Jim in Idaho
Silver Member
- Jul 21, 2012
- 3,349
- 4,750
- Detector(s) used
- White's GM2, GM3, DFX, Coinmaster, TDI-SL, GM24K, Falcon MD20, old Garrett Masterhunter BFO
'Way Too Cool' dual 18 Watt UV light
- Primary Interest:
- Prospecting
Yes...but that is a relatively recent new rule. If you go back 10 years, or maybe even less, it was common practice that sellers would leave negative feedback as punishment for the buyer who left negative feedback, even if the buyer paid promptly, and got screwed by the seller. So, the result was all sellers got treated pretty well....buyer were afraid to leave the TRUE feedback the bad sellers really deserved.ebay doesn't allow sellers to leave negative feedback for a buyer. That being said, I agree with your basic point that ebay needs to police their business and takes steps to minimize the number of irresponsible (or worse, dishonest) sellers and buyers. If this is actually happening, I'm all for it also.
The way EBay should have been setup was first of all...no returns on purchases. Second, if the buyer paid promptly, they got positive feedback. Then the bad sellers would get the feedback they deserved, and in the case where buyers left bad feedback for sellers that didn't deserve it, all sellers would eventually get some negatives, but it would all balance out, and buyers would see, and discount, a certain amount of negatives on sellers. Then Ebay should have rooted-out the sellers that were consistently causing problems. They also should have rooted-out buyers who didn't pay. With everything being done by credit card, or PayPal, there's no excuse for not paying....NONE. But EBay wanted all the sellers they could get...because that's who generates the revenue to Ebay. It was short-term thinking, and it's proving a pain-in-the-butt to correct.
Jim