Evidence of Giants roaming the earth

texan connection

Silver Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
4,562
Reaction score
79
Golden Thread
0
Location
Texas
Detector(s) used
Minlabe SE, ace 250, fisher 1280x
I also belive inthe Bible as 100% but I look at this from a Archlogical view point. Not as evidence of my belief to convince folks(If it does Thats good) but to open the mind to its possibilities. The videos are a long documentary and explore many possibilities.

The Human Fossile have actually been discovered and confirm Giants exisitence as old as the dinasoures
 

I enjoyed the 4 giants at Mt. Rushmore.
This is clear evidence that giants did walk the earth.
 

Attachments

  • A man among Giants.webp
    A man among Giants.webp
    24.6 KB · Views: 2,668
Read, The Book of Enoch.
 

The behemoth described in Job, sounds exactly like a Brontosaurus. No elephant had a tale "like a cedar". The shape of a cedar is large at the base and tapering to a point at the tips. Elephants don't graze "like an ox", they grab grasses and other greenery with their trunks and stuff it into their mouths. Dragons were not crocs either. Scientists have discovered dinosaur skulls with large unexplained chambers inside of them. Some of these scientists believe it's quite possible these dyno's had the ability to blow chemical fire from their nostrils or mouths---similar to Bombardier Beetles. The Bombardier Beetle can spray a chemical fire from their butt ends that is hotter than boiling water. The heat is generated when the 2 chemicals are mixed AFTER being sprayed from their organs. One of those 2 chemicals acts as an oxidizer. Now, if a little beetle has that capability, then why not a much larger animal?
 

Thanks Texan been awhile since I saw that video. When they dug out Russell cave down the road they dug a 7 foot indian out of there. I sent the link to the artifact section. Peopling of the Americas seems to have been on the east coast by caucasians is the most beleived theory at the moment.
Thanks for the post !
TnMountains
 

texastee2007 said:
Shortstack said:
The behemoth described in Job, sounds exactly like a Brontosaurus. No elephant had a tale "like a cedar". The shape of a cedar is large at the base and tapering to a point at the tips. Elephants don't graze "like an ox", they grab grasses and other greenery with their trunks and stuff it into their mouths. Dragons were not crocs either. Scientists have discovered dinosaur skulls with large unexplained chambers inside of them. Some of these scientists believe it's quite possible these dyno's had the ability to blow chemical fire from their nostrils or mouths---similar to Bombardier Beetles. The Bombardier Beetle can spray a chemical fire from their butt ends that is hotter than boiling water. The heat is generated when the 2 chemicals are mixed AFTER being sprayed from their organs. One of those 2 chemicals acts as an oxidizer. Now, if a little beetle has that capability, then why not a much larger animal?

exactly right. I have seen with my own eyes...footsteps of humans...and a very large dinosaur print... Written in stone!!! the Bible is right once again.

Say, TT; were those footprints in the Puluxi River in Texas? Dr. Carl Baugh led the expedition that uncovered those prints. He said that, after making plaster casts of the one dinosaur print with the human print inside of it, they covered it back up with soil to help protect it from the elements. He has another one where the path of a human was crossed by a small dinosaur and a lizard's print smashed the mud in such a way that it pushed the human print out of shape at the side of the heel. That combination was actually cut out from the matrix and carried to the museum. He had a catscan done on it and the grain structure of the stone proved that the prints were made insitu when the stone was still mud; it was not carved by someone trying to fake it.

Dr. Baugh also has solid proof that it does not take millions of years for something to fossilize. He has a human foot that was fossilized in less than 57 years. How can he prove that? Well, when it was dug up in west Texas, it was encased in a cowboy boot that was manufactured in 1953. Dr. Baugh said that it appeared that someone took a long step out of an airplane without a parachute. (maybe a stoolie was tossed out of a drug plane ) You might ask, "how would he know THAT?" Well, a catscan showed the entire bone structure of the leg, from the knee down, was telescoped into the boot. That's proof of a looooooog fall before hitting the ground.
 

Shortstack said:
Dr. Baugh also has solid proof that it does not take millions of years for something to fossilize. He has a human foot that was fossilized in less than 57 years. How can he prove that? Well, when it was dug up in west Texas, it was encased in a cowboy boot that was manufactured in 1953. Dr. Baugh said that it appeared that someone took a long step out of an airplane without a parachute. (maybe a stoolie was tossed out of a drug plane ) You might ask, "how would he know THAT?" Well, a catscan showed the entire bone structure of the leg, from the knee down, was telescoped into the boot. That's proof of a looooooog fall before hitting the ground.
What has this got to do with how the foot was fossilized.
 

It has to do with.. Fossilization is No date setter, carved in stone so to speak. There are Human tools found that were incased in fossilized bone. Carbon dating is also very debatable.
 

TEXAN Connection said:
It has to do with.. Fossilization is No date setter, carved in stone so to speak. There are Human tools found that were incased in fossilized bone. Carbon dating is also very debatable.

Yeah, a piece of shell from a living oyster was tested and carbon dated to be about 1,500 years old.
The reading curve of carbon dating is good to only about 50,000 years ago. So those carbon dating results claiming to be older than that are just lies and labeled by people with agendas.
In addition, if you do not know the total amount of carbon 14 in the body or plant when they died, then there's no way you can figure the accurate age of the test subject because you have no starting point to begin figuring the half-life.

Speaking of "half-life"; if the earth is about 80,000,000 years old, why is there still natural uranium in existence? In that time, wouldn't all of it have already turned to lead?
 

I saved this PDF a while back, and this discussion brought it to memory again... so I found the link for it!
It just discusses the fact that petrification & mineralization process can occur at a much faster rate than scientists give credit for.

http://www.discoveryof.com/eZine/NewsArticles/_2007/_01/20070113-009.pdf

Shortstack said:
The behemoth described in Job, sounds exactly like a Brontosaurus. No elephant had a tale "like a cedar". The shape of a cedar is large at the base and tapering to a point at the tips. Elephants don't graze "like an ox", they grab grasses and other greenery with their trunks and stuff it into their mouths. Dragons were not crocs either. Scientists have discovered dinosaur skulls with large unexplained chambers inside of them. Some of these scientists believe it's quite possible these dyno's had the ability to blow chemical fire from their nostrils or mouths---similar to Bombardier Beetles. The Bombardier Beetle can spray a chemical fire from their butt ends that is hotter than boiling water. The heat is generated when the 2 chemicals are mixed AFTER being sprayed from their organs. One of those 2 chemicals acts as an oxidizer. Now, if a little beetle has that capability, then why not a much larger animal?

I do believe I agree with you SS, however... it does appear that the Behemoth and the Leviathan are two separate described animals. The Leviathan actually appears to be the same as the mythical (or were they?) dragons. Basically, a dinosaur that breathed fire. It's also noted that the Leviathan had scales. Glad you also pointed out the Bombardier Beetle, because I have found their characteristics very fascinating when it comes to this subject of animals breathing fire. However, it isn't a chemical "fire" that the beetle produces... but rather, a chemical "heat"

Bran <><
 

Just a note about the beetle; the mixing occurs within the beetle and at this
point the resulting pressure causes the spraying or ejection of the chemical.

This is the latest info. Earlier scientists had it wrong.
 

TEXAN Connection said:
It has to do with.. Fossilization is No date setter, carved in stone so to speak. There are Human tools found that were incased in fossilized bone. Carbon dating is also very debatable.

Yep. Dr. Baugh has a hammer head encased in stone and a small cast iron pitcher that was found encased in a large lump of coal that came from deep within a coal mine in the 1920s. That pitcher is accompanied by a signed, sworn statement made by 2 miners who actually broke open the coal and saw the pitcher fall out. Their job was to break down large pieces of coal into smaller ones to aid in processing. And talk about coincidents; the town close by that coal mine was, and still is, named Heavener, Oklahoma.

Hey, Bran, you certainly are right about the dragons. Those so called mythical stories from merry old England concerning firebreaathing dragons were based on TRUE happenings. When someone was hit by the chemical "breaths" of those animals, they didn't put too much emphasis on whether or not their burns were from chemicals or "fire" fire. Technically speaking all fires we use are actually "chemically" oriented. Wood does not burn......the fumes that are off-gased by the hot wood is what is actually burning. The same for gasoline. Liquid gas does not burn.....the gas fumes are burning.

Now, I'll wait for the naysayers to jump in on those statements. :laughing7:
 

Shortstack said:
Hey, Bran, you certainly are right about the dragons. Those so called mythical stories from merry old England concerning firebreaathing dragons were based on TRUE happenings. When someone was hit by the chemical "breaths" of those animals, they didn't put too much emphasis on whether or not their burns were from chemicals or "fire" fire. Technically speaking all fires we use are actually "chemically" oriented. Wood does not burn......the fumes that are off-gased by the hot wood is what is actually burning. The same for gasoline. Liquid gas does not burn.....the gas fumes are burning.

Now, I'll wait for the naysayers to jump in on those statements. :laughing7:

Shouldn't be any to jump in, seeing as how those are all valid statements. The idea of whether the dragons of lore breathed chemical fire, opposed to physical flames is definitely a presentable concept for which I think I can at least count as plausible, even though there are no ways to validate that... for now anyway.

Bran <><
 

Bran,

I watched a presentation by a PhD who specializes in paleontology as it applies to "mythical" animals and he is convinced that the story of Beowulf is a TRUE story. Not that Hollywood crap, but the Celtic story and he gave details of exactly HOW the hero could defeat the monster in his hand-to-hand fight.
 

One can find evidence to support just about anything these days.
 

Some of these dinosaurs, weighing from 80 to 100 tons, would eat between 2 and 4 tons of vegetation every day. From this digestion process , enough methane gas to fill
20 greyhound buses would be produced in continuous eruptions.
If an ignition source were available, the flames would be enormous and possibly explosive.
 

In the late 1950´s during road construction in Homs southeast Turkey, Many tombs of Giants were indeed unearthed. These tombs were 4 meters long, and when enterd in 2 cases the human thigh bones were measured to be 47.24 inches in length. They calculated that the person who owned this Femur probably stood at fourteen to sixteen feet tall. A cast of this bone is seen at the Creationist museum in Texas.

Flavius Josephus, the noted Jewish historian of the first century A.D., described the giants as having "bodies so large and countenances so entirely different from other men that they were surprising to the sight and terrible to the hearing." And he adds that in his day, the bones of the giants were still on display!



AUSTRALIAN GIANTS:

There was a race or group of people found in Australia called "meganthropus" by anthropologists. These people were of very large size--estimated between 7 to 12 feet tall, depending on what source you read. These people were found with mega tool artifacts, so their humanness is difficult to question. Four jaw fragments and thousands of teeth have been found in China of "gigantopithecus blacki"--named after the discover. Based on the size of the teeth and deep jaws, its size has been estimated at around 10 feet and as tall as 12 feet, 1200 pounds.


PROOF OF AUSTRALIAN GIANTS:

In old river gravels near Bathurst, NSW, huge stone artifacts -- clubs, ponders, adzes, chisels, knives and hand axes -- all of tremendous weight, lie scattered over a wide area. These weigh anything from 8, 10, 15, to 21 and 25 pounds, implements which only men of tremendous proportions could possibly have made and used. Estimates for the actual size of these men range from 10 to 12 feet tall and over, weighing from 500 to 600 lbs. A fossicker searching the Winburndale River north of Bathurst discovered a large quartzitised fossil human molar tooth, far too big for any normal modern man. A similar find was made near Dubbo, N.S.W.


Prospectors working in the Bathurst district in the 1930´s frequently reported coming across numerous large human footprints fossilized in shoals of red jasper.


Even more impressive were fossil deposits found by naturalist Rex Gilroy around Bathurst. He excavated from a depth of 6 feet (2 m) below the surface a fossil lower back molar tooth measuring 67 mm. in length by 50mm. x 42 mm. across the crown. If his measurements are correct, the owner would have been at least 25 ft. tall, weighing well over 1,000 lbs!


At Gympie, Queensland, a farmer, Keith Walker, was ploughing his field when he turned up the large fragment of the back portion of a jaw which still possessed the hollow for a missing lower back molar tooth. This is now in Rex GiIroy´s possession. The owner of the tooth would have stood at 10 feet tall.


In the Megalong Valley in the Blue Mountains NSW, a Mr P. Holman found in ironstone protruding from a creek bank the deeply impressed print of a large human-like foot. The print was that of the instep, with all 5 toes clearly shown. This footprint measures 7 inches across the toes. Had the footprint been complete it would have been at least 2 feet (60 cm in length, appropriate to a 12 foot human. However, the largest footprint found on the Blue Mountains must have belonged to a man 20 feet tall!


A set of 3 huge footprints was discovered near Mulgoa, south of Penrith, N.S.W. These prints, each measuring 2 ft long and 7 inches across the toes, are 6 ft. apart, indicating the stride of the 12 ft. giant who left them. These prints were preserved by volcanic lava and ash flows which "occurred millions of years" before man is supposed to have appeared on the Australian continent (if one is to believe the evolutionary theory): Noel Reeves found monstrous footprints near Kempsey, N.S.W. in sandstone beds on the Upper Macleay River. One print shows toe 4 inches (10cm) long and the total toe-span is 10 inches (25cm) - suggesting that the owner of the print may have been 17 feet tall.


It is certain the Aborigines were not the first to reach Australia. Anthropologists maintain mainland Aborigines are in fact quite recent arrivals that ate their predecessors who were akin to the New Guinea natives. Aborigine themselves admit in their ancient folklore that this land was inhabited by several groups of men, as well as giants, before they settled here.


MORE GIANT RECORDS:

In an old book entitled "History And Antiquities Of Allerdale," there is an account of a giant found in Cumberland, England, at an unknown date in the middle ages. Called "A True Report of Hugh Hodson, of Thorneway," it states: "The said giant was buried four yards deep in the ground, which is now a corn field. He was four yards and a half long, and was in complete armor; his sword and battle-axe lying by him....his teeth were six inches long, and two inches broad...." The bones of a twelve foot tall man were dug up in 1833 by a group of soldiers at Lompock Rancho, California. The skeleton was surrounded by giant weapons, and the skull featured a double row of teeth. Yet another giant was unearthed in 1891, when workmen in Crittenden, Arizona excavated a huge stone coffin that had evidently once held the body of a man 12 feet tall. A carving on the granite case indicated that he had six toes.


OTHER GIANT EVIDENCES:

In July, 1877, four prospectors were looking for gold and silver outcroppings in a desolate, hilly area near the head of Spring Valley, not far from Eureka, Nevada.

Scanning the rocks, one of the men spotted something peculiar projecting from a high ledge. Climbing up to get a better look, the prospector was surprised to find a human leg bone and knee cap sticking out of solid rock. He called to his companions, and together they dislodged the oddity with picks. Realizing they had a most unusual find, the men brought it into Eureka, where it was placed on display.

The stone in which the bones were embedded was a hard, dark red quartzite, and the bones themselves were almost black with carbonization - indicative of great age. When the surrounding stone was carefully chipped away, the specimen was found to be composed of a leg bone broken off four inches above the knee, the knee cap and joint, the lower leg bones, and the complete bones of the foot. Several medical doctors examined the remains, and were convinced that anatomically they had indeed once belonged to a human being, and a very modern-looking one.

But an intriguing aspect of the bones was their size: from knee to heel they measured 39 inches. Their owner in life had thus stood over 12 feet tall. Compounding the mystery further was the fact that the rock in which the bones were found was dated geologically to the era of the dinosaurs, the Jurassic - over 185 million years old. The local papers ran several stories on the marvelous find, and two museums sent investigators to see if any more of the skeleton could be located. Unfortunately, nothing else but the leg and foot existed in the rock." Strange Relics from the Depths of the Earth--Jochmans http://www.ior.com/~kjc/pages/strange.htm


EVEN MORE RECORDS OF GIANTS:

In 1833, soldiers digging at Lompock Rancho, California, discovered a male skeleton 12 feet tall. The skeleton was surrounded by caved shells, stone axes, other artifacts. The skeleton had double rows of upper and lower teeth. Unfortunately, this body was secretly buried because the local Indians became upset about the remains.


In 1932, Ellis Wright found human tracks in the gypsum rock at White Sands, New Mexico His discovery was later backed up by Fred Arthur, Supervisor of the Lincoln National Park and others who reported that each footprint was 22 inches long and from 8 to 10 inches wide. They were certain the prints were human in origin due to the outline of the perfect prints coupled with a readily apparent instep.


During World War II, author Ivan T. Sanderson tells of how his crew was bulldozing through sedimentary rock when it stumbled upon what appeared to be a graveyard. In it were crania that measured from 22 to 24 inches from base to crown nearly three times as large as an adult human skull. Had the creatures to whom these skulls belonged been properly proportioned, they undoubtedly would have been at least 12 feet tall or taller.



GIANT SKULLS FOUND:

Ivan T. Sanderson, a well-known zoologist and frequent guest on Johnny Carson´s TONIGHT SHOW in the 1960s (usually with an exotic animal with a pangolin or a lemur), once related a curious story about a letter he received regarding an engineer who was stationed on the Aleutian island of Shemya during World War II. While building an airstrip, his crew bulldozed a group of hills and discovered under several sedimentary layers what appeared to be human remains. The Alaskan mound was in fact a graveyard of gigantic human remains, consisting of crania and long leg bones. The crania measured from 22 to 24 inches from base to crown. Since an adult skull normally measures about eight inches from back to front, such a large crania would imply an immense size for a normally proportioned human. Furthermore, every skull was said to have been neatly trepanned (a process of cutting a hole in the upper portion of the skull).

In fact, the habit of flattening the skull of an infant and forcing it to grow in an elongated shape was a practice used by ancient Peruvians, the Mayas, and the Flathead Indians of Montana. Sanderson tried to gather further proof, eventually receiving a letter from another member of the unit who confirmed the report. The letters both indicated that the Smithsonian Institution had collected the remains, yet nothing else was heard. Sanderson seemed convinced that the Smithsonian Institution had received the bizarre relics, but wondered why they would not release the data. He asks, "...is it that these people cannot face rewriting all the textbooks?"


REVISED ARTICLES:

In Lampec-Rancho California, in 1833, soldiers discovered a skeleton 11´ 9" long which was covered with boulders with an unidentified writing. A similar writing was unearthed on the isle of Santa Maria off the cost of Los Angeles. In July of 1887 in Eureka Nevada, a human leg was found measuring 38.9 inches form the knee to the heel. The man was over 11 foot tall. In Crittenton Arizona in 1891 a sarcophagus was uncovered containing a human 3 meters high and had 12 toes. More recently skeletons ranging from 2.8 meters to 3.12 meters were found by soviets in the Caucasus Mountains. In China skeletons 10 feet tall have been found. In the Philippines a giant human skeleton was found at gargation, Measuring 17 feet long. In the Eagle three Cole mine at Bear Creek Montana in 1920 two human molars were found three times larger than normal. In Braton Tennessee human footprints were found in solid rock 33 inches log and one foot wide. These also have six toes each. Tools found in Morocco are so large their users must have been at least 12 foot tall. Other Giants found around the world are: the Java giant, the south China giant, and the South Africa giant. (See The Timeless Earth p. 26)

In 1833,soldiers digging a pit for a powder magazine at Lompock Rancho, California, hacked their way through a layer of cemented gravel and came up with the skeleton of a giant man about twelve feet tall. The skeleton was surrounded by carved shells, huge stone axes, and blocks of porphyry covered with unintelligible symbols. The giant was also noteworthy in still another respect: He had a double row of teeth, both upper and lower. When the natives began to attach some religious significance to the find, authorities ordered the skeleton and all the artifacts secretly reburied - and, of course, lost to the scientific study they deserved.

This particular giant, incidentally, bore marked similarity to another, that of a giant man with double rows of teeth whose skeletal remains were dug up on Santa Rosa Island, off the California coast. Subsequent research has shown that he, or his descendants, feasted on the small elephants which once lived on that island and which have vanished like the giants who ate them, countless ages ago.

Near Crittenden, Arizona, in 1891, workmen excavating for a commercial building came upon a huge stone sarcophagus eight feet below the surface. The contractor called in expert help, and the sarcophagus was opened to reveal a granite mummy case which had once held the body of a human being more than twelve feet tall -a human with six toes, according to the carving of the case. But the body had been buried so many thousands of years that it had long since turned to dust. Just another silent witness to the truth of Genesis, which tells us that there were giants in the earth in those days, the excavation of over a dozen skeletons 8 to 12 feet tall, around the world, shocked archeologists.

These skeletons were positively human. Some of these skeletal remains are on Maui in lava caves near Ulupalakua and Olowalu. An example of this is the "mysterious" disappearance of more than 50 perfectly kept gigantic antediluvian skeletons (between 10-14 feet tall) found in a cave in Arizona.

