bigscoop
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 13,541
- Reaction score
- 9,078
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Wherever there be treasure!
- Detector(s) used
- Older blue Excal with full mods, Equinox 800.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
"The pattern he (Petter Amundsen) found is a square-and-compass celestial pattern that MIMICS some aspects as those of the Masons..."
AuthorStory: Petter Amundsen and the Oak Island Treasure Revealed in Hidden Codes in Shakespeare
*NOTICE the wordsrobably", "theorizes", "Most Likely" used in that article.
Most likely what Amundsen theorizes probably mimics various alleged aspects of "secret societies" without the benefit of actual hard fact or evidence.
Exactly! The only time "is" is used in regards to the actual alleged facts is usually in the form of a question, all else being "could be" or "possibly" or "maybe" etc., etc. We see this same thing on shows like Oak Island, Hitler Hunters, etc., play out time and time again, the objective to try to convince the audience that actual facts and clues are being discovered without ever actually directly calling them confirmed facts because they don't really have any actual confirmed facts. It's building drama and a continuing story line from complete unknowns. In recent years there have been a number of shows that have followed this same obvious scheme, pretty much the same exact theme and process that has generated so many sensationalized legends and conspiracy theories over the years. It worked back in the day and it still works today, keeps fooling the masses into believing in things that just don't exist, or can't actually be established to have ever existed. "Complete unknowns can be made into whatever someone desires them to be."

Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited: