Cubfan64
Silver Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2006
- Messages
- 3,001
- Reaction score
- 2,858
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- New Hampshire - USA
- Detector(s) used
- Fisher CZ21, Teknetics T2 & Minelab Sovereign GT
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
You can't change the words of a newspaper article just because it fits your theory. The fact is, the way the newspaper article is written it's VERY CLEAR the implication is that the "quartz" is a mine about a mile farther away from the "placer." even if you remove the comma, the meaning is exactly the same - the word "farther" is the key - farther than what? Markmar believes it refers back to the camp, but it again VERY CLEARLY as written with or without the comma means "farther from the placer."
The author of the article otherwise could have said, "From their camp they could walk a mile to the "placer" and the "quartz," a second mine."
Incidentally, I have no idea what Hermann actually said to the reporter - all we have to go by is what was written and the english language is very clear that the "farther than" comment refers to the placer and not the camp.
I also agree with Dave, this is all moot anyways because Hermann would never have told a newspaper reporter ANYTHING that would potentially lead someone to the mine.
The author of the article otherwise could have said, "From their camp they could walk a mile to the "placer" and the "quartz," a second mine."
Incidentally, I have no idea what Hermann actually said to the reporter - all we have to go by is what was written and the english language is very clear that the "farther than" comment refers to the placer and not the camp.
I also agree with Dave, this is all moot anyways because Hermann would never have told a newspaper reporter ANYTHING that would potentially lead someone to the mine.
Last edited: