Need help identifing a tooth

wvdirtdigger

Hero Member
Mar 9, 2013
545
369
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I found this tooth today walking a creek. Any ideas?

image-2238108372.jpg
 

Attachments

  • image-922525620.jpg
    image-922525620.jpg
    74.5 KB · Views: 125
  • image-2443372461.jpg
    image-2443372461.jpg
    72 KB · Views: 119
  • image-3470681705.jpg
    image-3470681705.jpg
    95.6 KB · Views: 134
  • image-1876161634.jpg
    image-1876161634.jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 134
Upvote 0
Cow/calf/heifer molar would be my guess?
Thanks for posting and HH!! Nice find.
BCI
 

He got it.. cow.
Don't ask why I have cow teeth..LOL.


ForumRunner_20130408_201458.png
 

Why do you have cow teeth, Gator?? In FL??
 

There's lots of beef cattle here.
I do alot of fossil hunting and find alot of other things along the way.
 

Yeah they look just like bison. Depending on where you are and the context of the find will matter.
You could even mistake small ones for deer.
 

Yeah they look just like bison. Depending on where you are and the context of the find will matter.
You could even mistake small ones for deer.

Gator, you may be able to answer a question that got tossed at me last week. Are these teeth fossilized? If not, will the enamel ever fossilize?
 

I know, I was just kidding...you should help me pull calves, it's kind of fun, ha!!
There's lots of beef cattle here.
I do alot of fossil hunting and find alot of other things along the way.
 

They are not.
A fossil is actually no longer made of the original material.
A fossil has been replaced by minerals and is more of just a stone in the image of the original.
Those in your photo are not even sub-fossil they are just well preserved old teeth.
Here is a couple fossils I found recently...they are hard as stone and heavy.
One extinct bear lower mandible
And one extinct cousin of the sperm whale tooth.
Hope this helped.
It will probably ...under the right conditions take those teeth in your photo at least 15 thousand years to fossilize.

PART_1365233804434.jpeg



ForumRunner_20130408_210242.png
 

Last edited:
Yeah they look just like bison. Depending on where you are and the context of the find will matter.
You could even mistake small ones for deer.

When I Came Up on it. I was thinking this could be An old buffalo tooth. At least that was what I was hoping LOL. Thanks for the advice!! HH!
 

Yeah they look just like bison. Depending on where you are and the context of the find will matter.
You could even mistake small ones for deer.

I have been hunting a creek that has been said to have had an Indian village on it. I have made several good finds out of this creek. As far as artifacts. Thanks for the help gator boy. H. H.
 

Your welcome.. best of luck to you.
 

There seems to be endless misunderstanding about the term "fossilized."

"Fossilized" (along with "petrified") is a near meaningless term in this specialized forum. The term is often substituted for "mineralized" in describing a bone or tooth. But, fossilized doesn't always equate to mineralized because many fossils are not reinforced or replaced by minerals.

Bone is primarily composed of hydroxyapatite and collagen. Hydroxyapatite is an inorganic compound of calcium, phosphate, and hydroxide which is organized in a crystal latticework that gives bone (and teeth) structural rigidity. It preserves well as a fossil under some conditions.

Collagen is a fiberous protein that serves as connective tissue in bones and muscles. It does not preserve well in a fossil. As collagen decomposes, it may be replaced in the hydroxyapatite latticework by minerals from the depositional environment (e.g. silica dioxide dissolved in groundwater).


Bone reinforced with exogenous minerals is said to be "permineralized." If the bone components (including the hydroxyapatite) are entirely replaced by exogenous minerals such as silica, it is said to be "replaced by -".

A 'burn test' or 'match test' will indicate only whether there is collagen remaining in a bone -- scorched collagen has an awful smell. Teeth - dentin and enamel - contain hydroxyapatite, but don't contain collagen, so the 'burn test' on a tooth would be a waste of time. Dentin may become permineralized over time.

The 'click test' - tapping a putative fossil against your teeth - was a joke that caught on. There are plenty of other things in the environment against which you can click a bone. Don't put the remains of dead, decomposed animals in your mouth.
drool.gif


 

Fossil can also be just an impression..but in its normal functional understanding a fossil bone or tooth "is" mineralized and the cow teeth above are not fossils.
Fossil

ForumRunner_20130409_135504.png

Not fossil...
Both deer teeth.
Very noticeably different in weight..density and composition.

ForumRunner_20130409_135743.png

Its not really necessary for someone to know anything about groundwater,silica, collagen, lattice work or the specifics of the definition to be able to properly call one of these a fossil and the other not.
Just sayin...
 

Last edited:
While I'm here... I might as well show a few recent "fossil" finds.

PART_1365233804434.jpeg
 

Last edited:
ForumRunner_20130409_141548.png



ForumRunner_20130409_141828.png



ForumRunner_20130409_142040.png
 

Attachments

  • ForumRunner_20130409_141410.png
    ForumRunner_20130409_141410.png
    200.2 KB · Views: 86
There seems to be endless misunderstanding about the term "fossilized."

"Fossilized" (along with "petrified") is a near meaningless term in this specialized forum. The term is often substituted for "mineralized" in describing a bone or tooth. But, fossilized doesn't always equate to mineralized because many fossils are not reinforced or replaced by minerals.

Bone is primarily composed of hydroxyapatite and collagen. Hydroxyapatite is an inorganic compound of calcium, phosphate, and hydroxide which is organized in a crystal latticework that gives bone (and teeth) structural rigidity. It preserves well as a fossil under some conditions.

Collagen is a fiberous protein that serves as connective tissue in bones and muscles. It does not preserve well in a fossil. As collagen decomposes, it may be replaced in the hydroxyapatite latticework by minerals from the depositional environment (e.g. silica dioxide dissolved in groundwater).

Bone reinforced with exogenous minerals is said to be "permineralized." If the bone components (including the hydroxyapatite) are entirely replaced by exogenous minerals such as silica, it is said to be "replaced by -".

A 'burn test' or 'match test' will indicate only whether there is collagen remaining in a bone -- scorched collagen has an awful smell. Teeth - dentin and enamel - contain hydroxyapatite, but don't contain collagen, so the 'burn test' on a tooth would be a waste of time. Dentin may become permineralized over time.

The 'click test' - tapping a putative fossil against your teeth - was a joke that caught on. There are plenty of other things in the environment against which you can click a bone. Don't put the remains of dead, decomposed animals in your mouth.

What do you belive the fossil forum should be called....if not the "fossil" forum?
 

Last edited:
Here is some shell inclusions in Flint...also considered fossil by definition.
But definitely different.

ForumRunner_20130409_160344.png
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top