Help ID Revolutionary War Button

squarenuts711

Newbie
Mar 16, 2012
1
0
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • button 3 017a.jpg
    button 3 017a.jpg
    118.4 KB · Views: 1,002
  • button 3 021a.jpg
    button 3 021a.jpg
    106.2 KB · Views: 495
  • button 3 016a.jpg
    button 3 016a.jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 502
  • button 3 007a.jpg
    button 3 007a.jpg
    101.7 KB · Views: 656
Your button is classified in the Albert button-book as a "Loyalists Corps" button. Loyalists were British colonists in America who remained loyal to the British Government during the American Revolution.

Your button's front is shown as button LC-1 in the Albert button book, which contains additional info about the Loyalists Corps and your button.

We need to see a photo of your button's back, because the LC-1 button has been reproduced in the modern era. The Albert book lists the Repro as button LC-1R snd says it is a "Recasting in pewter from an Original button." The figure 7 is impressed on the button's back, wedge shank, drilled hole.
 

Upvote 0
TheCannonballGuy said:
Your button is classified in the Albert button-book as a "Loyalists Corps" button. Loyalists were British colonists in America who remained loyal to the British Government during the American Revolution.

Your button's front is shown as button LC-1 in the Albert button book, which contains additional info about the Loyalists Corps and your button.

We need to see a photo of your button's back, because the LC-1 button has been reproduced in the modern era. The Albert book lists the Repro as button LC-1R snd says it is a "Recasting in pewter from an Original button." The figure 7 is impressed on the button's back, wedge shank, drilled hole.

to me this screams repro
 

Upvote 0
Most assuredly a modern reproduction of a British Rev War button! :-\

The original military pewter buttons of the era had either iron loop shanks, or cast pewter loop shanks. Never seen a drilled shank on any Colonial pewter buttons, military or civilian. The casting quality is really poor as well, with flow seam flaws on the face. We rarely if ever see these types of flaws in original period buttons.

CC Hunter
 

Upvote 0
Yep, too bad. I have dug at least 40 legit ones, all with iron loop shanks. (should say had iron loop shanks as they are rare to be intact here when dug from a farm field)
 

Upvote 0
Even though Squarenuts711's repro button doesn't have the impressed number 7 in its back, described on the Bicentennial reproductions in the Albert button-book, it does have a drilled hole for sewing onto the clothing. None of the Original ones had a drilled hole.

Squarenuts711, just in case you don't already know, these reproduction Loyalist Corps buttons are manufactured for use by Rev War battle re-enactors. It's simpler and cheaper for manufacturers to make a solid-cast copy of an Original button and drill a hole in the cast shank, than to also have to make a large quantity of wire loops and individially solder the loop onto each button's back.
 

Upvote 0
Here are two examples of the correct shanks on original Revolutionary War pewter buttons.

First is the style most commonly seen with Rev War British and Loyalist buttons, featuring a steel wire (rusty iron) shank that is integrally cast into the button. This particular example is on a 3rd Foot Guards button.

Second is the style usually seen with most Continental American as well as civilian pewter buttons of the period, featuring a rounded wire-shaped loop, cast as one piece pewter along with the body of the button. This particular example is a USA entwined Continental button.

CC Hunter
 

Attachments

  • 3FGback0.jpg
    3FGback0.jpg
    71.2 KB · Views: 778
  • RevWar4.jpg
    RevWar4.jpg
    68.3 KB · Views: 796
Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top