More "What is it"

missoiula4me

Full Member
Aug 4, 2012
109
47
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Is it a hair clip? What is causing the bluish residue

This casing is a REM-UMC
25-35.

In same area found case with REM-UMC
300 SAV

I grew up around firearms never saw a 25-35. And a 300 SAV IS A LARGE CASE. THIS ONE ISN'T
 

Attachments

  • image-2467431196.jpg
    image-2467431196.jpg
    24.1 KB · Views: 97
  • image-863672220.jpg
    image-863672220.jpg
    22 KB · Views: 105
  • image-476466527.jpg
    image-476466527.jpg
    30 KB · Views: 95
  • image-225939954.jpg
    image-225939954.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 90
  • image-2654371162.jpg
    image-2654371162.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 96
  • image-2824612577.jpg
    image-2824612577.jpg
    64.2 KB · Views: 96
Modern shotgun shell. Other pic is what you want to find out About. What kind of metal was your detector giving you. Silver? Gold?
 

Upvote 0
Untitled Document

Love finding old brass. I found some 38-55wra brass the other day and had the same thoughts:dontknow: been shooting forever and never heard of such a thing. Makes it fun, soon any brass will be a thing of the past :BangHead:
 

Upvote 0
It's a rifle cartridge. The picture is misleading. I didn't give a size reference.
 

Upvote 0
Some info on the cartridge

Untitled Document











The .25-35 Remington Revisited
by George Hoyem
25-35rem.gif
The March 2000 Collector page illustrates an odd rimless cartridge headstamped U.M.C. 25-35 REM that Rick Montgomery lent us for this study. It is shown between the .25 Remington auto-loading cartridge and the .25-35 Winchester. The U.M.C. cartridge is obviously a factory load but the shoulder is farther down the case than on the .25-35 Winchester and the neck is longer. It is of the same tapered construction as the Winchester case, with a much smaller case capacity than the .25 Remington auto-loader. Since then three of our arms/ammunition historians have studied this problem-Roy Marcot, Lou Behling and Howard Hoovestol. We summarize their findings.

John Browning's autoloading rifle was introduced by Remington in late 1906. The 1908 catalogue first announced it as the "Autoloading Rifle," but this was later changed to Model 8. It further states: "Note - Rifles adapted for the 25/35 Rem, central fire and rimless, will be announced as soon as ready." The 1909 Remington lists the following calibers for this rifle-"....35 caliber Remington Autoloading central fire rimless, smokeless powder cartridge...; also the following cartridges: .25 Rem., 30/30 Rem., and .32 Rem., all central fire and rimless, smokeless powder."

The 1908 catalogue carries the only reference to a ".25-35 REM." The cartridge we are concerned about was made by Union Metallic Cartridge Company. Remington-UMC did not come into being until 1911. From all of this it is apparent that U.M.C, experimented with a rimless .25 caliber case for Remington no doubt as early as 1906. They may have trimmed the rim off a .25-35 Winchester case and cut an extraction groove. They also altered the
shape of the case body. The first attempts were rejected. Perhaps Remington was dissatisfied with the cartridge's performance; perhaps there were feeding problems. Whatever, the case was redesigned to give it greater powder capacity, sharper shoulder, shorter neck as we know the .25 Remington cartridge today. The experimentals were no doubt scrapped. But why did U.M.C. go to the trouble of headstamping the first cartridge? We can only surmise that the project was well along before Remington decided to reject the first design. Lou tells the story of a boy who accompanied his father on a tour of an ammunition plant, and the tour guide reached into a big barrel full of rejected cartridge cases, and handed the boy one. This was the only specimen of this case that survived, and made that boy a cartridge collector. U.M.C. and Remington scrapped the rejected cartridges but at least one found its way out of the U.M.C. plant-the one that Rick shared with us.

A problem remains. Since there is at least one headstamped .25-35 REM cartridge, are there very early Remington Autoloading rifles chambered for it? Probably not. If any were so chambered, they could have been reamed out to accept the final cartridge design. This is theory. If you have an old .25 caliber Remington Autoloader that won't chamber the .25 Remington cartridge, we have a new problem. Meanwhile, all cartridge collectors please check your cabinets for .25-35 REM cartridges headstamped U.M.C. There may he more than one out there. If you see holes in this analysis, let's hear from you. George Hoyem
25mix.gif
Left: .25 Remington Center: .25-35 Remington Experimental
Right: .25-35 Winchester


Our thanks to Rick Montgomery for sharing this rare and unusual specimen with us.
.25-35 Remington Dimensions
(from specimen)
Inchesmm
Bullet Diameter0.2506.3
Rim Diameter0.42010.7
Base Diameter0.41510.5
Neck Diameter0.2857.2
Case Length2.02051.3
OAL2.52064.0
.25 Remington Dimensions
Inchesmm
Bullet Diameter0.2596.3
Rim Diameter0.42210.7
Base Diameter0.42210.7
Neck Diameter0.2877.3
Case Length2.05052.1
OAL2.53068.9

At least one marked example of a Remington Model 8 in .25-35 Remington exists!
4-01.h1.jpg


Remington Model 8
4-01.h6.gif
Remington Model 8 pictures courtesy of Paul Pelfrey, Thanks Paul!!

The following images are courtesy of Roy Marcot. They show the continued developmental process of .25 caliber cartridges after the U.M.C. and Remington merger in 1911. Only the first drawing has the new "The Remington Arms Union Metallic Cartridge Company" letterhead. The others have the older "Union Metallic Cartridge Co." letterhead.
This first drawing of the .25 Remington is dated 1-14-1920
4-01.h2.gif

The second drawing of the .25 Remington is dated 6-2-1913
4-01.h3.gif

The third drawing of the .25 Remington is dated 5-23-1913.
4-01.h4.gif

The fourth drawing of the set is of a .25 Remington, High Power dated 6-12-1913.
4-01.h5.gif
.25 Remington, High Power Dimensions
(from drawing 4)
Inchesmm
Bullet Diameter0.2586.3
Rim Diameter0.46011.7
Base Diameter0.47512.1
Neck Diameter0.3629.2
Case Length2.19055.6
OAL2.62566.7

| Home | Patents |Current | Catalogs | Books Published |Collectors' | Order | Links | Publication Service |

You can order using See our Ordering page for details.
Orders can be placed by contacting Armory Publications by email, phone, or regular mail.
Armory Publications can be reached at (406) 549-7670, email at [email protected] or at Armory Publications, 2120 S. Reserve St., PMB 253, Missoula, MT 59801These pages and images are the property of Armory Publications, please contact them for use.
To Order or for Questions and Comments, please send e-mail to
[email protected]
These pages were prepared for Armory Publications by Brian Clark
Website maintained by Hoyem Publications
 

Upvote 0
the decorative item appears to be a victorian hair barrett.my best guess.blueish residue can happen when silver is in contact with highly acidic soil conditions such as pine needles.Try 18k acid test solution on sterling and you will see virtually same color.just happens more slowly in the wild....barrett 1.jpgbarrett 2.jpgbarrett 3.jpg
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
The first image has my hometown on it (Missoula, Mt). Strange coincidence.
 

Upvote 0
Could post a clear, close-up photo of the back of what appears to be a hair barrette? :) Breezie
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top