Evidence of Giants roaming the earth

[BuckleBoy]

It is clearly a conspiracy by the scientists to cover up the discovery of Giants.


Scientists did find a new species of human ancestor this year, but it is a bit smaller than you might have hoped:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska - Grab it through Amazon!

[Kentucky Kache]

It is clearly a conspiracy by the scientists to cover up the discovery of Giants.


Scientists did find a new species of human ancestor this year, but it is a bit smaller than you might have hoped:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html

Smaller than who hoped? I'm not hoping for it, I've already seen it.
It's the height of stupidity to say you believe in the history that bones teach, and then turn around and deny it.

 

[BuckleBoy]

It is clearly a conspiracy by the scientists to cover up the discovery of Giants.


Scientists did find a new species of human ancestor this year, but it is a bit smaller than you might have hoped:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html

Smaller than who hoped? I'm not hoping for it, I've already seen it.
It's the height of stupidity to say you believe in the history that bones teach, and then turn around and deny it.

You saw what? A Copy of a supposed archaeological find at the Bible Museum in Texas?

 

[Kentucky Kache]

It is clearly a conspiracy by the scientists to cover up the discovery of Giants.


Scientists did find a new species of human ancestor this year, but it is a bit smaller than you might have hoped:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html

Smaller than who hoped? I'm not hoping for it, I've already seen it.
It's the height of stupidity to say you believe in the history that bones teach, and then turn around and deny it.

You saw what? A Copy of a supposed archaeological find at the Bible Museum in Texas?

You amuse yourself, don't you.
You do know what we're talking about, right? Try and keep up.

 

[Shortstack]

Kentucky Kache:

Thanks for posting all that info. I saved it for reference and further exploration. You do know why some folks make fun of the Creation Evidence Museum in Texas don't you? It's because they cannot refute the information gathered there and so they feel the need to mock the place because they're afraid of what it means.

Take a look at the scientific papers posted to the site, among other things such as the physical exhibits. The website is www.creationevidence.org

As far as that "Hobbit Human" thing found a few months ago; well, I don't trust those findings. I keep remembering the out and out fraud committed by the people who "found" Nebraska Man, the Peking Man, and other such world shaking scientific discoveries. Nebraska Man was built around a single molar tooth; until a couple of years later when the rest of the skeleton was recovered........the PIG's skeleton. The Peking Man's skull was broken apart by the archaeologist and reconstructed. The skull was actually an ape's skull that was rebuilt using a human jawbone and other pieces. That little fraud was exposed years ago, but the skull is still referred to in college textbooks as if it is authentic.

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Yeah, they have to come up with something. And one deception is as good as another, whether it makes sense or not.

 

[thrillathahunt]

It has always been a mystery to me why the book of Enoch is non-canonical. According to Gen. 5:18-24, Enoch was the great grandfather of Noah, the "seventh son" from Adam. The book of Enoch has even been quoted by the canonical books of Jude and Hebrews, and was considered "holy" scripture by early Christians and Church leaders.

Why were the writings of Enoch descredited at the Counsil of Laodecia in 336AD? Even going so far as banning the book and punishing those who read it?

And....why, according to the book of Hebrews was Enoch "taken" without having died

 

[Shortstack]

It has always been a mystery to me why the book of Enoch is non-canonical. According to Gen. 5:18-24, Enoch was the great grandfather of Noah, the "seventh son" from Adam. The book of Enoch has even been quoted by the canonical books of Jude and Hebrews, and was considered "holy" scripture by early Christians and Church leaders.

Why were the writings of Enoch descredited at the Counsil of Laodecia in 336AD? Even going so far as banning the book and punishing those who read it?

And....why, according to the book of Hebrews was Enoch "taken" without having died

I believe Enoch's writings were banned because he reported seeing and experiencing things that were far outside the "norm" at that time. The church leaders professed their beliefs, but didn't really want solid proof. It was (and still is) easy to look on the historical info as something far away in reality. Sort of like fairy tales. After all, the church leaders professed to believe in Angels; just not any that would come down and give someone a "ride". In a way, Enoch was looked on by his peers just as abductees are looked at today. Kinda like a nut; or in Enoch's case, a possible hieratic. The Book of Enoch was originally left out of the Bible by those 100 theologians because they were trying to second-guess King James and didn't want to p--- him off.