Knights Templar Cache of Biblical Artifacts Concealed by Stone Cipher

[Treasure_Hunter]

My job is deciphering. If you wish to speak to that the cipher proves itself in independent verification, redundancy and clarity of message. I did my job exceptionally well and chose to share it with you. Your comments are vague and uninspired. The amount of proof is in the cipher. Enjoy your pudding.

Just like proof of dragons are real is because the fairy tales said so.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[Limitool]

SIZZLER ADLER: "My job was to translate the cipher. What the world does with it is none of my business. As it is none of my business to satisfy your random objections. It is what it is and if you get you get it. Not my problem either way."

Again who gave you this "job"...? If you've told "50,000 people" and you don't care what the world does with it then what is your goal? If you don't care after telling 50,000 people what's all the defense about? It will just remain theory and speculation.

 

[coast40]

You make many assumption of facts not evident. I am not the issue nor are your sensibilities and limitations.

"You make many assumption(s) of facts not evident" to me... What are you looking for here?

 

[SIZZLE ADLER]

"You make many assumption(s) of facts not evident" to me... What are you looking for here?

I am looking to share something that reveals where the most sought after artifact in history is and how to get it. I question your agenda. This cipher explains what happened the the collected artifacts of the Crusades. This cipher unmasks Masonry, The Ark, Many items of biblical origin. These are interesting topics. You are rightfully apathetic as so many have failed. However that does not excuse your decision to criticize without first attempting to understand the gravity of the subject, If you have a doubt please do not express the doubt. Simply ask a question of what is written. Such as, where did the data come from that produced 147/33? Why are these applied to the compass or horizon? These questions are things that I know about and can address. Someones prejudice and apathy is not of interest. Nor are their inextricable concepts having nothing to do with the post.

 

[SSR]

"You make many assumption(s) of facts not evident" to me... What are you looking for here?

Here are some more facts:

Nolan's cross fits in a plane that is tiled with a parallelogram (80,100,100,80). All the points on it are given by intersection of lines through vertices. The shape fits in a 5x8 rectangle. Everything is regular, so the assumption must be that it was surveyed to be like like that on its stem (the boulders on the am ends are fixed). The added rub is that the angle between this "cross" and the road through the island is also a regular number. The tilt of this shape is 30NE and it is an additional 20 degrees from the road heading. If that does not prove that this cannot predate the surveying of 1762 I do not know what can. You have two choices. It was done originally by Morris, or it was added later by someone who knew the road heading. That could be anyone between Morris in 1762 and Nolan in the 1980s. The fact we have another structure given to us from ca 1897 with the triangle pointer hints that a--they might have been done at the same time; b--that Nolan could have based a surveying of his own to make it be sympathetic to the pointer in the fact that a line is cut approximately (40%-60%) as the base of it. That might tell us that the STP' s base was potentially 0.39-0.61 instead of 0.4-0.6. In either case it is approximating 1/Phi. As I've mentioned before, the fact the Cross' heading is roughly on the great circle to Jerusalem is just about a dead give away that this is post 1750 because the place was simply not charted before that by anyone who had longitude data that would be sufficiently precise to make that happen symbolically. It immediately tells us we are dealing with the age in which there were navigational atlases produced. It simply cannot be ancient, and there is no reason why one should believe that. This obsession with geometry attached to a Biblical pit/vault legend screams out Freemasonic influence.

 

[Limitool]

I am looking to share something that reveals where the most sought after artifact in history is and how to get it. I question your agenda. This cipher explains what happened the the collected artifacts of the Crusades. This cipher unmasks Masonry, The Ark, Many items of biblical origin. These are interesting topics. You are rightfully apathetic as so many have failed. However that does not excuse your decision to criticize without first attempting to understand the gravity of the subject, If you have a doubt please do not express the doubt. Simply ask a question of what is written. Such as, where did the data come from that produced 147/33? Why are these applied to the compass or horizon? These questions are things that I know about and can address. Someones prejudice and apathy is not of interest. Nor are their inextricable concepts having nothing to do with the post.

If you know how to get it then share with someone who believes you that can actually take your theory and retrieve / prove it. A lot of us question your agenda by you defending your theory the way you do. If you've shared with 50,000 folks thus far and not a sole is advancing it then what is your agenda or goal...? Not one person here is interested in proving you wrong (as you requested) anymore than you can prove your right. So your on a merry-go-round with your theory and it remains pure speculation at best.

 

[TruthbeTold]

I am looking to share something that reveals where the most sought after artifact in history is and how to get it. I question your agenda. This cipher explains what happened the the collected artifacts of the Crusades. This cipher unmasks Masonry, The Ark, Many items of biblical origin. These are interesting topics. You are rightfully apathetic as so many have failed. However that does not excuse your decision to criticize without first attempting to understand the gravity of the subject, If you have a doubt please do not express the doubt. Simply ask a question of what is written. Such as, where did the data come from that produced 147/33? Why are these applied to the compass or horizon? These questions are things that I know about and can address. Someones prejudice and apathy is not of interest. Nor are their inextricable concepts having nothing to do with the post.

So many others who have posted here were also going to share the location of the greatest find in archeological history.

We are all still waiting…

 

[Limitool]

So many others who have posted here were also going to share the location of the greatest find in archeological history.

We are all still waiting…

You are so right. But it almost always seems the one who knows these locations are always so defensive and take offense when questioned or doubted. It seems like they want credit for something that is never proven. So it just stays in the theory / speculation mode. This latest guy requested us to prove him wrong... But he can't prove he's right... go figure..!

 

[DizzyDigger]

What I find most interesting is, if true, someone had to think up the idea, design and engineer this entire project, to that exact location, BEFORE the first shovel full of dirt was moved.

They had to come up with the idea, pick out which stars they wanted to use, then do all the math relating to angles and stuff. Then, they gathered all the needed materials and put them on a ship, and sailed to the exact spot ("X"). Have to wonder how long it took to dig/build the chamber so it would exactly reproduce the designs somebody came up with while standing on another part of the globe.

Sorry, not buying it. Nope, nope, nope, nope....

 

[DizzyDigger]

Sizzle...not buying it, but still intrigued by your cipher. Need to do a bit of research, but may have some fair questions for you about how the calculations were done.

 

[DizzyDigger]

Sizzle, was there a specific date and time associated with the measurements involving Aldebaran and the Pleiades?

There are several months of the year when Aldebaran is not even visible from Oak Island, as it's on the other side of the planet.