Sorry just get tired of person talking with no proof. I'm sure everyone else on the net feels the same....
Not necessarily !
But here are some of my concerns, that none of you want to touch with a 10 foot pole. I posted them on so e other forum, but nobody wants to consider it.
To most here:
I wish you would stop putting him on a pedestal, and start hearing what Fenn is actually saying. It is really interesting how selectively you guys choose what statement from him you want to accept and which you simply dismiss because it does not fit your theories.
For example : he clearly said that if he were to live his life over, he would do everything different, yet most of you here think that he is some kind of a model for perfect lifestyle and put on a pedestal to worship. Take that lesson from him, and choose not to grab every banana, as many are lemons, as he said. He certainly seems to wish that he has lived his life differently
Regarding the finding of the treasure he states, that it is not a giveaway or a lottery, and nobody will just stumble over it. He said that he wants
someone worthy to find it - i am just parafrasing here. Remember, in a lottery anyone can be a winner, all they need is some silly luck. That does not seem to be the case here, and I think that option should be on the table. After all, 500 years from now nobody would know about any clues or poem anyway, ( so non would be special or worthy ) so why totaly eliminate that scenario. So is it only for a select few, maybe even a select one = someone specific, someone worthy, that this chase was intended for? And all of the other seekers are just millers, keeping time and things moving along, and spending their money unnecessarily - well supporting local economies, never really having a chance? Which begs another question: is the treasure in its hiding spot at all times or only at a select " special " time. Now those are the questions you should be asking and have a right to have answered! I was lucky to catch it at a special time, when it was visible. But it would seem that that might not be the case for most of the time.
He also mentions something that he hopes that the hunt goes as intended - that also speaks of preconceived end, perhaps designed by an architect? See the movie 9th gate = 9 gates= 9 clues to eternal life . I do not wish to promote that movie, but for the reference, look for an architect in it = I believe that is the same architect that designed this chase. Fenn does not make any claim that he is the architect he mentioned, people simply assumed that.
Btw - remember his stamens that the poem wrote itself, the letters just appeared on the screen? ! = that is a very important stament, yet none of you seem to be taking it into consideration. He also said that the poem was designed by an architect and that it took 15 years to write it, and made many changes to it. Does not that seem like conflicting statements?
And yes it is very similar with a TT by Stadther - same type statements.
So before you waste your money on a fruitless effort, consider those things. He said he has thought of everything, and that it is not a giveaway.
I would like to hear your opinions and comments on those issues.
