- Aug 19, 2014
- 38,272
- 139,072
- Detector(s) used
- JW 8X-ML X2-VP 585
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
The pit was a big bathroom outhouse ...
Complete with plumbing :P
Complete with plumbing :P
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People fide hutton off but the guy is switched on. His not doing it for the money or fame. His just really passionate about this stuff. The sword is just part of tons of other artifacts that come from the area. Is the sword what they say it is. I cant say. But the whole idea of being dismissed by the acedemics. Im not 1 bit suprised. He brings alot to the table and to see the whole picture you need to appreciate both sides. Some are doing it for tv ratings and fame. Others like him are passionate and want the truth brought forward. But none the less he and scott wolter have both come to the same conclusion of Oak Island
Pulitzer is not plugged into anything. He's a shyster. Wolter isn't any better. The sword isn't what he says it is. It's been proven to be modern. You want to know more about the con, start here: Category: Swordgate - Andy White Anthropology
The problem with acedemia is that if there was proof of something happening before the time of the so called original explorers/settlers. It would put a giant line through there right to colonise that place.
You do realize that the French were the first Europeans on site don't you? Oops, almost forgot the Portuguese and Basque.
Cheers, Loki
Here we go lol.
Mate im all for the sword being tested and authenticated. But i firmly beleive the local canadian university would not be the best place or people to do the correct testing. It should have been sent to italy reguardless for proper testing. My link i shared did involve the sword. But it was only a small part of the program. The problem with acedemia is that if there was proof of something happening before the time of the so called original explorers/settlers. It would put a giant line through there right to colonise that place. Which is why anything no matter what it is or not that doesnt fit that time period is ignored or chastised. If the show is truthful and not biased or perswaded by different parties. The real story will come out and we will all know the truth. A true researcher looks at everything as a whole to get the story. Not have the story then try to make the clues fit into it
The problem with acedemia is that if there was proof of something happening before the time of the so called original explorers/settlers. It would put a giant line through there right to colonise that place
Which is why anything no matter what it is or not that doesnt fit that time period is ignored or chastised.
And as for the whole name bash for the mention of giants. Thats pretty petty. Who is to say they didnt exist at one time. Not 40ft tall like the movie but a race of 6-9ft tall people isnt so out there. Think about it. Do you really think the amount of dinosaur fossils found. Are the only amount of dinosaurs that ever lived. That just woudnt make any sense
The Prof from St. Mary's was perfectly qualified to analyze the sword. Based on it's metallurgy, it isn't a period Roman sword. You don't need to ship it to Italy to figure that out.
How do you figure? The French were in NS first. That didn't stop the British from settling here.
L'Anse aux Meadows proved that line of reasoning wrong. If academia is ignoring goofs like Wolter and Pulitzer it doesn't mean that they are afraid of their 'findings'. It means that Wolter and Pulitzer haven't presented a well thought out case.
If giants did exist at one point, there is no proof of their existence.
The Prof from St. Mary's was perfectly qualified to analyze the sword. Based on it's metallurgy, it isn't a period Roman sword. You don't need to ship it to Italy to figure that out.
Alright we are all getting a bit off topic here. Ill admit that. The sword who knows im no expert. But yes i do beleive we are not being told the full story. Heres a few things to consider.
Australia has the most purest gold in the world. Now if you were to find an ancient gold ring in your back yard. Chances are it would be declared modern because of the purity when in fact it was made here.
2. Lets say you find a gold eqyption artifact in your back yard. Something small hand size. Would you take it to your local egyptoligist (who would know more than egypts own egyptoigists) or would you want the guys in and from egypt to look at it.
If your buying a car do you shop around or take the first one you see. Why take a single oppion with out double checking.
Well as side from visible bones to this day. You just have to look back through all the old news clippings. There are hundreds of stories and even photographic proof.
People like to accuse the smithsonian of hiding evidence. I cant say if thats true or not. But when someone claims they find something. Call them they come out. Take his evidence re bury to bones and threaten a long jail stay if they dig them back up. That may not be proof. But id say somethings going on