NRA Puts Background Check Senators On Notice

Treasure_Hunter

Administrator
Staff member
Jul 27, 2006
49,427
57,646
Florida
Detector(s) used
Minelab_Equinox_ 800 Minelab_CTX-3030 Minelab_Excal_1000 Minelab_Sovereign_GT Minelab_Safari Minelab_ETrac Whites_Beach_Hunter_ID Fisher_1235_X
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
NRA puts senators who support background checks on notice....



The National Rifle Association has served notice that senators who support the background checks deal struck between Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Pat Toomey (R-PA) will feel the effects on their NRA pro-gun credentials.

In an announced Wednesday evening, the NRA said that it will grade lawmakers’ votes on the final procedural motion and passage of the compromise, according to Talking Points Memo.

After initially indicating that the votes would not count toward the ratings, NRA’s top lobbyist Chris Cox posted a letter to senators online saying the organization “is unequivocally opposed to” the Manchin-Toomey agreement.

“Expanding background checks, at gun shows or elsewhere, will not reduce violent crime or keep our kids safe in their schools,” Cox wrote.”Given the importance of these issues, votes on all anti-gun amendments or proposals will be considered in NRA’s future candidate evaluations.”

The NRA’s decision to score the bill is likely to make it more difficult for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to find the necessary 60 votes to maneuver the bill through the Senate, as noted by TPM.



Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

NRA puts senators who support background checks on notice....



The National Rifle Association has served notice that senators who support the background checks deal struck between Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Pat Toomey (R-PA) will feel the effects on their NRA pro-gun credentials.

In an announced Wednesday evening, the NRA said that it will grade lawmakers’ votes on the final procedural motion and passage of the compromise, according to Talking Points Memo.

After initially indicating that the votes would not count toward the ratings, NRA’s top lobbyist Chris Cox posted a letter to senators online saying the organization “is unequivocally opposed to” the Manchin-Toomey agreement.

“Expanding background checks, at gun shows or elsewhere, will not reduce violent crime or keep our kids safe in their schools,” Cox wrote.”Given the importance of these issues, votes on all anti-gun amendments or proposals will be considered in NRA’s future candidate evaluations.”

The NRA’s decision to score the bill is likely to make it more difficult for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to find the necessary 60 votes to maneuver the bill through the Senate, as noted by TPM.



Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

NRA is making THREATS, now...? WOW!
 

When things go pear shaped....resort to blackmail and threats!....The American way! lol. Nice.
 

If I were a politician I would want nothing to do with the NRA. Anybody remember how well NRA backed politicians did in 2012?

NRA Political Victory Fund: 0.81% Return on Investment ...2012
 

When things go pear shaped....resort to blackmail and threats!....The American way! lol. Nice.

Not blackmail, it is politics, senators and congressmen get a rating from NRA based on their voting record in regards to our rights, if your rating is van A and you vote on a bill that attacks our rights your rating is going to drop and for many that rating is very important due to their voting district makeup.

It is just like a credit rating, screw up your credit score goes down, screw up bad it plummets...This will be like walking off a cliff for the supporters, it will plummet......A to F

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

When things go pear shaped....resort to blackmail and threats!....The American way! lol. Nice.

By the way stop the nation bashing...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

If I were a politician I would want nothing to do with the NRA. Anybody remember how well NRA backed politicians did in 2012?

NRA Political Victory Fund: 0.81% Return on Investment ...2012

But your not a politician.....

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

Not blackmail, it is politics, senators and congressmen get a rating from NRA based on their voting record in regards to our rights, if your rating is van A and you vote on a bill that attacks our rights your rating is going to drop and for many that rating is very important due to their voting district makeup.

It is just like a credit rating, screw up your credit score goes down, screw up bad it plummets...This will be like walking off a cliff for the supporters, it will plummet......A to F

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Funny how you don't think of it as "politics" when the other side is doing it.

Yes, this is all part of our great political process - no extremism, violence, fear, rebellion, succession, etc, etc needed.
 

I never said it wasn't politics, I just don't agree with liberal, socialist politics and when it attacks our rights and freedoms protected by our BoR and Constitution I consider it evil and I will fight against it by ALL means necessary.....

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

I never said it wasn't politics, I just don't agree with liberal, socialist politics and when it attacks our rights and freedoms protected by our BoR and Constitution I consider it evil and I will fight against it by ALL means necessary.....

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

What does that make the 16 republicans who voted in favor?? How about the 3 dems that voted against - they still evil libs??
 

I never said it wasn't politics, I just don't agree with liberal, socialist politics and when it attacks our rights and freedoms protected by our BoR and Constitution I consider it evil and I will fight against it by ALL means necessary.....

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

What about toomey?? A rated by NRA? He evil now? Why do you think he did this? How could the NRA have gotten him so wrong?
 

Same ol' politics. Be it the NRA, Monsanto, or some security contractor--or any of the hundreds of others--it's all about the money. Discussion of "rights" is just a red herring when billions of dollars are at stake.

-Ammo
 

What about toomey?? A rated by NRA? He evil now? Why do you think he did this? How could the NRA have gotten him so wrong?

His A rating just became an F, he is a traitor to the constitution. Watch where his rating goes....


Here is the thing about rights, they're not supposed to be voted on, that's why they are called rights.:banghead:

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

What does that make the 16 republicans who voted in favor?? How about the 3 dems that voted against - they still evil libs??

Traitors.........

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

The simple fact is that our polititions are more concerned with how the appear on the issues, then what they have been elected to do.

The Administration, put the big squeeze on the senate by bussing in the friends and families of gun violence. These people need to have our prayers and thaughts due to what has happened in their lives, but do not have to be used as pawns to push forward an agenda of new laws that usurp the rights of all of us in the Constitution, just to promote a "feel-good" position for all of our elected officials.

I want to think that this movement to debate these issues is nothing more than a mave to make the congress look like they are doing the peoples business, when in fact they are doing nothing but feathering their nest for the next election cycle. Weeks from now when the senate finally votes, I don't think that any new, and unenforceable laws will have been advanced. Any will definatly meet stiff resistence in the House. Our elected officials should start to understand that they were elected to uphold the Constitution, and our rights under said document, and not simply generate sound-bites for re-election. Most of them play this political game with the emotions of the moment, but realize that their are ramifications to not doing their job. Their retirement benefits should be in order, because some will be returning home soon
 

What pisses me off is they get there and they just have to pass more laws.

Don't we already have more laws than our police forces can enforce now?

Rather than going there to make new laws, why not FIRST figure out how to fix whatever the hell is broken with the laws we already have on the freakin books?!

How many times are they going to keep doing the same thing and expecting different results?

That is the very definition of insanity!!!
 

Not blackmail, it is politics, senators and congressmen get a rating from NRA based on their voting record in regards to our rights, if your rating is van A and you vote on a bill that attacks our rights your rating is going to drop and for many that rating is very important due to their voting district makeup.

It is just like a credit rating, screw up your credit score goes down, screw up bad it plummets...This will be like walking off a cliff for the supporters, it will plummet......A to F

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Right. So....it's like a "Universal Background Check" on all politicians to see if they're worthy of representing the gun lobby's view? Interesting concept. I still call it blackmail though! :)
 

Right. So....it's like a "Universal Background Check" on all politicians to see if they're worthy of representing the gun lobby's view? Interesting concept. I still call it blackmail though! :)

No, to see whether they are worthy of OUR VOTE. You don't get one. Sorry . . . NOT!
 

Right. So....it's like a "Universal Background Check" on all politicians to see if they're worthy of representing the gun lobby's view? Interesting concept. I still call it blackmail though! :)

Wrong, see if they do not support the "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed " then they are not worthy of our vote. If someone running for office does not support all of our Constitution and its Bill of Rights they are not even worthy of being an American, much less a leader...
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top