New Beale story

Franklin,
I wouldn't put too much stock in any cipher solution until you have at least a 90-95% properly arranged clear text. The absence of a large volume of repeated codes makes it rather easy to assmble a properly written cipher solution to near 80%, beyond this point they will usually quickly begin to fall apart in the forming of a jumbled, jibberish mess. This I can tell you after having run more then 500 possible solutions through a variety of test and even computer programs, and being in constant contact with people who specialize in this area. In other words, because of the absence of enough repeated code, you can litterally construct a 60 - 70 percent properly arranged solution from just about any subject you wish to draw out of the hat. I have personally seen them as high as 80% that had nothing at all to do with anything relating to the Beale mystery. Not saying your solution is wrong, just saying that you need to reach that 90 - 95% range before you should put too much stock in it, or any solution to any cipher of this type with a similar code arrangement. There are many 60 - 70% cipher solutions out there, and there is a good reason for that, and they can't all be right.
 

I used no cipher solution, just maps and letters. I have no cipher to post.
 

Justintime said:
I used no cipher solution, just maps and letters. I have no cipher to post.

Why can you not shed a little light if you have something so dramatically different from anyone else.

As for bigscoop if there are any other decipherments out there that is about 70 percent correct with the same letters on the same ciphers POST THEM. I do not believe you know of any?
 

Franklin said:
Justintime said:
I used no cipher solution, just maps and letters. I have no cipher to post.

As for bigscoop if there are any other decipherments out there that is about 70 percent correct with the same letters on the same ciphers POST THEM. I do not believe you know of any?

I'll start another thread on the subject so this one doesn't go south on Justintime. :thumbsup: Give me a bit.
 

Franklin said:
Justintime said:
Scoop,
This tread will be remembered for ever. I never ment to stumble upon so much. When I got started, I've never heard of Beale, the story sucked me in. It was going to be a fun adventure at first. It got crazy when I started to see how it all worked. It was divine intervention, forcing me to see. I new to much, I had to try. Each trip I learned more and more. I used every resource I had ,then some, just to see if I was right. Each time, I was right. I knew from the beginning it was more than natural gold ect. When I discovered what was being showed it got serious. The fun adventure is over now. 2012 is the year.

Really Devine intervention? Why can you not even spell correctly? Plus spelling corrections are free on this site if you use them. "I new to much" Should not it be "I knew too much" "This tread" Should it not be "This thread" I have said it before and I will say it again Justintime you have not posted anything NEW to make anyone on this forum or any forum believe you have deciphered anything let alone the Beale Cipher Codes? Here is my proof until I dig the Beale Treasure up:

I don't like to butt in, however, it is usually best to spell correctly when being critical of the spelling of other people. Your misspelled "Devine" is spelled divine. I'll let the grammar and punctuation slide as you did for member Justintime.
 

Thanks Liberty,
 

I have never been good at spelling or writing. Its hard for me to to put in words what's on my mind. I do the best with what I got.
JUSTINTIME :thumbsup:
 

I draw from my minds eye.
 

Attachments

  • 2011-05-14 11.53.08-1.webp
    2011-05-14 11.53.08-1.webp
    45.2 KB · Views: 426
  • 2011-05-14 11.53.08-1.webp
    2011-05-14 11.53.08-1.webp
    45.2 KB · Views: 434
  • 2011-05-14 11.53.08-1.webp
    2011-05-14 11.53.08-1.webp
    45.2 KB · Views: 385
Didn't mean to put two, sorry.. :thumbsup:
 

:thumbsup:
 

Attachments

  • 2011-05-14 11.57.54-1.webp
    2011-05-14 11.57.54-1.webp
    39.1 KB · Views: 368
Wow, I see a lot has been going on with the codes. Please continue.
 

anyone figured out the codes. LOL....
 

If the DOI is the key, a Dunlap Broadside would be easy to count. There is 25 or26 Dunlap broadside that exist, out of 200. The Broadsides very. So , if they very, witch one do you you use. KNOW the KEY, to find the answer. Only one was signed on July 4 1776 , its been Lost. August 2, 1776 everyone signed the written version. But they use the same date July 4,1776, what wrong date. I cant believe they would use the wrong date on that important of a document. Is it a faulty doc. Its a agreement. They all signed around Hancocks name, Time must lapse before Beale could deliver the box to someone chosen. The doi's design was made with treasure in mind. In a few weeks they signed an agreement. Agreed to the terms. LOL.
Just sayn.

Later, Justintime.....;-)
 

If the DOI is the key, a Dunlap Broadside would be easy to count. There is 25 or26 Dunlap broadside that exist, out of 200. The Broadsides very. So , if they very, witch one do you you use. KNOW the KEY, to find the answer. Only one was signed on July 4 1776 , its been Lost. August 2, 1776 everyone signed the written version. But they use the same date July 4,1776, what wrong date. I cant believe they would use the wrong date on that important of a document. Is it a faulty doc. Its a agreement. They all signed around Hancocks name, Time must lapse before Beale could deliver the box to someone chosen. The doi's design was made with treasure in mind. In a few weeks they signed an agreement. Agreed to the terms. LOL.
Just sayn.

Later, Justintime.....;-)

YADDYYADDYYADDY TALKTALKTALKTALKTALK
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom