Nutting or Cupstones vs. Omars

quito

Silver Member
Mar 31, 2008
4,626
4,843
south dakota
Detector(s) used
good eyes
Not saying these were never used, but we see so many of these natural stones on here, I feel it's time to try to get this information to sink into a few skulls around here. There are to many collectors that cannot tell the difference and should learn. There are pictures, descriptions, and good explanations, AND it's short and sweet.

So, lets quit hoping and guessing and learn.

Omarolluk - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cupstone - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DSCN3325.JPGDSCN3323.JPG
 

Upvote 0
Here is my 1 and only and its a artifact made from a natural stone. I find others in the creek that are natural. This was found in a field above the creek at the top of a hill.
 

Attachments

  • SDC11046.JPG
    SDC11046.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 370
Here is my 1 and only and its a artifact made from a natural stone. I find others in the creek that are natural. This was found in a field above the creek at the top of a hill.

Nice cupped stone.

Natural you say huh? I for one didn't know there was any other kind of stone back in those days rock. I bet all your artifacts (except for pottery) was made from natural stone.

I find lots of water polished stones 60 to 80 feet above one creek I hunt. Those Glaciers and floods sure pushed up a lot of material. So, often times hills near creeks contain a lot (not allot) of stones.... Allot is like how much one is going to allow toward someone or something.

Did you look at the links? Have you got a pretty good idea of the difference now?
 

Here's a few of my Pitted Stones and Metates.
 

Attachments

  • 100_6681.jpg
    100_6681.jpg
    84.3 KB · Views: 207
  • 100_6680.jpg
    100_6680.jpg
    78.5 KB · Views: 267
  • 100_6679.jpg
    100_6679.jpg
    79.7 KB · Views: 222
  • 100_6677.jpg
    100_6677.jpg
    102.5 KB · Views: 280
  • 100_6676.jpg
    100_6676.jpg
    89.4 KB · Views: 289
  • 100_6711.jpg
    100_6711.jpg
    59.2 KB · Views: 393
  • 100_6685.jpg
    100_6685.jpg
    77.7 KB · Views: 287
  • 100_6684.jpg
    100_6684.jpg
    72 KB · Views: 333
  • 100_6683.jpg
    100_6683.jpg
    92.5 KB · Views: 326
  • 100_6682.jpg
    100_6682.jpg
    82.5 KB · Views: 314
  • DSC_0009.jpg
    DSC_0009.jpg
    118.6 KB · Views: 214
  • DSC_0011.jpg
    DSC_0011.jpg
    112.7 KB · Views: 332
  • DSC_0004.jpg
    DSC_0004.jpg
    107.3 KB · Views: 195
  • DSC_0003.jpg
    DSC_0003.jpg
    115.4 KB · Views: 341
  • DSC_0002.jpg
    DSC_0002.jpg
    117.3 KB · Views: 262
  • DSC_0014.jpg
    DSC_0014.jpg
    114.7 KB · Views: 208
  • DSC_0017.jpg
    DSC_0017.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 205
  • 100_7040.jpg
    100_7040.jpg
    109.2 KB · Views: 282
  • 100_7043.jpg
    100_7043.jpg
    105.8 KB · Views: 307
  • 100_7044.jpg
    100_7044.jpg
    106.7 KB · Views: 310
I notice the nutting stones are usually centered on the stone and often the holes on Omar's are often in odd places or not centered.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

So which is this one quito? Made from the same type of rock as the other one I posted but is flat not square. Found in the same area as the other. While you are in the teaching mood :tongue3: It has a depression in the middle but not as deep. Ive never posted this one before. Also what was each type used for? I don't find many of these type of artifacts.
 

Attachments

  • SDC11448.JPG
    SDC11448.JPG
    978.2 KB · Views: 308
Last edited:
So which is this one quito? Made from the same type of rock as the other one I posted but is flat not square. Found in the same area as the other. While you are in the teaching mood :tongue3: It has a depression in the middle but not as deep. Ive never posted this one before. Also what was each type used for? I don't find many of these type of artifacts.

Hey rock, I am always in a teaching mood. :-) Judging from the poor picture, and going by your description, I would say it has done some hammering. It is for sure NOT an Omar. Does it resemble the wear on that excellent example I recently posted a great picture of ?

You sure are asking a lot of me this morning. But I am not going to answer any more of your questions till you answer mine from way back on this thread. What was it you saw to determine hammer stone right out of the chute with those first pictures?
 

Last edited:
Your pictures the rocks with the dents?
 

On mine that I posted I believe it would be considered a grinder or better term a Mano type of tool. It also could of been a small Metate maybe used for herbs it is to small for grinding anything larger. For some reason they liked using the red quartzite stones in the camp site I found these in. I will try and get a better pic of it when I get off of work earlier next week.
 

Your pictures the rocks with the dents?

No, silly me, I should have said earlier in the other thread. You should remember, the natural one that wasn't a hammer or grinder. This one.



paperclip.png
Attached Thumbnails






Sep 09, 2014, 09:58 PM
#2
rock
user-offline.png


gold.gif
us.png




Hammer or Grinder looks polished. Congrats
 

Last edited:
It looks different from the types of rocks I find. It looks polished from holding it or grinding due to the over all color of the stone. Even the chip on the stone shows patina from age. Its the same color as the rest of the stone. I find some that show the brown discoloration but it is from rubbing the stone like a grinder and from years of holding it. The hands have a oil residue that will turn cobbles brown and discolor them. That was my reason. All joking aside I would of carried his rock home with me if I had found it in the creek. Most of the cobbles here have a white to brown cortex but not all one color like his on the outside.
 

WOW! You sure saw a lot of alteration by man in that natural cobble that isn't there. Oh well, carry on.
 

WOW! You sure saw a lot of alteration by man in that natural cobble that isn't there. Oh well, carry on.

I never said I would of kept it I said I would of brought it home. I found some things today but after washing them most went in the trash. I still enjoyed looking either way. Not every rock is a artifact. "Carry On"
 

I never said I would of kept it I said I would of brought it home. I found some things today but after washing them most went in the trash. I still enjoyed looking either way. Not every rock is a artifact. "Carry On"

I know what you said, and I never said you would have kept it. I just said "you saw a lot of alteration by man in that natural cobble that isn't there", body oil staining and all for example.

You wash rocks, then throw then throw the non artifacts in the garbage? I hope your terminology down there is much different than up here.
 

I have no idea what you are talking about
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top