Mistake in gun bill could defeat the effort

A little history on Patrick Henry .... I assume you agree with this quote of his also ....

Henry supported the Federalist policies of Washington and Adams. He denounced the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, which called for the rights of a state to nullify a federal law it considered unconstitutional. Henry warned that civil war was threatened because Virginia,

"had quit the sphere in which she had been placed by the Constitution, and, in daring to pronounce upon the validity of federal laws, had gone out of her jurisdiction in a manner not warranted by any authority, and in the highest degree alarming to every considerate man; that such opposition, on the part of Virginia, to the acts of the general government, must beget their enforcement by military power; that this would probably produce civil war, civil war foreign alliances, and that foreign alliances must necessarily end in subjugation to the powers called in."


"We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." --Samuel Adams
 

Treasure_Hunter said:
"We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." --Samuel Adams

So does that mean that Patrick Henry is on the out with you.
 

"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence ... From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that is good" (George Washington)
 

So does that mean that Patrick Henry is on the out with you.

"We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." --Samuel Adams
 

Anything a little more recent than a couple hundred years ago??
 

Anything a little more recent than a couple hundred years ago??
Stock , I find little that you post worthy of a response so I don't . I am curious , however about your vast military and combat experience that makes you a pontiff ................. Oh, the hell with it ! I don't give a crap . Continue to post your drivel and I will go back to not responding .
>If you feel that is a personal attack and wish to complain ; go ahead .
>DILLIGAS !
 

What i think you were trying to say Truckin' is that you lack the capabilty to understand and comprehend Stock's rational,factual,truthful and logical "middle of the road" stance,posts and arguments? Therefor, you choose not to comment for fear of being ridiculed and looking unknowledgable! **

And what does Stock's military experience have to do with anything? How much military experience does a new president have when suddenly being elevated to commander in chief of the most powerful military the world has ever known?

** - This is no more of a "personal attack" than Truckin's attack on Jerseyben, just for daring to ask "what is wolfpack?"! (not a word said then.)
 

Here is the icon for the English right to defend.....
Man_Down_on_Knees_Praying_and_Pleading_For_Forgiveness_Royalty_Free_Clipart_Picture_110707-145613-032012.jpg
 

Well done TH!!!LOL!!:laughing7:
 

Here is the icon for the English right to defend.....
Man_Down_on_Knees_Praying_and_Pleading_For_Forgiveness_Royalty_Free_Clipart_Picture_110707-145613-032012.jpg

Hilarious. Very insulting,pure "nation bashing" and had i posted a similar US icon i'd be banned for life! Hypocritical really, but yeah, hilarious!
 

No more so than your signature.....After all English citizens do not have the right to carry arms to defend their selves...

o8lu.jpg
 

Personally I think it would be best if we were all able to discuss issues like adults and not have to resort to personal references which of course have nothing to do with any discussion at hand. It's a very juvenile thing to do and it would be great if the moderators could encourage folks to stop the practice.
 

Personally I think it would be best if we were all able to discuss issues like adults and not have to resort to personal references which of course have nothing to do with any discussion at hand. It's a very juvenile thing to do and it would be great if the moderators could encourage folks to stop the practice.

My signature is NOT an attack! True it can be used as a tongue in cheek "swipe" at the gun crowd, but it's purpose to ME is that it defines my views and beliefs on owning guns. Yeah yeah, i'm not an American blah blah blah etc, but it makes no difference. I believe EVERYONE should be entitled to defend and protect themselves and theirs....within reason!
1 shotgun - for home defence.
Max of 3 handguns for home defence/concealed carry.....with permits.
Hunting rifles to be allowed in rural areas and as required by legitimate hunters.

This is my belief, whether it be the US, Britain, Sweden or Guatamala. I DON'T agree with stockpiling guns and ammo because "well, you never know do you?"!!
So..my signature states my stance - I'm all for the first (with additions,restrictions) and not for the 2nd (no pun intended). If this upsets people then so be it!
 

My signature is NOT an attack! True it can be used as a tongue in cheek "swipe" at the gun crowd, but it's purpose to ME is that it defines my views and beliefs on owning guns. Yeah yeah, i'm not an American blah blah blah etc, but it makes no difference. I believe EVERYONE should be entitled to defend and protect themselves and theirs....within reason!
1 shotgun - for home defence.
Max of 3 handguns for home defence/concealed carry.....with permits.
Hunting rifles to be allowed in rural areas and as required by legitimate hunters.

This is my belief, whether it be the US, Britain, Sweden or Guatamala. I DON'T agree with stockpiling guns and ammo because "well, you never know do you?"!!
So..my signature states my stance - I'm all for the first (with additions,restrictions) and not for the 2nd (no pun intended). If this upsets people then so be it!

AGREE!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom