BillA
Bronze Member
Thanks Jeff for a great series of clippings; what each describes is interesting - and together they are a horror.
as we are all setback observers, our 20/20 hindsight lets us dissect and ascribe the errors
most amazing to me is that the courts repeatedly found for the finders, still hard to believe
that the physical payout was delayed again and again, normal
the boys were initially induced to be "honest", the first sucker play
- and guess what? the boys learned, and the second was kept quiet -> does this act then make the boys "dishonest"?
(I could go on but "honesty"is a philosophical quagmire.)
good posts Jeff
as we are all setback observers, our 20/20 hindsight lets us dissect and ascribe the errors
most amazing to me is that the courts repeatedly found for the finders, still hard to believe
that the physical payout was delayed again and again, normal
the boys were initially induced to be "honest", the first sucker play
- and guess what? the boys learned, and the second was kept quiet -> does this act then make the boys "dishonest"?
(I could go on but "honesty"is a philosophical quagmire.)
good posts Jeff