Dowsing Meteorite differences

I'm surprised again!
I dowsed this target W, and a target E of me. I shift the Elements in the target. This is what dowses in the connection line.
Iron & Stony meteorite
Carbon
Cobalt
Oxygen
Manganese
Zinc
Tin
Nickle
Chromium
Copper
Silver
Gold
Ytterbium
Iron
Lead
I'm surprised and confused!
No Iridium?? Is it a meteorite or earth rock?
They say, not all meteorites have Iridium, but they all have Nickle.. I'll call this a Meteorite.. but not the other..
 

Here is the target to the East..
Titanium
Carbon
Iridium
Oxygen
Manganese
Zinc
Tin
Yttrbium
Platinum
Iron
Olivene
No Nickle?? Plus this has Olivene!
Is this a Meteorite, or Earh rock? It doesn't signal with my Iron or Stony meteorite.. Must be Earth..
The more I look into it, all these are in Lunar meteorites, xcept Tin it says.. And they associate with olivene on earth and the moon.. And some lunar meteorites didn't have Nickle.. It's 16 ft deep on state land anyhow.. Could be a Chondrite from our moon.. ??
I have 3 more Element samples coming. Silicon, Potassium, Calcium..
 

The more I look into it, all these are in Lunar meteorites, xcept Tin it says.. And they associate with olivene on earth and the moon.. And some lunar meteorites didn't have Nickle.. It's 16 ft deep on state land anyhow.. Could be a Chondrite from our moon.. ??
I have 3 more Element samples coming. Silicon, Potassium, Calcium..

There are no lunar chondrites. Chondrules arise in meteorites that have not been modified by either melting or differentiation of their parent body. A few rare dust-sized micrometeorites found in the Antarctic are believed to have come from the lunar regolith and the Apollo missions have brought back fragmentary samples of chondritic meteorites from the lunar surface. These are thought to be remnants of impactors onto the moon (primarily carbonaceous chondrites) and there is one unique chondritic specimen (from the Apollo 12 mission) which is petrologically and chemically distinct from other chondrites and lunar rocks.
 

I figured out that dowsing single meteorites, leads to more deep targets, that I can't get to, than shallow.. So I figured I would give up on singles, and concentrate on strewn fields. Any Meteorite strewn fields would be a wide signal, easy to tell. Most likely near the surface, still together.
The guy I bought my first Dowsing machine from, had found some in Nevada.. They should be here in National Forest somewhere, we have lots of that by me. In AZ, I used to drive every 2 miles, I'd get out and dowse ahead. I'll probably do that here.. Dowse for Meteorite strewn fields!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20241208_204602428.jpg
    IMG_20241208_204602428.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 6
More signal Elements came, Carbon, Calcium, Potassium.
The Calcium signals one Meteorite, and the Potassium signales the Luner meteorite.. from in my house.
 

Attachments

  • 20241230_162418.jpg
    20241230_162418.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 1
I'm all set for Spring Meteorite hunts. I learned that Sleeping bear national lakeshore, is open for Detecting.. It's a lot of area and some supposed lost treasures. I'll be happy to dig any Meteorites or treasure in the sand dunes.. All the green area.. I'll be Dowsing! , just a shovel, no detector.
My big spring treasure dowsing proof is scheduled for March, a diffrent State than I'm in.. if things work out..
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241230_163002_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241230_163002_Chrome.jpg
    77.8 KB · Views: 2
The main signal I'm hoping to dowse is Meteorite strewn fields. A wider signal coming from the source, makes them stick out. I have found one with 7 stones, but State land and too deep.
There is plenty of single targets to weed out. It's easy to get above a Meteorite, but it takes a couple minutes to dowse the depth, depending on where it's located.
To speed things up, I'd like to eventually use a good deep detector! I don't need anything expensive, no discrimination!. I'm only after Iron/Nickle meteorites. Maybe one that can detect the size of a baseball at 6 ft.. Is there anything cheap for that?
I didn't realize there is 7 types of Meteorites, but it says, even the Stony Silica types, have Iron, and are magnetic..
 

My Silicon signal came. It won't do me much good, because both Meteorites and the Ore deposit signal with it. It's only good for the letters Si, if I ever made a frequency number cypher..
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250102_071250_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20250102_071250_Gallery.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 1
Out of all my signal Elements, these are my Meteorite signals I'll take out Dowsing..
Iron, Nickle, Olivene, Lead, Uranium, Taenite Meteorite peice. That should be enough to determine if it is a space rock or Earth rock, from great distance.. Dowsing!
Lead might be a holy grail signal, along with Taenite. I dowse a Lead connection to both distant Meteorites, but no Uranium to either. The Uranium signal is for any master key frequency. The targets are either Meteorites, heavily mineralized earth rocks, or a mimic frequency..
 

Attachments

  • 20250102_071032.jpg
    20250102_071032.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 1
The main signal I'm hoping to dowse is Meteorite strewn fields. A wider signal coming from the source, makes them stick out. I have found one with 7 stones, but State land and too deep.
There is plenty of single targets to weed out. It's easy to get above a Meteorite, but it takes a couple minutes to dowse the depth, depending on where it's located.
To speed things up, I'd like to eventually use a good deep detector! I don't need anything expensive, no discrimination!. I'm only after Iron/Nickle meteorites. Maybe one that can detect the size of a baseball at 6 ft.. Is there anything cheap for that?
I didn't realize there is 7 types of Meteorites, but it says, even the Stony Silica types, have Iron, and are magnetic..

There are considerably more than 7 types of meteorite. Within the 3 main classes there are (at least) 6 classifications of carbonaceous chondrites; 2 classifications of enstatite chondrites; 4 classifications of ordinary chondrites; 1 classification of K chondrites; 3 classifications of primitive achondrites; 12 classifications of primitive chondrites; 5 classifications of stony irons; and 5 classifications of irons.

The presence of iron and magnetic attraction of stony meteorites depends on which of the above classes they fall into. You may know a lot about dowsing, but you continue to demonstrate how little you actually know about meteorites (including information which you have found on the net but misinterpreted).


Out of all my signal Elements, these are my Meteorite signals I'll take out Dowsing..
Iron, Nickle, Olivene, Lead, Uranium, Taenite Meteorite peice. That should be enough to determine if it is a space rock or Earth rock, from great distance.. Dowsing!
Lead might be a holy grail signal, along with Taenite. I dowse a Lead connection to both distant Meteorites, but no Uranium to either. The Uranium signal is for any master key frequency. The targets are either Meteorites, heavily mineralized earth rocks, or a mimic frequency..

What makes you think that lead in meteorites will be a useful indicator for your dowsing activities? In nickel-irons, it ranges between zero in high-nickel ataxites though to about 25ppm in lower-nickel octahedrites. There will be considerably more lead in every conventional battery of the cars on the driveways all around you than in meteorites “at great distance”.

Uranium is also a non-starter since the levels in meteorites are both tiny and typically only about a third of the background levels found in the millions of tons of Earth’s mantle you’re sitting on.

Perhaps some time before the next Ice Age, you will show us a verified meteorite that you have found using these techniques… as opposed to telling us that your signals indicate they must be there but providing excuses why you can’t recover them.
 

I don't claim to know anything about Meteorites, you've been reading my posts, as I buy Elements, as I figure things out .
Lead signals into both Meteorites I Dowse from my house. I'm gonna use it! I don't want to take and dowse every elements I have, I narrowed it down.. Should I use a different Element?
Im taking Uranium, not for Meteorites, but for mimic frequencies, and I wrote that.
I'm all set for after this snow melts, yes! Of course you'll get your pics..
 

My buddy asked if my ability got better, because I had totally lost the dowsing signal for the last 4 yrs plus, and now I can dowse better than ever.. No, other than experience, it had to do with the wrong rods I was using.. Improper conduction! That simple!
Meteorite Dowsing is simple, not my first rodeo. I chased many Meteorite signals in Arizona in the past. But they were all large. That's why I've been practicing on smaller ones, strewn fields.. Large Meteorites aren't near the surface around me, so I have to switch to smaller ones..
I'm in signal crossfire from all other existing elements, and their connections.. I've chosen my Elements wisely!
 

I would like some Osmosium, but a gram is expensive. I'll order a half gram this spring, along with some Bloodwood, for new rod handles..
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250102-184337~2.png
    Screenshot_20250102-184337~2.png
    60.4 KB · Views: 1
This is good Meteorite information for Michigan, and Strewn fields are suggested!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250101_065922_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20250101_065922_Facebook.jpg
    150.5 KB · Views: 4
  • Screenshot_20250104_072155_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20250104_072155_Chrome.jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 5
This is good Meteorite information for Michigan, and Strewn fields are suggested!

Screenshot_20250101_065922_Facebook (1).jpg

With all due respect to "Keith Jackson - Geologist" and just so’s you know, although that image has been used in numerous (ill-informed) articles about meteorites, including one on the 2021 Hinchcombe fall in England, it’s NOT a meteorite. There are no meteorites which look like that.

It’s actually a piece of terrestrial vesicular basalt, bordering on pumice. The picture was taken by the Serbian photographer Robert Semnic in 2015 and uploaded to various stock libraries with incorrect captions.

Here it is, incorrectly captioned as “Meteorite, isolated on white”:

https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/meteorite-gm495958232-76774013

… and here, more or less correctly captioned as “Lava stone. Big chunk of black lava isolated, lunar like, isolated on white”:

https://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-images-lava-stone-image22980939
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top