King Arthur in ANNWN (Other World)

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is a common practice of these purveyors of fabricated pseudo history to fit material totally unrelated to their "facts" as proof of their "research".
In the below link, an article presented as "FACT" of King Arthur being killed by Delaware Indians, has several photos of a cave were he was buried and an British church wall paint showing his death by 20 Indian arrows as evidence proving that Arthur and 70,000 Welsh in the United States in 674 AD.
The painting on the wall of St Andrews Church in Stokes Dry, Rutland , England does NOT depict Arthurs death by Native American Indians as claimed by these authors.
It depicts the death of King Edmund (St Edmund) of East Anglia in 869AD by Vikings Ivar the Boneless and his brother Ubba, similar to the martyr death of St Sebastian.
All this brings into question, if that wall painting is falsely used as proof of Arthur in America, then those cave photos are considered fruit from the poisoned tree and are equally false.
The question that remains is why go to such deceptive means attempting to prove a fabricated fake history to others?

Referenced from Blog Article "King Arthur vs Delaware Indians" by Noeller & Atwell

(deleted for rule violation)
 

Last edited:
If you buy my book, I will throw in a bridge. :laughing7:
 

Last edited:
The usual silence when pressed for factual evidence....
 

In the Blog Article "King Arthur's Final Location" by Americans Noeller & Atwell, while acknowledging Alan Wilson & Baram Blackett (pen name of Andrew Terry) as the prime source of their information, they go off on a massive miasma melange of misinformation mixing characters and people from various time to fabricate evidence in a sordid ruse attempt prove the claim of King Arthur in America and being killed by Native Americans in Jackson county, Kentucky.
As with the English church wall painting of St Edmund, which there are several in British churches, they mislabel as showing this alleged murder, they misidentify Norse Rune stones as that fake Coelbren alphabet detailing Arthur and Welsh in America.
The legend of Prince Madoc's 12th century discovery of America that was promoted during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I as an attempt to claim all of North America for England is combined with the King Arthur legend, with Madoc becoming Arthur's brother, and Morgan La Fey, Arthur's half sister and mother of Mordred, are merged to become Arthur's nephew, son of Madoc.
For good measure, Taliesin, a 6th century itinerate poet/bard, author of the "Book Of Taliesin" becomes Merlin the Druid wizard and mentor to Arthur.
With all this mixing of misinformation and mislabeled pictures and photos the question that needs to be addressed:
To what purpose does promoting this obvious travesty of pseudo history of King Arthur in America serve?
 

To rephrase the question:
Why write Blog Articles and make posts claiming this fictional alternative fake history as fact?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top