My MOST BEAUTIFUL SILVER COIN!! 110 BC Roman Republic Denarius

We should ask to Marc to invent some system for verifying that the votes are real , because I do not think the moderators are anti-Spanish or anything. :dontknow:
I think there is something wrong here ..... I swear to God , I vote for this coin and for the Wolf figurine.
No excuses now there is no European Banner in the window.
But keep trying friend ... :wink:
H
 

I've been trying to understand what it must be like to find a coin that old :dontknow: WOW!!!!! congratulations!

Nutria- you've got my banner vote, for the coin and being so gracious about the whole thing :icon_thumleft:
 

WOW mate :icon_thumleft:, beautiful coin and SO rare, especially for us here :laughing7:. I would have replied sooner but I have been a bit busy :wink:. I don't think most Tnet members will realise just how important this coin is, to find a Roman coin of that age is simply amazing :thumbsup:, Hens teeth and Rocking horse poo come to mind :tongue3:. My oldest coin was only 60 bc, you have beaten me by some way, once again well done ;D. I am voting BANNER for this :hello2:


hammered


PS. Well done Cru'dad, SS and of course Cru for all of your work on identifying this fantastic find :thumbsup:
 

Most surely Banner!!A Roman Republican silver a rare find.The obverse of this coin depicts the personification of Roma(Rome),the reverse is Victory in triaga,Sears #176.C.Pulcher is the momeyer for the year 110BC.This was an elected office in the Republic,a one year term,like all elected officials in the Roman Republic.The Moneyer's name is usually on the reverse of Republican silver.
 

CRUSADER said:
Cru'Dad has been following & researching the Roman's like he does :icon_thumright: He notes that C Pulcher was from one of the 5 most powerful families in Rome at the time:
(for those that are interested, here is some History)

'Then came the elections. The new consuls were C. Claudius Pulcher and Ti. Sempronius Gracchus
The senate then decreed that the provinces which were in a state of war - Sardinia and Histria - should be assigned to the consuls. Two legions were ordered to be raised for Sardinia, each consisting of 5200 infantry and 300 cavalry; the Latin allies were to supply 12,000 infantry and 600 cavalry. In case the consul wished to take ships from the dockyard, ten quinqueremes were placed at his disposal. The same strength of infantry and cavalry was decreed for Histria as for Sardinia. The consuls also received instructions to despatch a force of one legion with its complement of cavalry and 5000 infantry and 250 cavalry from the allies to M. Titinius in Spain.
From there he sent word to his colleague to warn that portion of the new levies which had been raised for service in Histria to assemble at Aquileia, so that nothing might detain him in Rome or prevent him from leaving the City, with due formalities, offering the customary prayers and wearing the paludamentum. His colleague carried out his instructions and ordered the troops to assemble at an early date at Aquileia. Claudius almost overtook his letter. On his arrival he convened the Assembly and laid before it the case of Manlius and Junius. His stay in Rome only lasted three days, and then, in full state with lictors and paludamentum, after offering up prayers in the Capitol, he departed for his province with quite as much precipitancy as before.
A few days before his arrival Junius and Manlius began a determined attack on the town of Nesactium, to which place the chiefs of the Histri, with their king, Aepulo, had retired.
Claudius brought up the two newly-raised legions, and after disbanding the old army with its generals, invested the town and proceeded to attack it with the vineae. There was a river flowing past the town which impeded the assailants and furnished water to the Histrians. After many days' work he diverted this river into a new channel, and the cutting off of their water-supply as though by a miracle greatly alarmed the natives. Even then they had no thought of suing for peace; they made up their minds to murder their women and children, and that this horrid deed might be a spectacle to the enemy, they butchered them openly on the walls and then flung them down. Amidst the shrieks of the women and children and the unspeakable horrors of the massacre, the Romans surmounted the walls and entered the town. When the king heard the terrified cries of those who fled, and understood from the tumult that the place was taken, he stabbed himself that he might not be taken alive. The rest were either killed or made prisoners. This was followed by the storming and destruction of two other towns, Mutila and Faveria. The booty, considering the poverty of the natives, surpassed expectations, and the whole of it was given to the soldiers; 5632 persons were sold as slaves. The prime instigators of the war were scourged and beheaded. The extermination of these three towns and the death of the king led to peace throughout Histria; all the tribes made their submission and gave hostages.

Caius Claudius led his legions into Liguria. The enemy had come down into the plains and was encamped by the river Scultenna. A battle took place there; 15,000 were killed and over 700 were made prisoners, either on the battlefield or in the camp - for this was stormed - and 51 military standards taken. The Ligurians who survived this slaughter fled to the mountains, and no resistance was met with anywhere by the consul as he traversed the level country plundering and devastating their fields. After winning victories over two nations and reducing two provinces to submission during his year of office - a thing which very few have done - Claudius returned to Rome.'

Thanks for that bit of history on Claudius Pulcher. He sounds like he was a Real soldier, a Rommel or Patton of his day; lightning fast strikes and victories. I love military history and Soldiers such as Scipio and Pompey....BUT I may have to add C. Claudius Pulcher to the mental Roledex.
 

The coin is a very good and interesting find no doubt about that :headbang:.
However, voting for banner is more emotional than scientific thing because we are not guided by any criteria in that matter. The market value could provide at least some guidelines because it usually embraces both rarity and condition of an object.
 

Hi Nutria ....need to know the weight of this coin. :icon_scratch: ........Please . :wink:
H
 

Thanks one more time to all of you, I cant say it enough times!!

Hispan the weight its 3,74 grs aprox, my machine its not that good.

Cheers and thanks to all
 

very nice, and historic.
i think the time differace is the problem with the lack of a quick banner, I'm sure many like me are jut getting on the computer after a day at work, them in the garden taking care of the live stock, i little supper and now i get to see this wonderful find.
Mike
 

An amazing find in any context. Thanks for sharing with us :thumbsup:

And a big thank you to Cru' and Cru'Dad for my/our further enlightenment. :icon_thumleft:

I'm voting Banner - maybe it'll be The straw...?
Cheers, Mike
 

Neat piece of history.Love it!
 

THANKS A LOT TO ALL OF YOU TNET FRIENDS!!! :hello2: :hello2:

I´m going out of the country for work for about two weeks, and I will come back to hunt everyday of July ...hehe I hope.

Good luck to everyone!!

Cheers
 

Fantastic find of a lifetime. It must of been a BANNER of a day!!! Arty
 

Cru and Silver:

you crack me up :laughing9:, we all knew at the begining that the denarius was not going to be a banner find...

I now am sure that it's either a gold coin or nothing...no problem it will come sooner or later :icon_pirat:

I wish the time goes by quickly, so we, europeans, can find all those goodies from august on and collapse the banner window...!!!! ;D ;D

Cheers and thanks a lot
 

You have my vote, what a fascinating piece of history. Banner!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top