itmaiden
Hero Member
- Sep 28, 2005
- 575
- 7
- Thread starter
- #21
Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...
Actually, after zooming in to 400x's to the photo, the right eye is still in it's socket and there is some flesh still covering the forehead and that side of the face (the iris/pupil area is still evident). The right arm and hand is partially visible with a sleeve pulled up close to the elbow. The head still has hair with a part in approximately the same location as Natalee's was the night the vanished. ( I did consider this could be a different more recent skeleton, since there was still flesh intact). The arm lengths and elbow bends are both properly proportionate to a body, and so is an area that may be a pubic bone area.
I am now 100% convinced this is the missing girl. While it has been 5 years, a body could have been taken out to the water at any time. If the water conditions are right, some preservation is still possible.
You divers are used to seeing skeletons that are hundreds of years old. We must also consider the age of the person and maybe with all the alcohol she was well preserved.
Did you know some alcoholic beverages contain formaldehyde ?
itmaiden
Actually, after zooming in to 400x's to the photo, the right eye is still in it's socket and there is some flesh still covering the forehead and that side of the face (the iris/pupil area is still evident). The right arm and hand is partially visible with a sleeve pulled up close to the elbow. The head still has hair with a part in approximately the same location as Natalee's was the night the vanished. ( I did consider this could be a different more recent skeleton, since there was still flesh intact). The arm lengths and elbow bends are both properly proportionate to a body, and so is an area that may be a pubic bone area.
I am now 100% convinced this is the missing girl. While it has been 5 years, a body could have been taken out to the water at any time. If the water conditions are right, some preservation is still possible.
You divers are used to seeing skeletons that are hundreds of years old. We must also consider the age of the person and maybe with all the alcohol she was well preserved.
Did you know some alcoholic beverages contain formaldehyde ?
itmaiden
Darren in NC said:While resembling a human skull, it simply isn't one. There's no jawbone, eye sockets, cheekbones or the like. Forensic experts clearly state that the formation is not a skeleton. I'll place my bets with them.