Tom_in_CA
Gold Member
- Mar 23, 2007
- 13,804
- 10,336
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 2
- Detector(s) used
- Explorer II, Compass 77b, Tesoro shadow X2
little bill, you say:
"There is a very good article about this in the Western&Eastern Treasures magazine. "
What month and year edition was this in? Got a link to the article?
And to expand on your reminder to "check local and state laws", I would add that this does not necessarily mean to ask "can I?" (as some people have interpretted that to mean). In other words, if someone "checks state and local laws", and sees no prohibitions on metal detecting, then that would be enough, right? They would no more need permission then, to metal detect, than they would to fly a frisbee. Because if it's not prohibited, then so be it The reason I say this, is there has been many instances of persons who feel they need permission (despite there being no prohibitions), and even gone to the extent of pushing permission letters under bureaucrats to sign, and ... instead ...... end up with a "no", where there was never any problem before. Ie.: the old "no one cares till you ask" psychology. Thus if someone searches the rules (usually available on-line) and sees no prohibitions at their local parks, then that would be sufficient, right?
"There is a very good article about this in the Western&Eastern Treasures magazine. "
What month and year edition was this in? Got a link to the article?
And to expand on your reminder to "check local and state laws", I would add that this does not necessarily mean to ask "can I?" (as some people have interpretted that to mean). In other words, if someone "checks state and local laws", and sees no prohibitions on metal detecting, then that would be enough, right? They would no more need permission then, to metal detect, than they would to fly a frisbee. Because if it's not prohibited, then so be it The reason I say this, is there has been many instances of persons who feel they need permission (despite there being no prohibitions), and even gone to the extent of pushing permission letters under bureaucrats to sign, and ... instead ...... end up with a "no", where there was never any problem before. Ie.: the old "no one cares till you ask" psychology. Thus if someone searches the rules (usually available on-line) and sees no prohibitions at their local parks, then that would be sufficient, right?