Is Kyle Kennedy and SFRX in a Conspiricy with the State of Florida ?

[Salvor6]

Thanks for the correction.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[seekerGH]

GME can't file an admiralty claim. It is in state waters and the Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987 gave ownership of all shipwrecks in state waters to the state.

That is not correct. The ASA gives title to abandoned shipwrecks. One has to file an Admiralty Arrest to get a determination that the wreck has been abandoned. Shipwrecks are not considered abandoned by default.

[h=3]§2101. Findings[/h]The Congress finds that—
(a) States have the responsibility for management of a broad range of living and nonliving resources in State waters and submerged lands; and
(b) included in the range of resources are certain abandoned shipwrecks, which have been deserted and to which the owner has relinquished ownership rights with no retention.

(
Pub. L. 100–298, §2, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 432.)

[h=3]§2102. Definitions[/h]For purposes of this chapter—
(a) the term "embedded" means firmly affixed in the submerged lands or in coralline formations such that the use of tools of excavation is required in order to move the bottom sediments to gain access to the shipwreck, its cargo, and any part thereof;

 

[Black Duck]

That is not correct. The ASA gives title to abandoned shipwrecks. One has to file an Admiralty Arrest to get a determination that the wreck has been abandoned. Shipwrecks are not considered abandoned by default.

§2101. Findings

The Congress finds that–
(a) States have the responsibility for management of a broad range of living and nonliving resources in State waters and submerged lands; and
(b) included in the range of resources are certain abandoned shipwrecks, which have been deserted and to which the owner has relinquished ownership rights with no retention.

(
Pub. L. 100—298, §2, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 432.)

§2102. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter–
(a) the term "embedded" means firmly affixed in the submerged lands or in coralline formations such that the use of tools of excavation is required in order to move the bottom sediments to gain access to the shipwreck, its cargo, and any part thereof;

Seeker what is not correct, can you clairify

For embedded if you do not need tools of excavation then it is not embedded, even if you choose to use, your are not required to use

 

[buccaneer1961]

out of curiosidy,who are the witnesses for the other side?

 

[seekerGH]

This is not correct....

It is in state waters and the Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987 gave ownership of all shipwrecks in state waters to the state.

out of curiosidy,who are the witnesses for the other side?

Easier to refer to the thread on this, so far, these have been filed. http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/s...t-removed-spanish-lost-sea-9.html#post5562027

 

[Tom_Restorer]

Aquanut,

here are some examples from the antiquitie business:

ADA About the Antiques Dealers' Association

IADAA International Association of Dealers in Ancient Art

may a good source to look at their ethic rules and other infos etc.

 

[Black Duck]

Did kyle pay the way for John De-bry to go to France for Florida to meet with France behind GME's back without consulting with GME ?

Was Tim Parsons part of this plan ?

Did the secretary of State sanction this conspiracy ?

Was Chuck Meade involved ?

Lets look at just some of the docs on this

Did SFRX get a recovery permit in Lou of a settlement with the State of Florida ?

Just saying, these people are getting funding from our tax dollars

 

[Salvor6]

If those wrecks are so important to Florida's history why doesn't Chuck get them himself? Instead they let the artifacts sit on the bottom slowly rotting away until they will eventually disappear. Doesn't make sense.

 

[signumops]

If those wrecks are so important to Florida's history why doesn't Chuck get them himself? Instead they let the artifacts sit on the bottom slowly rotting away until they will eventually disappear. Doesn't make sense.

Because they claim that using a blaster is destructive and they can't spend enough time on this particular site using an airlift to do the job. They've boxed themselves in by bad-mouthing the necessary method vs. their preferred method, mostly because they insist on creating the illusion that our methods must be bad, and therefore, can not be used, according to their philosophy... which really has nothing to do with scientific method at all. Here's a comparative 5 minute excavation, blaster vs. 10 inch airlift.