July 4, 1782 Birth Token on 1820s-30s Peruvian 2 Reale

dwayne sueno

Bronze Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
1,103
Reaction score
17
Golden Thread
0
Location
upstate ny
Detector(s) used
se pro
Primary Interest:
Other
I'm visiting a friend in Rhode Island, and found this birth token not very deep in his back yard.
The reverse is smooth, with "John Thompso(n?) Born July 4 1782" inscribed on the back.

The obverse looks to be a "large standing maiden" type design made from 1828 through the 1830s in Peru. The coin is 1" in diameter (that's about 2 reale dimensions, perhaps?), and concave/convex, the obverse being the convex side. Pretty sure it is a counterfeit, based on the look of the metal and the weight of the piece in my hand. I didn't perform the drop test for sound, heh heh.

Obviously there is a chronological aberration occurring here, and I'd be curious to hear any ideas about it. Perhaps the token was presented to John on his 50th birthday? An interesting conversation piece, for sure...

Thanks for looking, and HH, dwayne

UPDATE:

perhaps these pics are a little better...

i've taken the counterfeit off the title of this one in deference to iron patch.
the peruvian 2 reale that is host to the birth token looked too porous and felt too light to be silver, but iron patch pointed out that it held up to the elements better than a counterfeit probably would have. the lightness could perhaps be explained by the smoothing of the reverse field to serve as a flat base for the inscription, and if there were milled edges, they were shaved off.

further detecting in my friend's yard did not produce anything comparably old, but did yield a few items that could be traced to the late 1800s/early 1900s, including a clay marble (not pictured) and this Providence Police button, manufactured by the American Button Co., active from 1901-1920.

Wasn't able to find a link between a John Thompson and my friend's house, and combined with the general date of the other finds, it is my supposition that the birth token was lost much later than the 1820s-1830s when the coin was minted, probably around the turn of the 20th century.

Obviously I'm guessing alot on this post without much fact to back me up, but i'm working with some pretty thin leads. Still, i'm pleased as punch to have rescued such a neat artifact of colonial life from the wilds of the urban Rhode Island landscape. HH, dwayne
 

Attachments

  • img029.webp
    img029.webp
    39.4 KB · Views: 315
  • img030.webp
    img030.webp
    40.6 KB · Views: 312
  • P1010009_1.webp
    P1010009_1.webp
    38.6 KB · Views: 310
Upvote 0
Hogge- thanks. congrats on recent research revelations!

Don- thanks for those excerpts. very informative. i had no idea that some of the smaller silver denominations were being debased. that would explain a lot!
yes, John Thompson is a very, very common name. I couldn't find anything tying the house to him, and suspect that the coin was (your death token theory would back this up) lost by a relative or someone else, and that the location of the drop may have nothing to do with John Thompson. i've hit several yards in the past where i could tell that some early 20th century kids had gotten into their parents' collection of coins from "the old country", and lost some of it playing with it in the yard. perhaps something similar happened here.

Danglangley- thanks for the translation. i think you're right. i was kinda hoping that it meant, "the onions are firm and fruity." just kidding.

thanks all and HH, dwayne
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom