TomNWMI
Full Member
- Feb 5, 2006
- 201
- 103
- Detector(s) used
- X-Terra 705, Equinox 800, Musketeer, Tek G2, Omega and a Fisher ID Edge
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
A well designed auto tracking GB should not respond to any metal ferrous or non. Gold hunters know that tiny gold will track out but also that it only takes a few sweeps away from the target to reset the GB. The small response from tiny gold can be just barely above the level of the ground signal in highly mineralized gold fields.
Minelab has a lot of experience developing machines for hot ground, they are located in Australia after all. That said they do like to throw us a curve ball now and then. I haven't experimented much with auto tacking on the Equinox however, with X-Terra I leave it on all the time. On that machine it did act like an iron pre-filter of sorts aloowing improved see-thru in nails.
Before the release of the X-Terra 70 I was able to use the 30 model which was released earlier. After receiving the 70 it quickly became apparent that something was wrong with the 70 they sent me. It would not see several co-located targets that the 30 hit on easily. Fortunately I remembered my experience from testing and using the Fisher Coinstrike which was that Letting tracking see a bit of the iron pollution in the ground enhanced the detectors performance in iron and by a lot! So I turned tracking on, swung the detector over the iron infested ground a few sweeps and when I went over the location of that signal it came in clear as a bell. If I hadn't done that I would have never known and chalked the 70 up as an also ran to its little brother.
These are my experiences reported as I see it.
So with the Equinox does that make it 6 of one and a half dozen of the other, or is their only one solution to this tracking on, tracking off debate.
Minelab has a lot of experience developing machines for hot ground, they are located in Australia after all. That said they do like to throw us a curve ball now and then. I haven't experimented much with auto tacking on the Equinox however, with X-Terra I leave it on all the time. On that machine it did act like an iron pre-filter of sorts aloowing improved see-thru in nails.
Before the release of the X-Terra 70 I was able to use the 30 model which was released earlier. After receiving the 70 it quickly became apparent that something was wrong with the 70 they sent me. It would not see several co-located targets that the 30 hit on easily. Fortunately I remembered my experience from testing and using the Fisher Coinstrike which was that Letting tracking see a bit of the iron pollution in the ground enhanced the detectors performance in iron and by a lot! So I turned tracking on, swung the detector over the iron infested ground a few sweeps and when I went over the location of that signal it came in clear as a bell. If I hadn't done that I would have never known and chalked the 70 up as an also ran to its little brother.
These are my experiences reported as I see it.
So with the Equinox does that make it 6 of one and a half dozen of the other, or is their only one solution to this tracking on, tracking off debate.