Lets try and avoid the lock?

[Owassokie]

This thread has played out a hundred times on here. It's always the same thing. People with experience conclude item is natural. New guy "doesn't know for sure" but wants to "learn" and believes experienced rock hounds are just close minded.

The fact is your piece doesn't appear to be worked according to some very knowledgeable people. "Perfectly tapered" holes can happen naturally. If we can't conclude that it's been worked then we can't conclude it's a tool. Now, you can think it's a tool. You can conclude on your own it's a tool. You can have lots of discussions and come up with new theories. You can lash it it a handle. You can research it every direction. But until you prove it's been worked, most people will conclude it is natural.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[Doubter in MD]

Education aside , what practical method of hafting such a potential head exits?
Go ahead and experiment. Learning by testing hypothesis or theory beats speculation any day.

Using cordage through the holes (and lets ignore the holes not reamed smooth or consistently to reduce fraying cordage or creating slop from irregular diameters) how will cordage be used to secure a handle?

We are now faced with a conclusion , the holes don't suit the designed task. Nor does the "groove".

The lithic material is next.
I'm guessing without better testing....But it looks like sedimentary material ,or clay. That ups the odds of the holes being related to decayed sticks or crustations,ect. leaving the holes. Or just inclusions outside of the majority of the original material.

Mostly though , and again I'm not able to deduce the quality from pictures in this instance , if suspicion of it being a mild sedimentary material are accurate , a single whack with a harder stone would break the "axe head".

Would some one work a mild stone in such a manner as prescribed (the drilling in particular) into an axe?

Knowledge in the past was not only hands on ,but likely shared.
The rule of "a cutting tool must be harder than the material being cut" holds as ever true.

If we hafted your piece and whacked a mastodon bone to extract the marrow ,how successful would we be after repeated attempts?
If we wanted a small axe to bonk heads with , would your piece suffice?No it wouldn't due to ergonomics of leverage and flex with the extended "blade".
Tools for such are a short study when you/we wield them and use them.

Yes labor was available when success allowed the leisure of craftsmanship.
But how many axe making hours are expected?
How many holes need to be drilled in ancient manners to realize drilling holes that are not needed sucks?

Then beyond ergonomic balance , is the balance of art meets craftsmanship.
Material choice is included in that.
Basic rude tools of short use function exist , no doubt. Yet the labor spent on them can be deemed conservative. Obvious by looking at examples.
Time spent drilling multiple holes could be spent folding a split over a lithic piece and wrapping below. Multiple times.
Or put in a split limb still growing if time is not a concern.
With less blisters and carpal tunnel....

Or cutting a piece and trimming a branch to create a L shape and lashing to it.
Or , seating a lithics end in a root knot. Ect,Ect...

Feel free to haft your piece and test it. It would add much to it's potential function and qualities.
I can see it not being practical as an axe. Even if only decorative. And it certainly is ungainly in it's means/proportion. (No offense to crude tools.)

Perhaps they used this...



It's obviously prehistoric.


Just going for a little levity but I really did like this post. Very informative. Very sensible. Kudos.

 

[Indiana_acklac]

It's obvious that you don't really want input from the forum unless they agree with you.

View attachment 1808308

Not quite.

 

[Indiana_acklac]

Education aside , what practical method of hafting such a potential head exits?
Go ahead and experiment. Learning by testing hypothesis or theory beats speculation any day.

Using cordage through the holes (and lets ignore the holes not reamed smooth or consistently to reduce fraying cordage or creating slop from irregular diameters) how will cordage be used to secure a handle?

We are now faced with a conclusion , the holes don't suit the designed task. Nor does the "groove".

The lithic material is next.
I'm guessing without better testing....But it looks like sedimentary material ,or clay. That ups the odds of the holes being related to decayed sticks or crustations,ect. leaving the holes. Or just inclusions outside of the majority of the original material.

Mostly though , and again I'm not able to deduce the quality from pictures in this instance , if suspicion of it being a mild sedimentary material are accurate , a single whack with a harder stone would break the "axe head".

Would some one work a mild stone in such a manner as prescribed (the drilling in particular) into an axe?

Knowledge in the past was not only hands on ,but likely shared.
The rule of "a cutting tool must be harder than the material being cut" holds as ever true.

If we hafted your piece and whacked a mastodon bone to extract the marrow ,how successful would we be after repeated attempts?
If we wanted a small axe to bonk heads with , would your piece suffice?No it wouldn't due to ergonomics of leverage and flex with the extended "blade".
Tools for such are a short study when you/we wield them and use them.

Yes labor was available when success allowed the leisure of craftsmanship.
But how many axe making hours are expected?
How many holes need to be drilled in ancient manners to realize drilling holes that are not needed sucks?

Then beyond ergonomic balance , is the balance of art meets craftsmanship.
Material choice is included in that.
Basic rude tools of short use function exist , no doubt. Yet the labor spent on them can be deemed conservative. Obvious by looking at examples.
Time spent drilling multiple holes could be spent folding a split over a lithic piece and wrapping below. Multiple times.
Or put in a split limb still growing if time is not a concern.
With less blisters and carpal tunnel....

Or cutting a piece and trimming a branch to create a L shape and lashing to it.
Or , seating a lithics end in a root knot. Ect,Ect...

Feel free to haft your piece and test it. It would add much to it's potential function and qualities.
I can see it not being practical as an axe. Even if only decorative. And it certainly is ungainly in it's means/proportion. (No offense to crude tools.)

Thank you.

 

[Owassokie]

And before everyone gets all pissy and accuses me of being a troll: What if I actually found something?

If you did find something...you'll never know. Most will conclude it was naturally formed, which means the majority of people will not believe this was a tool. Therefore, unless you have a time machine, you won't be able to conclusively determine you found something. YOU may conclude it. You may find someone else who comes to that conclusion. But it won't widely be accepted.