Most Important Angle

Justawolf

Tenderfoot
Joined
Jan 22, 2025
Messages
8
Reaction score
7
Golden Thread
0
Illustrations attached
"The most important angle in Geometry is 90 degrees, or the fourth part of a circle."
These are the measurements Of Nolan's Cross.
The cross is a special right triangle set to 60 degrees or (30 degrees) angle to latitude.
When lowered 30 degrees to to run parallel with latitude the same measurements can be applied and suspiciously line up with many findings on the island.
90 degrees 90 feet
360 degrees 360 feet

Correlation copy.webp
 

Last edited:
They also suspiciously line up with the survey of 1762 done by Charles Morris. What one cannot do is allege that some ancient treasure depositors knew the heading that Morris would choose for the road across the island in the year prior to the arrival of the New England Planter settlers at OI. Since it cannot be prior to 1762, or after 1762, we are more or less forced to conclude that any surveyed geometry that relates very well to the road across the island is datable and is a feature of the Morris survey.

Updated.webp


Consider the regular nature of the angles in relation to the road heading. The Cross inclination is 50 degrees N of the road and 30 degrees N of the W-E line. The cross' internal angles formed by the stone positions are a nice round 40, 50, 90 degrees exactly. The internal distances between stones on the the Cross are forced by the geometric plan that ties everything to the existence of a 40 degree angle in a scheme that uses Thales' theorem as a framework on paper. This image shows those distances which coincide with what is given to us in ca1982 by Nolan, and then by Amundsen. The line A-M in this image reproduces the lot boundary heading.

Add to this the fact that the Cross stem's heading is that of the great circle to Jerusalem and it is pretty clear that someone planned his choices to make all this come out so elegantly. Who planned, and who surveyed there? Charles Morris. Only he ever knew the heading he chose for the road and lot boundaries. No previous individuals knew those to make a money pit be related to it as perfectly as you allege.

What is Morris giving you? Evidence of his survey. Did he want to signal out a ground cross symbol in relation to Jerusalem? Possibly. Does the Welling pointer point to the exact spot on the horizon the celestial Cross (Northern Cross) sets each and every day at OI's latitude? Yes, it does. Is that just that a coincidence? No. It's particular to the latitude in question. Is there a symbolic possibility in signaling both the Cross and Jerusalem? Yes, there is. Someone may be trying to reclaim that constellation as a Christian symbol, as opposed to a pagan one (Swan=Zeus). This sort of thing would be part of a known effort to Christianize the constellations which traces to Germany. Who might have wanted to do this sort of rebranding? Holy Royal Arch Freemasons who were partial to the idea that observable geometric relations in our world should be counted as evidence of the existence of the Christian God who is coming to save you. Was Morris such a Mason? Yes. How do we know this? He was an original member of Erasmus James Philipps 40th regiment of foot that contained the first Masonic Lodge in British Canada a Annapolis Royal. Between the time Morris charted Mahone Bay for the British in 1751 and the 1763 settlement of the Shoreham grant he had advanced to be Surveyor General of the province. The philosophy attached to the creation of the new British colony a the time (ca1760) was that of raising a God fearing colony of men who would be led by their own self guidance based in the Laws laid oud by God. The entire project reeked of British Protestant Christian exceptionalism which was also closely tied to the elimination of the French Catholic Acadians (1755-1760) and native population which following the treaty of Peace of 1760. Morris, as it turns out, was one of the first who had suggested that the French lands should be surveyed and tuned into townships for New England colonists (prior to 1751). It is his plan that was executed from 1755-60. The plan was always touted to be part of God's plan for England's Empire and Dominion. If there is one thing Haliburton tells us it's that "the Old Judge", aka God, is central to the OI story.
 

They also suspiciously line up with the survey of 1762 done by Charles Morris. What one cannot do is allege that some ancient treasure depositors knew the heading that Morris would choose for the road across the island in the year prior to the arrival of the New England Planter settlers at OI. Since it cannot be prior to 1762, or after 1762, we are more or less forced to conclude that any surveyed geometry that relates very well to the road across the island is datable and is a feature of the Morris survey.

View attachment 2193322

Consider the regular nature of the angles in relation to the road heading. The Cross inclination is 50 degrees N of the road and 30 degrees N of the W-E line. The cross' internal angles formed by the stone positions are a nice round 40, 50, 90 degrees exactly. The internal distances between stones on the the Cross are forced by the geometric plan that ties everything to the existence of a 40 degree angle in a scheme that uses Thales' theorem as a framework on paper. This image shows those distances which coincide with what is given to us in ca1982 by Nolan, and then by Amundsen. The line A-M in this image reproduces the lot boundary heading.

Add to this the fact that the Cross stem's heading is that of the great circle to Jerusalem and it is pretty clear that someone planned his choices to make all this come out so elegantly. Who planned, and who surveyed there? Charles Morris. Only he ever knew the heading he chose for the road and lot boundaries. No previous individuals knew those to make a money pit be related to it as perfectly as you allege.

What is Morris giving you? Evidence of his survey. Did he want to signal out a ground cross symbol in relation to Jerusalem? Possibly. Does the Welling pointer point to the exact spot on the horizon the celestial Cross (Northern Cross) sets each and every day at OI's latitude? Yes, it does. Is that just that a coincidence? No. It's particular to the latitude in question. Is there a symbolic possibility in signaling both the Cross and Jerusalem? Yes, there is. Someone may be trying to reclaim that constellation as a Christian symbol, as opposed to a pagan one (Swan=Zeus). This sort of thing would be part of a known effort to Christianize the constellations which traces to Germany. Who might have wanted to do this sort of rebranding? Holy Royal Arch Freemasons who were partial to the idea that observable geometric relations in our world should be counted as evidence of the existence of the Christian God who is coming to save you. Was Morris such a Mason? Yes. How do we know this? He was an original member of Erasmus James Philipps 40th regiment of foot that contained the first Masonic Lodge in British Canada a Annapolis Royal. Between the time Morris charted Mahone Bay for the British in 1751 and the 1763 settlement of the Shoreham grant he had advanced to be Surveyor General of the province. The philosophy attached to the creation of the new British colony a the time (ca1760) was that of raising a God fearing colony of men who would be led by their own self guidance based in the Laws laid oud by God. The entire project reeked of British Protestant Christian exceptionalism which was also closely tied to the elimination of the French Catholic Acadians (1755-1760) and native population which following the treaty of Peace of 1760. Morris, as it turns out, was one of the first who had suggested that the French lands should be surveyed and tuned into townships for New England colonists (prior to 1751). It is his plan that was executed from 1755-60. The plan was always touted to be part of God's plan for England's Empire and Dominion. If there is one thing Haliburton tells us it's that "the Old Judge", aka God, is central to the OI story.
Does this line up then?
Correlation cross.webp
 

That's not clear enough for me to know what you are trying to show. The image/page seems distorted.

Welling Pointer.webp

I like to show this image because I think it is doing a few things that help us realize how some things are clearly related to Morris's choices. The base of the stem of the Cross sits adjacent to the road, but there is also a point c which makes a radius from it to the head stone position, defining points C2 and C3 on the W-E heading. C2 can be seen to work as a center to define points D and E on a large equilateral triangle. The line D-E is the line given by the Welling triangle pointer. Furthermore if you use that large equilateral triangle as the counterpart to what the Welling Pointer shows you can divide its side in 4:6 exactly as it is given to us. What that works out to is shown at point F. Applying the Welling pointer's depicted geometry to Morris' larger Plan gives us the position of the Welling pointer. The coincidence is rather elegant.

D-E also points to the celestial N where three things set exactly at the horizon each and ever day at 44.51N. One of them is the Norther Cross (in Cygnus), the second is the star Capella in the constellation of Auriga and the third is a minor constellation named Quadrans Muralis that is depicted like this:
quadrans muralis.webp

The three form a near equilateral triangle in the sky that travels around Polaris.
welling pointer.webp


This gives us a triple coincidence of the same motif.
It is impossible that anything which is based on Nolan's cross or the Welling triangle predate Morris' 1762 survey. Keep in mind that the elevation of the Cross from the W-E line gives the Great Circle heading to Jerusalem too. That added element of detail informs us that we're dealing with someone who is executing something that was really only starting to be possible in the late 1750s (a time where longitude precision would allow that).
 

I thank you for your input. I find it fascinating that how many proposed theories are presented about the island and the treasure, that correlate with other theories. The stone triangle even represents on your illustration.
Hopefully the illustrations attached will make the article clearer.
Welling Pointer SSRmap.webp
Just wondering what the yellow dotted line represents on your map?
 

I thank you for your input. I find it fascinating that how many proposed theories are presented about the island and the treasure, that correlate with other theories. The stone triangle even represents on your illustration.
Hopefully the illustrations attached will make the article clearer.
View attachment 2193836Just wondering what the yellow dotted line represents on your map?
That's just the W-E heading from the base of the Cross at the road.

You are tricking yourself by saying that it is amazing that so many theories align. Theories align because they employ the survey as a starting point without even recognizing this was done by Morris. The island wasn't planned and surveyed by Romans! The theories are all being built to incorporate what is there which we can account for historically. The only thing that exists there which we can date exactly is a survey done in 1762. Given that it is possible to fiddle with regular geometry in very elegant ways, it happens that we can produce things that are elegant by being clever about it.

Keep in mind that no one ever gave the Welling pointer before long after 1762 (1880-90s?). That means that everything I show could have been produced using Morris' regular plan to build some suggestion that would seem to fit. We do not know what detail has informed what. It it also possible, given only the heading of the road and the lot boundaries, that Nolan himself could have constructed a cross suggestion that also involved the Welling Pointer which was known to him (as well as the Roper survey). Either the cross came with the road survey or it came after and is used to show a heading that is 30 degrees N of the W-E line. The cross conserves the lot boundary headings within the choices of the distances between the cones in it and a series of regular angles that are in harmony with the regular angles Morris used. It means it is contingent with knowledge of where the road was placed. This is not good news for anyone who thinks this is old or part of a treasure map/riddle.

The base of the cross is immediately adjacent to the road. The vertical from the road to the head stone is the lot boundary heading. The only way you could square that with ancient theories is to say that a later modern survey relates only by dumb luck to Nolan's Cross and other things. We are stuck trying to explain why Morris may have wanted to signal a Great Circle to Jerusalem with a cross which has the equivalent of one above which sets exactly where the Welling pointer points to. If it is not Morris then I have even less hope that we could find an individual who could have done this once the damn island became lived on starting in 1763. Someone would have needed to redo some surveying across various lots that were all owned by different grantees.
 

It was the theories and clues that allowed me to grab a drafting compass, set it to 360 feet at 360 degree radius, with the two main triangles, an isosceles triangle and special right triangle, to coincidentally line up many locations on the island using google maps. Suspiciously more so when using a LIDAR map. As with everything, it's just speculation.
That's just the W-E heading from the base of the Cross at the road.

You are tricking yourself by saying that it is amazing that so many theories align. Theories align because they employ the survey as a starting point without even recognizing this was done by Morris. The island wasn't planned and surveyed by Romans! The theories are all being built to incorporate what is there which we can account for historically. The only thing that exists there which we can date exactly is a survey done in 1762. Given that it is possible to fiddle with regular geometry in very elegant ways, it happens that we can produce things that are elegant by being clever about it.

Keep in mind that no one ever gave the Welling pointer before long after 1762 (1880-90s?). That means that everything I show could have been produced using Morris' regular plan to build some suggestion that would seem to fit. We do not know what detail has informed what. It it also possible, given only the heading of the road and the lot boundaries, that Nolan himself could have constructed a cross suggestion that also involved the Welling Pointer which was known to him (as well as the Roper survey). Either the cross came with the road survey or it came after and is used to show a heading that is 30 degrees N of the W-E line. The cross conserves the lot boundary headings within the choices of the distances between the cones in it and a series of regular angles that are in harmony with the regular angles Morris used. It means it is contingent with knowledge of where the road was placed. This is not good news for anyone who thinks this is old or part of a treasure map/riddle.

The base of the cross is immediately adjacent to the road. The vertical from the road to the head stone is the lot boundary heading. The only way you could square that with ancient theories is to say that a later modern survey relates only by dumb luck to Nolan's Cross and other things. We are stuck trying to explain why Morris may have wanted to signal a Great Circle to Jerusalem with a cross which has the equivalent of one above which sets exactly where the Welling pointer points to. If it is not Morris then I have even less hope that we could find an individual who could have done this once the damn island became lived on starting in 1763. Someone would have needed to redo some surveying across various lots that were all owned by different grantees.
 

As with everything else on oak island it lines up with nothing.
When Morris surveyed OI he also surveyed the Shoreham grant immediately on shore there. The regular gridwork there allows for anyone to align many things by laying down a regular geometry over it. Inside of a square it is easy to build a equilateral triangle, a circle or a golden rectangle by just joining points. Where I think it is interesting is with the choice of the place where the OI story appears. It is not given on any other of the 365 islands in that Bay. It uses the one that has on it 44.51N. That is to say, it does not prefer to use the 44.4N that would have been of use with Hobson's Nose where the original story that inspired the OI one originated in 1830. What we have is a travelling story that may be using its position. 44.51N is an invitation to involve the constellation Cygnus and the Northern Cross in the way it was done much earlier in Italy. 44.4N would have been an invitation to use a Mercator map alignment from Giza through the Pillars of Hercules. That alignment belongs to another story which has ties to John Dee in England in the 1580. The geometry in that tone is upon a plane projection of the globe. Anyone with any degree of cleverness could have fished from a least those two factoids to craft their mystery suggestion.
 

When Morris surveyed OI he also surveyed the Shoreham grant immediately on shore there. The regular gridwork there allows for anyone to align many things by laying down a regular geometry over it. Inside of a square it is easy to build a equilateral triangle, a circle or a golden rectangle by just joining points. Where I think it is interesting is with the choice of the place where the OI story appears. It is not given on any other of the 365 islands in that Bay. It uses the one that has on it 44.51N. That is to say, it does not prefer to use the 44.4N that would have been of use with Hobson's Nose where the original story that inspired the OI one originated in 1830. What we have is a travelling story that may be using its position. 44.51N is an invitation to involve the constellation Cygnus and the Northern Cross in the way it was done much earlier in Italy. 44.4N would have been an invitation to use a Mercator map alignment from Giza through the Pillars of Hercules. That alignment belongs to another story which has ties to John Dee in England in the 1580. The geometry in that tone is upon a plane projection of the globe. Anyone with any degree of cleverness could have fished from a least those two factoids to craft their mystery suggestion.
Using a specified distance? Very interesting these points would align using 180 feet, 360 feet, 720 feet etc., at 360 degrees and only using the most important angles of geometry (30, 45, 60 & 90)? I'm not very good at math or geometry, but they say math is a little more concrete than history. Anyone know what King Henry I shoe size was?
It could lend credence to why Morris would align the lots on oak island to a 30 degree plane. Was it the best way to divide the island or was it the best way to maintain the integrity of the cross? Did Morris know of the supposed treasure? Many of the lots occupied on the island are in significant locations and seem to have owners with a more interesting history? This area has been well known to many explorations prior to any survey for some reason.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom