civil_war22
Relic Recovery Specialist
- Dec 5, 2008
- 3,215
- 2,813
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 1
- 🏆 Honorable Mentions:
- 1
- Detector(s) used
- Fisher F75 SE/LTD2, minelab Etrac, whites classic id, spectrum xlt, fisher f7, fisher 1266, king of all Tesoro Cibola, Tesoro Vaquero, Fisher 1280-X, minelab equinox, Fisher F75+ Garrett AT MAX
- Primary Interest:
- Relic Hunting
I’ve had the worst luck lately with finding owners of land I’ve been wanting to detect. I usually use a site called actdatascout.com, but they don’t give you the persons phone number, and sometimes the homeowners physical address is just a PO Box. Is it just me or does anyone else ever feel tempted in sending someone a letter? I know going, and asking for permission in person is more personal, but sometimes there is just no other way. I’ve been a law enforcement officer before, and can tell you that it only takes one idiot to ruin it for everyone, even public parks, but also in the same instance if someone has passed away, and the house goes back to the city for them to tear down, without permission I still feel bad for going, and detecting it eventhough there may be a 1860’s home on it. I know it’s tempting, but so is strippers to some men. In one hand I can see where if it belongs to the city and is just going to be a vacant lot then I can see that being public property, but in the other hand there are towns who make up “ ordinances “ to keep folks like us from doing it. My brother, and I went to a location the other day, in the same way I was talking, a 1860’s home that had gone to the city, it was a prominent attorney back then home, and now the city was going to demo it. We asked the neighbor if he knew who owned it, and he said the city, and said I don’t see a problem with y’all doing it, but then on the other side of the road a crackhead who lived over there said someone had been ran off last week by the police for tearing the yard up metal detecting. Really chaps my hide, how some can ruin it for others.