- Thread starter
- #21
Hi, Bill, Lamar and Ki
Bill, thanks for throwing in! So the obvious question is, if you are sure casting wasn't used at any point in the process (more to say about this in a minute), then what technique do you think was employed to make these coins?
If the coins were not poured, a die had to be made. Can you propose some way to make a die without casting? What is this process? I would like to hear more.
Ki, what are the references to the sledge you described? Can you cite your sources?
Lamar, may I ask your opinion? Does the Mullins family mention of a hinged "type" for making the coins preclude the striking method? I don't know how a coin could be "struck" from a hinged type without damaging the hinges, but maybe I lack in imagination or experience with coin striking.
We might also need to keep in mind the interest of the parties involved in keeping their techniques close to their chests. These were individuals, after all, who preferred to produce counterfeit rather than disclose the source of their silver. There might be a bit of self-protective disinformation in some of these accounts. I would tend to trust the descriptions of the most disinterested parties, in the absence of examining the actual coins.
Anyone else care to chime in?
Best,
Pam
Bill, thanks for throwing in! So the obvious question is, if you are sure casting wasn't used at any point in the process (more to say about this in a minute), then what technique do you think was employed to make these coins?
If the coins were not poured, a die had to be made. Can you propose some way to make a die without casting? What is this process? I would like to hear more.
Ki, what are the references to the sledge you described? Can you cite your sources?
Lamar, may I ask your opinion? Does the Mullins family mention of a hinged "type" for making the coins preclude the striking method? I don't know how a coin could be "struck" from a hinged type without damaging the hinges, but maybe I lack in imagination or experience with coin striking.
We might also need to keep in mind the interest of the parties involved in keeping their techniques close to their chests. These were individuals, after all, who preferred to produce counterfeit rather than disclose the source of their silver. There might be a bit of self-protective disinformation in some of these accounts. I would tend to trust the descriptions of the most disinterested parties, in the absence of examining the actual coins.
Anyone else care to chime in?
Best,
Pam