Alpha137
Jr. Member
- Jan 5, 2017
- 48
- 84
- Detector(s) used
- Equinox 800, Xterra 705
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- Thread starter
- #21
I would refer you to a previous post I made here on TNet a couple-three years ago that contained a bunch of useful links about Spanish law regarding mining in Mexico, plus some information about who contracted to pay for and organize the expeditions, work the mines, and how the proceeds were to be divided. Unfortunately, now I can't search back far enough in my old posts to find it. Regardless, anyone who's interested enough in the subject can certainly educate himself if he wants true facts. I say this because so many TNet posters have gotten the wrong idea about how the old system worked. It's understandable since so many other posters try to convince us that there are hundreds if not thousands of "Spanish treasure caches" all over America just waiting to be found. First thought then: decide if you want to be real or fantasize.
Thought two: getting back to a site was a problem that the miner had to work out for himself, using his own methods. Carvings, cairns, maps, whatever floated his boat. In today's Southwest, there are very few true "Spanish" mines, IMO. The contractors, who paid for the operations, had so much better value choices to be exploited in Mexico than here. Try to erase from your mind the idea of a "King's Code" for marking mines, ala Kenworthy and others. There was none in use in the Southwest. That's internet fake news.
Most pre-Anglo workings found are Mexican. Most of these were found by Anglos in the 1850s and claimed as their own. And were worked out.
Third thought: your alchemical and VF examples are non-native, meaning somebody probably well-educated carved them for a reason. The rest you can ignore, although a good trick was to hide modern info among native carvings. In your case, I'd focus on that Mercury thing with the circled dots and other two circles. It may be a sort of code urging you along, or just a "Hey look" carving because it's so different from all the rest in the area. Either way, someone presumably did it for a good reason.
Fourth thought: when you post on TNet, or any other forum, the material is in the public domain and anyone can use it. I think also that TNet also has some sort of rights to the content. Check the rules.
I am definitely focused on finding out what is the actual reality of these things. Fantasizing about what could be would get me nowhere. It is detective work and there is tons of contradicting and fanciful information out there. Thinking things through and following logic never hurt anyone. I would love to see the link you are talking about. A question about the miner using his own markers to get back to a site. Would the miners be freelancers or government entities working for the crown and/or church? It seems that if they were exploring for the gov that they would document things within a system, and possibly do things so others could find what the miner found. That idea is what was behind my comment that you were speaking to. If he was working only for himself then my idea would probably be useless.
As far as public domain goes that is fine. I just didn't want GPS locations revealed in any forgotten exif data. I have removed it, but if I forget to remove it on a picture or something before I post a picture I was wondering if it is retrievable. Some forums automatically strip exif data when pictures are uploaded. I can't find info regarding if that happens here or not.