Need help analyzing OKM eXp 6000 pro scan data...

Hello dear friends and experts...
I really need your help in analyzing the scans taken by the OKM eXp 6000 Pro , especially in analyzing the data in 3d visualizer and 3d visualizer studio software.

I am waiting impatiently
Thanks a lot.
In doing an in-depth analyzing of your post request.

Results:
I have found that there's nothing to analyze.
 

I have sent you one of the scan files
 

Attachments

  • 1736629037227.png
    1736629037227.png
    312 bytes · Views: 3
Hello dear friends and experts...I really need your help in analyzing the scans taken by the OKM eXp 6000 Pro...
tn_md.gif
1st - I noticed this was your very first post - so, Welcome Aboard! You didn't list your state (or country) in your profile. So, you might consider jumping over to Sub-Forum: Select Your Area.... for information (i.e., clubs, hunts, finds, legends, maps, etc.) directly related to your state (or country).

tn_moved_over.gif
2nd - I moved ya from HELP! over to BRAND for more exposure.

tn_notice.gif
NOTE: Forum HELP! contains guides tutorials on how to use the new TreasureNet.com software.
 

Hi again,
While thanking the committed and up-to-date administrators and managers of the group- who have made me think that I have an international family- I must say that I have been working with this detector (OKM exp 6000 pro)for several years, but unfortunately, despite the very high quality scan results, I have not been able to have an accurate measurement of the depth and nature of underground targets. I mean, the perception with the unit is accurate, but I am facing many problems in the software analysis.
 

At a cost of $36000 you would think the company would have provided you some personal instruction on the USE of that gadget
 

Hi again,
While thanking the committed and up-to-date administrators and managers of the group- who have made me think that I have an international family- I must say that I have been working with this detector (OKM exp 6000 pro)for several years, but unfortunately, despite the very high quality scan results, I have not been able to have an accurate measurement of the depth and nature of underground targets. I mean, the perception with the unit is accurate, but I am facing many problems in the software analysis.
Have you dug a hole put in a metal object, covered it back up, then scanned it?
 

Have you dug a hole put in a metal object, covered it back up, then scanned it?
If you mean in relation to the proper functioning of this system, no, but due to the homogeneity of the subsurface context, the detection of tunnels and jars containing valuable metals such as gold and silver, etc., is confirmed to me because it is present in their images in my scans. . The main problem is in determining the depth of the desired targets, including tunnels and valuable metals.
for example, see this attached file
 

Attachments

  • jars and tunnels.jpg
    jars and tunnels.jpg
    45.6 KB · Views: 2
At a cost of $36000 you would think the company would have provided you some personal instruction on the USE of that gadget
Unfortunately, I have to say No!
If a detailed analysis of the scans is required, an additional fee must be paid for each scan file😩
 

Unfortunately, I have to say No!
If a detailed analysis of the scans is required, an additional fee must be paid for each scan file😩
are you selling these things or trying to learn how to use one of them, I would just about venture to say you got took, for that much money no way i personally would have ever paid them that kind of money with out them providing some kind of training on it and showed how to read everything.
 

are you selling these things or trying to learn how to use one of them, I would just about venture to say you got took, for that much money no way i personally would have ever paid them that kind of money with out them providing some kind of training on it and showed how to read everything.

I'm just a user having trouble measuring the depth of targets underground
And I just need help in analysis. That's it
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top