English buckle?

mintcombo

Tenderfoot
Nov 24, 2015
7
42
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Just got my first detector - this stuff is fun :D Found this near a 1700's English fort in the Caribbean (West Indies). Is this a buckle? 2016-08-30 18.12.09.jpg2016-08-30 18.10.31.jpg2016-08-30 18.31.28.jpg
 

Last edited:
Upvote 19
Knowing which fort in the Caribbean would probably narrow it down. But I agree this could be a very rare find.:thumbsup:

SS
I agree SS ...... Fort Royal , name change to Fort George in 1785 in St. George, Grenada had a Caribbean Black volunteer unit known as the Royal Etrangers
 

I agree SS ...... Fort Royal , name change to Fort George in 1785 in St. George, Grenada had a Caribbean Black volunteer unit known as the Royal Etrangers

I gave it a good look and can now see how I could have Rangers in it. I couldn't see it before but the a and n could be touching making it look like different letters.
 

I don't think this is a English Buckle.

SS
 

Great plate. Any marked plate like this is easily a banner find!

I think it might be Royal West India Rangers. Edit: Thinking a little more I would assume the plate would match the button having a crown in the center, so maybe this is not correct. I think some of the more well know British units had varieties of buttons and plates that didn't always match.. but I would imagine this was a very small unit, and would match.

Provincial Archives of New Brunswick


The belt plate from the uniform of this button.

https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-us/...0010/lot-41141405-6d45-4917-a061-a53d00b3aa67
 

Attachments

  • 540x360.jpg
    540x360.jpg
    25 KB · Views: 78
Last edited:
Great plate. Any marked plate like this is easily a banner find!

I think it might be [FONT=Arial, Helvetica] Royal West India Rangers.[/FONT]

Provincial Archives of New Brunswick


The belt plate from the uniform of this button.

https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-us/...0010/lot-41141405-6d45-4917-a061-a53d00b3aa67

Well I like it enough that, and with your explanation, I'm going to put in a BANNER vote. This is an awesome piece of history and likely wicked rare!
 

Can't confirm an ID, but don't have to, to say it's rare. All early marked military plates are.
 

Last edited:
Knowing which fort in the Caribbean would probably narrow it down. But I agree this could be a very rare find.:thumbsup:

SS

Apparently The Original poster doesn't want to give up location , somewhere in the West Indies :icon_scratch:
I can understand his reasons but getting the Regt without the fort is a dead end street ....
Hey mintcombo , Where are you ???
 

Apparently The Original poster doesn't want to give up location , somewhere in the West Indies :icon_scratch:
I can understand his reasons but getting the Regt without the fort is a dead end street ....
Hey mintcombo , Where are you ???

He apparently doesn't have a lot of interest in his find...participating in the forum, or what other have had to say about the find ?

Is possible digging too near a fort he wasn't supposed to be ? It would be nice to know where though.

It is a great story about what can happen out there. "just got my first detector" and BAM major find. I wish I could make a find similar to this.
 

Can't confirm an ID, but don't have to, to say it's rare. All early marked military plates are.

I agree with that, its clearly at least a very rare plate. I still think it might be a small colonial unit (maybe the one your guessing) that had very poor quality engravers. Our ones of that period have a finer finish to the letters for example.
 

Can't help at all with the ID, but have to agree that is one cool find! Thanks for sharing.
 

Yeah I would hesitate to vote banner if the finder is not going to communicate or help with the I.D. I am betting also though that it is a rare find anyways. I can't believe you guys are stumped?
Think we should move it to the what is it section?
 

Yeah I would hesitate to vote banner if the finder is not going to communicate or help with the I.D. I am betting also though that it is a rare find anyways. I can't believe you guys are stumped?
Think we should move it to the what is it section?

I'm just dying to get a positive ID. I can't believe everyone is stumped either! It must be scarce
 

Definitely a banner worthy find, hopefully the OP will return and join in on the conversation.
 

I agree with that, its clearly at least a very rare plate. I still think it might be a small colonial unit (maybe the one your guessing) that had very poor quality engravers. Our ones of that period have a finer finish to the letters for example.


The engraving may also be an indication my ID is wrong.... because the buttons are very well done. Have a feeling it's something different... but still most definitely a banner find.
 

What strikes me as being odd is how nicely the design on the plate is done in comparison to how poorly the lettering is done.
 

There was a Royal Niger Company and I've also found reference to a Royal Niger Regiment.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/HILL-COLONIAL-TROOPS-SWEET-AMERICAN-ROYAL-NIGER-REGIMENT-/361587712223

This would fit the clearly visible letters RNIGERS. Doesn't explain the fainter S or E before it though and they were only formed in 1890. I know nothing about the dating of this kind of plate but judging by previous responses it looks like 1890 would be too late for this style of plate?
 

As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
What strikes me as being odd is how nicely the design on the plate is done in comparison to how poorly the lettering is done.

I was thinking the same thing. Almost looks like the owner/wearer hand-inscribed the letters at the bottom after the plate was made. That would explain why no one has been able to find a similar one for a positive id.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top