eddiecurrent
Full Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 133
- 57
- Detector(s) used
- Fisher 1236-x2, fisher cz3d and cz 20, tesoro golden sabre II
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
I read a lot of MD reviews, from different, wide-ranging sites. I always see this weird pattern...you read reviews that are glowing, wonderful, giddy....then you see a few...say 6 out 20, that totally trash the model. It goes from "best machine you can buy-a real winner- head of my stable-my go to machine - superb build quality" to "what a piece of garbage!- can't detect a quarter at 6 inches- flimsy piece of junk-can't figure out how to use this ridiculously complicated, poorly designed albatross".
Mind you, the trashers will always say "Don't tell me I don't know how to use it, I've been detecting for 30 yrs and have owned dozens of detectors"...if they don't like a Fisher or Teknetics for example, they'll often dismissively call it a "bounty hunter toy".
Thing is, I'VE been detecting for 30 yrs and have owned some of the detectors they're trashing...and they're really off base for the ones I'm familiar with. The negative comments are unwarranted imo.
So I wonder...why do they do it? What's the motivation? Why do they take the time out of their day to exaggerate or fabricate negative reviews? It undermines the whole process. It serves no positive purpose that I can see. It just seems to be a form of juvenile vandalism.
Any theories?
Mind you, the trashers will always say "Don't tell me I don't know how to use it, I've been detecting for 30 yrs and have owned dozens of detectors"...if they don't like a Fisher or Teknetics for example, they'll often dismissively call it a "bounty hunter toy".
Thing is, I'VE been detecting for 30 yrs and have owned some of the detectors they're trashing...and they're really off base for the ones I'm familiar with. The negative comments are unwarranted imo.
So I wonder...why do they do it? What's the motivation? Why do they take the time out of their day to exaggerate or fabricate negative reviews? It undermines the whole process. It serves no positive purpose that I can see. It just seems to be a form of juvenile vandalism.
Any theories?