamping the ground could change the matrix of the soil
Yes. Anytime you disturb it you change the "balance". Plowed fields can be a real challange (but often very worth the bother).
Ever dug a coin, refilled the hole, then swept it again before moving on only to find a second and deeper coin? Happens all the time to me. And that's shooting through freshly disturbed soil. Still works, but is not the best of medium. If you can hit a known target in the same soil you'll be hunting you will hit deeper with undisturbed coins.
The iron/trash masking or overlying coins is a BIG problem. Some detectors purposely "null out" over iron when in discrimination mode and that built-in mask overcomes even a strong coin signal. Good concept but flawed in the real world. Right up there with the "automatic" ground balances that are actually fixed. One new higher-middle-to-lower-upper priced detector - the Fisher F75 - has supposedly overcome this and will find good targets beside or even directly below iron. I'm hoping to get one soon and put this to the test. The cheap solution is to dig the iron and then re-sweep. Takes time and patience, and even a removed iron object leaves a lot of Fe02 behind that messes with the coil's field. But even in those cases there should be many more coins not obscured if the site is loaded.
Lord knows I've been at sites that should have had coins that are duds. I know of two parks within the same township that are three miles apart. One ALWAYS produces and the other has not EVER produced (and I know of two other detectorists who didn't believe me and had identical results. Go figure??