Different Ways of Testing LRLs

[aarthrj3811]

And when I say few, I think that here, on probably the largest treasure hunting forum in the World, many more than three or four successful LRL hunters would surely speak up, regardless of any "non-belivers" rebutting them. And, by the nature of the vast majority of the comments by the three or four LRLers that do post here, I think anyone with common sense would seriously doubt that they are actually successful at anything other than accepting under-the-table gratuities from the manufacturers.

Over 60 LRL owners have told of their success on this forum…It is their choice if they want to rebut the nonsense on this forum..If you would go to the Manufacturers websites you would find many more testimonials and finds by owners of LRL’s..

I think anyone with common sense would seriously doubt that they are actually successful at anything other than accepting under-the-table gratuities from the manufacturers.

Please prove that claim ?

Other than all that, like I have said many times on here before, I have no reason to doubt that dowsing can work for some people, but I also have no first hand knowledge that it does, either. However, I do have strong reason to believe that LRLs are totally fraudulent.

Thank you again for your personal opinions

And that the LRLers who do post here, claim to be totally unable to see the simple logic above, is, realistically, an additional major strike against their credibility.

Yes we reject your logic..Art

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

Long Range Locators have already been "explained" by National Labs, the FBI, Department of Defense, US Navy and a Court of Law. Fraudulent instruments, no reasonable scientific basis and works no better than random chance (guessing).

Rumors

 

[EE THr]

And when I say few, I think that here, on probably the largest treasure hunting forum in the World, many more than three or four successful LRL hunters would surely speak up, regardless of any "non-belivers" rebutting them. And, by the nature of the vast majority of the comments by the three or four LRLers that do post here, I think anyone with common sense would seriously doubt that they are actually successful at anything other than accepting under-the-table gratuities from the manufacturers.

Over 60 LRL owners have told of their success on this forum…It is their choice if they want to rebut the nonsense on this forum..If you would go to the Manufacturers websites you would find many more testimonials and finds by owners of LRL’s..

I think anyone with common sense would seriously doubt that they are actually successful at anything other than accepting under-the-table gratuities from the manufacturers.

Please prove that claim ?

Other than all that, like I have said many times on here before, I have no reason to doubt that dowsing can work for some people, but I also have no first hand knowledge that it does, either. However, I do have strong reason to believe that LRLs are totally fraudulent.

Thank you again for your personal opinions

And that the LRLers who do post here, claim to be totally unable to see the simple logic above, is, realistically, an additional major strike against their credibility.

Yes we reject your logic..Art

Your "60 owners" is a claim, so show the 60 owners.

I, however, made it plain that I was stating my opinions, not claims.

And, I know that you reject the logic of my post, and that's exactly whay I had said, so thank you for confirming my statement.

Your whole post, in fact, confirms that statement, and your credibility is zero. But that's not my doing, it's yours. I merely posted my observations of it.

You have degraded yourself to the point that you are just a joke now.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Long Range Locators have already been "explained" by National Labs, the FBI, Department of Defense, US Navy and a Court of Law. Fraudulent instruments, no reasonable scientific basis and works no better than random chance (guessing).

Rumors

And that attitude, con-artie, is why nobody in their right mind would ever believe anything you ever said, or ever will say.

It makes all your efforts posting, just a waste of your time, and actually has a very negative impact on the LRL manufacturers. Which is, in my opinion, a very good thing.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Your "60 owners" is a claim, so show the 60 owners.
I, however, made it plain that I was stating my opinions, not claims.

Your opinions look like claims to me.

And, I know that you reject the logic of my post, and that's exactly whay I had said, so thank you for confirming my statement.
Yes I do.
Your whole post, in fact, confirms that statement, and your credibility is zero. But that's not my doing, it's yours. I merely posted my observations of it.
You have degraded yourself to the point that you are just a joke now.

You and the other skeptics “opinions” of me make no difference. I will keep right on postint the truth.

And that attitude, con-artie, is why nobody in their right mind would ever believe anything you ever said, or ever will say.

It makes all your efforts posting, just a waste of your time, and actually has a very negative impact on the LRL manufacturers. Which is, in my opinion, a very good thing.

What I choice to do with my time is my decision..Art

 

[EE THr]

con-artie;

Quit trying to evade the question and answer it: Who are these alleged "60 users on the forum"?

I don't see 60 users.

What I see is 3 LRL promoters.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Only to the illiterate, who cannot comprehend what they have read
To other adults...that is reliable references and sources.

A references can take on many forms, including: a thought, a sensory perception that is audible (onomatopoeia), visual (text), olfactory, or tactile, emotional state, relationship with other[2], spacetime coordinate, symbolic or alpha-numeric, a physical object or an energy projection; but, other concrete and abstract contexts exist as methods of defining references within the scope of the various fields that require an origin, point of departure, or an original form. This includes methods that intentionally hide the reference from some observers, as in cryptography.

