- #1
Thread Owner
Is there a significant difference between the manticore and 900 as far as performance?
Thanks Joe
Thanks Joe
...difference between the manticore and 900 as far as performance...
Thanks for your help answered was well appreciatedI think the difference comes down to, do you want the machine to try and give you some sort of graphic display of what it is detecting?.... If that is important then the Manticore is for you, at a price.. I am an Equinox user, not a fan boy,, absolutely hated it for the first year or so,, but stuck with it and have had some good results.. I know someone who has a manticore and we have searched together,, he wasn't finding anything that i couldn't find, but could get an abstract image of the target, which he swiftly learned to ignore. I used his machine for a limited time, liked the build and easy enough for a Nox user to adapt to the machine,, but really couldn't see the advantage provided by the machine.. Saying that, i don't see the improvement with the new series of Equinox either, i like the gadgets added, vibration, shafts etc... but in reality it doesn't do anything extraordinary compared to the previous versions..
So.... My answer to your question would be , not much difference between the two, nor in fact between those two and the older generations of the Equinox.
AD
I heard, haven't used my Manticore yet, ground unfortunately is frozen solid here,, that it falses on iron, what I don't know yet is, does it detect a washer as a non-ferrous target and shows it up as a circle on the baseline? If it does, it is just an expensive detector that really has little advantage over a Legend say or even an Ace 300 (I had one, it detected circular objects and called them coins, but usually came up as bottle caps and washers). I do understand and agree to the above, to ignore the visuals on the Manticore because gold can be missed that way.I think the difference comes down to, do you want the machine to try and give you some sort of graphic display of what it is detecting?.... If that is important then the Manticore is for you, at a price.. I am an Equinox user, not a fan boy,, absolutely hated it for the first year or so,, but stuck with it and have had some good results.. I know someone who has a manticore and we have searched together,, he wasn't finding anything that i couldn't find, but could get an abstract image of the target, which he swiftly learned to ignore. I used his machine for a limited time, liked the build and easy enough for a Nox user to adapt to the machine,, but really couldn't see the advantage provided by the machine.. Saying that, i don't see the improvement with the new series of Equinox either, i like the gadgets added, vibration, shafts etc... but in reality it doesn't do anything extraordinary compared to the previous versions..
So.... My answer to your question would be , not much difference between the two, nor in fact between those two and the older generations of the Equinox.
AD
What the heck are you doing with 3 similar detectors? Gotta have the latest or do you do testing/reviews?I have owned and put quite a few hours on both. I believe the Manticore is better at noise reduction. You can put more power to the coil with the Manticore, and I do running my sens 28 - 30. With the Nox 800 and 900 I mostly hunted by tone. I like the Manticore visuals. No way I would go back from it. The 900 was a big step up from the 800 tho.
I started metal detecting around five years ago. First bought the White's Spectra V3i. I liked the machine and found many nice objects with it. But my gripe was the lack of weatherproofing. I go out in the rain and snow and around wetlands where I could drop and fry it. Plus, it was kind of clunky and didn't break down nicely into my field pack. The electronics carried the White's legacy but in an outdated chassis.What the heck are you doing with 3 similar detectors? Gotta have the latest or do you do testing/reviews?
Since I will use a detectors for many hours before moving on or up, I feel that metal detecting is a cost effective hobby. You make the initial investment and you are ready to go. The only consumable item is the 9 volt battery for my pin pointer.I do also dig big iron and find it interesting, but I’m also searching for a 8 grain nugget.
You sound like your a metal detecting manufacturers dream customer, or a dream buddy for someone that needs a cheap literally brand new detector and company.
No insult intended.
I’ve got well 43 years experience if you count the summer weekends spent helping grandpa carefully dig modern coins from schools and campgrounds. I’ve gotten a bit more selective in where I search now.
I wouldn't know myself because I don't have an Equinox 900 to compare with my ManticoreIs there a significant difference between the manticore and 900 as far as performance?
Thanks Joe
All my detectors pay for themselves 0ver and over with gold nuggets. Even my first Tesoro. I just ordered detector number 10. Paid for with gold nugget money. I don’t still have all of them. But I do still have my nox 900. It works great for tiny bedrock gold. Gold Kruzer is my favorite nugget only vlf. Smokes the rest when it comes to reliability and ground handling capabilities. No bump sensitivity at all and super hot on tiny gold. Half the price too. My gpx 4500 is great but it’s heavy and is only going to wear a big coil and be a specialized targeted deep big gold machine now. Just ordered an Axiom. Hopefully the Axiom will be my main nugget hunting machine nowI was merely commenting on the fact that it appears that you have bought a detector nearly every year since you have been detecting. That was the basis of my comment of being a dream customer.
Nothing wrong with that. I’m jealous.
My grandfather bought two detectors that I know of over his numerous decades of swinging. My dad a half dozen. Most recently in the last 16 years I’ve bought 2 detectors. Before that one was passed down to me.
I drool over some of them, but always talk myself down.
I have no doubt that you can “pay” for a detector. I’ve done it with relics once then again with gold.