Maybe We Can Agree?

[EE THr]

I predict that the answers from the LRLers will be either nonsensical gibberish, outright insults, or off-topic diversions.

Yawn

You continue to prove my prediction to be correct, con-artie.

How many times to you have to admit it to the World, before you will admit it to yourself?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Cry Of The Eagle: History And Legends Of The Cherokee Indians And Their Buried Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

How many times to you have to admit it to the World, before you will admit it to yourself?

May be if the question could be understood you may get an answer..Art

 

[fenixdigger]

Add 1 cup of transference and 1 tsp denial, mix well, sprinkle with insults and post, over and over and over. That's how they do it.

Simple recipe, same bad taste. We like to call it THE RANDI BROWNIE It's sticky and chock full of nuts.

A lot better than "Hey little girls, I've got candy"


SHO-NUFF

 

[EE THr]

Add 1 cup of transference and 1 tsp denial, mix well, sprinkle with insults and post, over and over and over. That's how they do it.

Simple recipe, same bad taste. We like to call it THE RANDI BROWNIE It's sticky and chock full of nuts.

A lot better than "Hey little girls, I've got candy"


SHO-NUFF

Rather than any logical defense of your fantasy claims, you can only promote your favorite non-science, which is the eugenics program. Have you snuffed any babies today?



P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Maybe We Can Agree

Sorry..You can copy and paste all you want but it wil not change the answer..We do not agree with you..End of story..Art

 

[aarthrj3811]

Thank you, con-artie. That's exactly what I have been saying all along. That you don't want to name a test protocol that you think is fair, because if you did, then you would have to take your own test.

It is not the my job as you need the test.

And you know that you can't withstand any test of proof, because you are a fraud.

How can I be a fraud?

But, in doing so, you have agreed with me! Oops!

This is weird science

You are so predictable!

According to your Personal Insult list

The secret is, that because I know you are a fake, I then know exactly what you will do.

What am I faking?

 

[EE THr]

Maybe We Can Agree

Sorry..You can copy and paste all you want but it wil not change the answer..We do not agree with you..End of story..Art

Thank you, con-artie. That's exactly what I have been saying all along. That you don't want to name a test protocol that you think is fair, because if you did, then you would have to take your own test.

And you know that you can't withstand any test of proof, because you are a fraud.

But, in doing so, you have agreed with me! Oops!

You are so predictable!

The secret is, that because I know you are a fake, I then know exactly what you will do. (Duh!)

Of course you won't describe your version of a fair test, because you would automatically be agreeing to take that test!



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

It is not the my job as you need the test.

Answer. Thank you, con-artie. That's exactly what I have been saying all along. That you don't want to name a test protocol that you think is fair, because if you did, then you would have to take your own test.

How can I be a fraud?

Answer.. And you know that you can't withstand any test of proof, because you are a fraud.

This is weird science

Answer.. But, in doing so, you have agreed with me! Oops!

According to your Personal Insult list

Answer.. You are so predictable!

What am I faking?

Answer.. The secret is, that because I know you are a fake, I then know exactly what you will do.
Of course you won't describe your version of a fair test, because you would automatically be agreeing to take that test!
Great answers

 

[EE THr]

It's simple, folks.

Are LRLs supposed to be---
1. Dowsers?
2. Dowsing enhancers?
3. All-electronic Locaters?
4. Something else? And if so, what are they supposed to be then?
5. Or just fake devices, to cheat people out of money?

They've got to be one of the above.

So which one are they supposed to be?

This is not a trick question.

There is an answer.

What is it?









Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Hate to give you the bad news..You will never be the king of twist and spin on T-Net..We have had people like “old Sam” , “J’Black” and may others that were much better ..Ted has lost a few steps but he still is better than you..Please note that all but Ted are way got from this site…Art

 

[aarthrj3811]

Actually....LRL's are fraudulent instruments used to defraud and scam the electronically challenged out of their hard earned cash. They were never made to "actually work"....simply a tool for the conman to screw the unsuspecting

That would be a number 5...all day long

I think it would be like a #2

 

[EE THr]

Hate to give you the bad news..You will never be the king of twist and spin on T-Net..We have had people like “old Sam” , “J’Black” and may others that were much better ..Ted has lost a few steps but he still is better than you..Please note that all but Ted are way got from this site…Art

What a perfect #19!

To try and avoid answering the question!

Thanks, con-artie, you are so helpful.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Actually....LRL's are fraudulent instruments used to defraud and scam the electronically challenged out of their hard earned cash. They were never made to "actually work"....simply a tool for the conman to screw the unsuspecting

That would be a number 5...all day long

I think it would be like a #2

That's one of your typical #22's.


Why don't you simply give an answer to the question?

What are they?









Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

Actually....LRL's are fraudulent instruments used to defraud and scam the electronically challenged out of their hard earned cash. They were never made to "actually work"....simply a tool for the conman to screw the unsuspecting
That would be a number 5...all day long

~EE~

What a perfect #19!
To try and avoid answering the question!
Thanks, con-artie, you are so helpful.

~EE~

That's one of your typical #22's.
Why don't you simply give an answer to the question?
What are they?

~SWR~

Well lookie there EE....right on cue! A conman trying to screw the unsuspecting!

The last question
~EE~
What is it?

 

[EE THr]

~SWR~

Actually....LRL's are fraudulent instruments used to defraud and scam the electronically challenged out of their hard earned cash. They were never made to "actually work"....simply a tool for the conman to screw the unsuspecting
That would be a number 5...all day long

~EE~

What a perfect #19!
To try and avoid answering the question!
Thanks, con-artie, you are so helpful.

~EE~

That's one of your typical #22's.
Why don't you simply give an answer to the question?
What are they?

~SWR~

Well lookie there EE....right on cue! A conman trying to screw the unsuspecting!

The last question
~EE~
What is it?

Again you pretend that you don't know, faker.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Again you pretend that you don't know, faker.

It would be nice if you could tell me what I don’t know..Art

 

[EE THr]

Again you pretend that you don't know, faker.

It would be nice if you could tell me what I don’t know..Art

It's simple.

Are LRLs supposed to be---
1. Dowsers?
2. Dowsing enhancers?
3. All-electronic Locaters?
4. Something else? And if so, what are they supposed to be then?
5. Or just fake devices, to cheat people out of money?

They've got to be one of the above.

So which one are they supposed to be?

This is not a trick question.

There is an answer.

What is it?









Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Another list…I now know that this thread has reached it end…Art

 

[aarthrj3811]

Now he spins and twists his own post..Art

 

[EE THr]

Now he spins and twists his own post..Art

You posted no data to support your statement. This is merely a personal insult.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?