Quit trying to evade the question and answer it: Who are these alleged "60 users on the forum"?

Hey Tiny Buddy..How about you doing some of the work…If you want the names of the LRL Owner/operators go fish

I'm not a skeptic, but an Electrical Engineer that has presented enough evidence showing these devices to be fraudulent and not capable of performing as advertised.

So all your information is based on the advertisements ?..Art

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Trying to stretch definitions and giving emotional excuses does not excuse them from the necessity to prove claims, especially of products which are aggressively marketed for high profit.

So…When do you stop making excuses for having no proof and start proving the 100’s of claims you have made..Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

Trying to stretch definitions and giving emotional excuses does not excuse them from the necessity to prove claims, especially of products which are aggressively marketed for high profit.

So…When do you stop making excuses for having no proof and start proving the 100’s of claims you have made..Art

Another #14, for the umpteenth time.

Do you have one leg shorter than the other? Because you always travel in circles. Just sayin'....





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Saturna]

So all your information is based on the advertisements ?..Art

No, but it appears yours is...

So, why don't we? Where is it?

On the manufacturers Web Sites.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

I'm not a skeptic, but an Electrical Engineer that has presented enough evidence showing these devices to be fraudulent and not capable of performing as advertised.

~Art~

So all your information is based on the advertisements ?..Art

~Saturna~

No, but it appears yours is...
So, why don't we? Where is it?
On the manufacturers Web Sites.

Easiest place to view the finds you keep begging for..Art

 

[Saturna]

Here's a word of advice Arthur.

A manufacturer's ads, for the products they sell for money, aren't the best source for unbiased information. Surprise !

 

[EE THr]

~SWR~

I'm not a skeptic, but an Electrical Engineer that has presented enough evidence showing these devices to be fraudulent and not capable of performing as advertised.

~Art~

So all your information is based on the advertisements ?..Art

~Saturna~

No, but it appears yours is...
So, why don't we? Where is it?
On the manufacturers Web Sites.

Easiest place to view the finds you keep begging for..Art

Why is it that the manufacturers are the only ones supposedly finding treasure?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Why is it that the manufacturers are the only ones supposedly finding treasure?

Sorry about that..I assumed that the Skeptics were smart enough to look under “TESTIMONIALS:…ART

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Saturna~

Here's a word of advice Arthur.
A manufacturer's ads, for the products they sell for money, aren't the best source for unbiased information. Surprise !

Yes it is just terrible that those 1000’s of bias satisfied consumers post their stories and photo’s on those types of web sites…Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

Why is it that the manufacturers are the only ones supposedly finding treasure?

Sorry about that..I assumed that the Skeptics were smart enough to look under “TESTIMONIALS:…ART

We've been here before, same result, con-artie.

#18.

Anybody can write a fake testimonial. It is no substitute for proof.

Besides, if the testimonials were true, you could pass Carl's test---and you can't!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

~Saturna~

Here's a word of advice Arthur.
A manufacturer's ads, for the products they sell for money, aren't the best source for unbiased information. Surprise !

Yes it is just terrible that those 1000’s of bias satisfied consumers post their stories and photo’s on those types of web sites…Art

"1000's" means 2000 or more.

Can you show links to that many?

Nope!

How easy the lies slip out of you. Then you slip on them!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Anybody can write a fake testimonial. It is no substitute for proof.
"1000's" means 2000 or more.
Can you show links to that many?
Nope!

How easy the lies slip out of you. Then you slip on them!

Gee EE…You claim that all LRL’s are fake because of the advertising..So your claim is false if you do not have the links and have not read every one of them..Heck..I do not know every LRL manufacturer in the world…I doubt if you can even name five of them…Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

Anybody can write a fake testimonial. It is no substitute for proof.
"1000's" means 2000 or more.
Can you show links to that many?
Nope!

How easy the lies slip out of you. Then you slip on them!

Gee EE…You claim that all LRL’s are fake because of the advertising..So your claim is false if you do not have the links and have not read every one of them..Heck..I do not know every LRL manufacturer in the world…I doubt if you can even name five of them…Art

Then how do you know there are 2000 or more stories with photos on their Websites?


Caught in another lie, con-artie!


Classid #11. Again!






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Then how do you know there are 2000 or more stories with photos on their Websites?

An educated guess..With 8500 units sold by only 15 of the manufactures I would say that is a good guess based on what I know…So prove that there is less than 2000 “TESTIMONIALS” on the internet…After all they can tell their stories and show the Photo’s and no one calls them names..Art