Earth Giants : over the years a number of gigantic human skeletons have been unearthed. The most distinctive of these were the remains of some American giants found in the 1880s at Tioga Point, near Sayre in Bradford County, Pennsylvania, as recounted by Robert Lyman in Forbidden Land. Some other examples include the following:

A decayed human skeleton claimed by eyewitnesses to measure around 3.28 metres (10 feet 9 inches tall), was unearthed by labourers while ploughing a vineyard in November 1856 in East Wheeling, now in West Virginia.

A human skeleton measuring 3.6 metres (12 foot) tall was unearthed at Lompock Rancho, California, in 1833 by soldiers digging in a pit for a powder magazine. The specimen had a double row of teeth and was surrounded by numerous stone axes, carved shells and porphyry blocks with abstruse symbols associated with it.


THE HUBBARD DISCOVERY:

In this magazine for September, 1923, we mentioned a reported discovery by Mr. Samuel Hubbard, of remains of giants in the Grand Canyon of Arizona. Owing to press unreliability, we did not notice this to a great extent. We have now, however, obtained more knowledge on the subject, and there remains no doubt that Mr. Hubbard has actually made a discovery composed of the following parts:

1. Petrified bodies of two human beings about 18 and 15 feet in height respectively. One of these is buried under a recent rock fall which would require several days´ work to remove; the other, of which Mr. Hubbard took photographs, is in a crevice of difficult accessibility. The bodies are formed of a limestone petrification embedded in sandstone.

2. An ancient beach, now sandstone, containing a great number of footprints of a giant race, men, women and children; the prints of adults about 17 to 20 inches in length, and corresponding in size and shape to the Carson City and Blue Ridge prints.

EVEN MORE GIANT RECORDS:

According to a press clipping, dated Nayarit, Mexico, May 14, 1926, Capts. D. W. Page and F. W. Devalda discovered the bones of a race of giants who averaged over ten feet in height. Local legends state that they came from Ecuador. Nothing more has been heard of this, but that is not surprising; the word "giant" will flutter the feathers of any scientist into rapid flight, metaphorically speaking, in the opposite direction. So also with a report from the Washington Post, June 22, 1925, and the New York Herald-Tribune, June 21, 1925. A mining party, it is reported, found skeletons measuring 10 to 12 feet, with feet 18 to 20 inches long, near Sisoguiche, Mexico. The Los Angeles Times, October 2, 1927, says that explorers in Mexico located large human bones near Tapextla, indicating a race of "gigantic size." All this, if unfounded, would be straining coincidence or imagination pretty far.

Press accounts say that the skeleton of a gigantic man, with head missing, has been unearthed at El Boquin, on the Mico River, in the Chontales district. The ribs are a yard long and four inches wide and the shin bone is too heavy for one man to carry. "Chontales" is an Indian word, meaning "wild men."

The earliest records of giants bones findings date before Christ. Here are some of them


600 BC - Sparta finds Orestes' giant bones
500 BC - Kimon discovers giant bones of Thescus
200 BC - Euphorion finds Giant bones in Samos
100 BC - Anteaus's giant bones seen in Morocco
A.D. 1 - Augustus's museum of Giant bones in Capri Tiberius reign
Orontes' giant bones discovered in Syria
A.D. 100 - Ajax's giant bones discovered at Rhoetum
Giant bones displayed in Nitria, Egypt
A.D. 200 - Solinus describes giant bones in Pallene and Crete
A.D. 500 - Giant bones displayed in Constantinople


A. Present day modern man which averages about 6-feet tall + or - several inches or more.
B. 15-foot human skeleton found in S/E Turkey in late 1950's in the Euphrates valley during road construction. Many tombs containing giants were uncovered here.
C. Maximinus Thrax Ceaser of Rome 235-238 A.D. This was an 8' 6" skeleton.
D. A 19'6" human skeleton found in 1577 A.D. under an overturned oak tree in the Canton of Lucerne.
E. 23-foot tall skeleton found in 1456 A.D. beside a river in Valence, France.
F. A 25' 6 " skeleton found in 1613 A.D. near the castle of Chaumont in France. This was claimed to be a nearly complete find.
G. Almost beyond comprehension or believability was the find of the two separate 36-foot human remains uncovered by Carthaginians somewhere between 200-600 B.C.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom