Help ID Buckle-Double Headed Eagle?

[Trooper733]

I am moving this over from another thread to where it belongs if you've seen it before. I found this buckle near the site of a WWII POW camp here in Oklahoma. There are no identifying marks of any kind on it. It is composed of a soft, non-magnetic alloy and has some kind of silver plating on it. It is similar in size to the brass military web belt buckles or boy scout/cub scout web belt buckles. It was suggested in the previous thread it may have a Masonic origin. One friend suggested Prussian origin because of the design...I have been unable to find any reference. Anyone have confirmation on this or another ID and possible age?
Thanks in advance.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

DR.ÖTEK Metal Detector, Waterproof Gold Detector, Pinpoint & Terrain Modes, Professional Metal Detector - Grab it through Amazon!

[fyrffytr1]

Possibly Russian?

 

[2screwed]

The double headed eagle is the symbol of the Masons Scottish Rite and it does look like that. It usually has a number on it's chest but not always. With the light glaring on it's chest in the photo I can't see anything there but that would be my guess.
Here are some images of Scottish Rite double headed eagle:

https://www.google.com/search?q=scottish+rite+buckle&client=firefox-a&hs=6PG&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&channel=fflb&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=cy97Uf_PNpCyigL41IBY&ved=0CF8QsAQ&biw=1333&bih=908

 

[Trooper733]

Thanks. Sorry about the pic quality, my good 35mm SLR is on the fritz due to battery. I had to use a point and shoot camera and lack of flash control drove me nuts.

 

[Trooper733]

Also, it doesn't have the 32nd or 33rd degree emblem in the center, but it sure does resemble the Masonic Eagle. I am a Mason and it didn't even cross my mind that's what it might be.

 

[2screwed]

Your welcome. The pics good just has a glare in a bad spot. I'm no expert on the Masons but I just finished researching a misidentified Masonic Knights Templar piece so I recognize the eagle. On the other hand I could be totally wrong. Wouldn't be the first time.