Cmon guys/gals help out with this...

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

Actually, after zooming in to 400x's to the photo, the right eye is still in it's socket and there is some flesh still covering the forehead and that side of the face (the iris/pupil area is still evident). The right arm and hand is partially visible with a sleeve pulled up close to the elbow. The head still has hair with a part in approximately the same location as Natalee's was the night the vanished. ( I did consider this could be a different more recent skeleton, since there was still flesh intact). The arm lengths and elbow bends are both properly proportionate to a body, and so is an area that may be a pubic bone area.

I am now 100% convinced this is the missing girl. While it has been 5 years, a body could have been taken out to the water at any time. If the water conditions are right, some preservation is still possible.

You divers are used to seeing skeletons that are hundreds of years old. We must also consider the age of the person and maybe with all the alcohol she was well preserved.

Did you know some alcoholic beverages contain formaldehyde ?

itmaiden







Darren in NC said:
While resembling a human skull, it simply isn't one. There's no jawbone, eye sockets, cheekbones or the like. Forensic experts clearly state that the formation is not a skeleton. I'll place my bets with them.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

What does this have to do with shipwrecks? This should be moved to "everything else."
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

I hate to tell you this, but after 2 years underwater there would be NO FLESH Left on the body. It would not only have deteriorated, it also would have been eaten by fish and crabs.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

itmaiden said:
Actually, after zooming in to 400x's to the photo, the right eye is still in it's socket and there is some flesh still covering the forehead and that side of the face (the iris/pupil area is still evident). The right arm and hand is partially visible with a sleeve pulled up close to the elbow. The head still has hair with a part in approximately the same location as Natalee's was the night the vanished. ( I did consider this could be a different more recent skeleton, since there was still flesh intact). The arm lengths and elbow bends are both properly proportionate to a body, and so is an area that may be a pubic bone area.




I am now 100% convinced this is the missing girl. While it has been 5 years, a body could have been taken out to the water at any time. If the water conditions are right, some preservation is still possible.

You divers are used to seeing skeletons that are hundreds of years old. We must also consider the age of the person and maybe with all the alcohol she was well preserved.

Did you know some alcoholic beverages contain formaldehyde ?

itmaiden







Darren in NC said:
While resembling a human skull, it simply isn't one. There's no jawbone, eye sockets, cheekbones or the like. Forensic experts clearly state that the formation is not a skeleton. I'll place my bets with them.


I have to agree, It does look like A body. But after further analysis, I believe it is A spanish conquistador with his body armor still on.(Which would explain why he did not float.) ;D
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

It doesn't, except the picture is taken near an old shipwreck and the fact that the shipwreck forum is the only place to secure the opinion of water depth from experienced divers/salvagers.

itmaiden


Salvor6 said:
What does this have to do with shipwrecks? This should be moved to "everything else."
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

You know I have often wondered if Spanish armor is ever found on any of the salvage sites. I know armor has been found on land by phosphate companies such as "Mosaic" in central Florida.
Spanish armor was also found in Arkansas up by the Current River, along with some coins...most likely from the De Soto expedition.

itmaiden

[/quote]

I have to agree, It does look like A body. But after further analysis, I believe it is A spanish conquistador with his body armor still on.(Which would explain why he did not float.) ;D

[/quote]
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

This "body" has already been checked by law enforcement divers and it is nothing more than coral and bottom debris... it just looked "interesting" in the photo. This was mentioned on CNN this past week.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

Can you back that up with a link to the CNN statement ?
Because Aruba officials before gave up after a couple of days and said they couldn't locate the site, and said they were nto going to continue searching. There hasn't been any news about a "new search". However, last night a new witness that has come forward since the death of Joran's father said he saw a man fitting Joran's description near his house come back in from the water with a show missing and wet from the waist down from what he could see, and then someone who may have been his father coming to pick him up in a hurry in a vehicle fitting the description of one owned by the family.

That is not just coral in the picture. The jaw, teeth, nose bridge, and socket areas are all there. The fingers on the left hand are unmistakable too. May I suggest a better computer monitor ?

itmaiden




PhipsFolly said:
This "body" has already been checked by law enforcement divers and it is nothing more than coral and bottom debris... it just looked "interesting" in the photo. This was mentioned on CNN this past week.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

Boy, Sheila, when you chomp down on something you just won't let go will you? I saw the CNN thing too. By the way, I've got a great monitor and though I see what you are talking about, I have seen things underwater easily mistaken for things they weren't. Ease up...
Aquanut
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

I understand the tricks water and undersea images can play on the eyes, but I'm betting on this one !

Check out the "illusional" image of a shipwreck (most likely 1715) as my "Avatar" ;D

Ships R' Us,

itmaiden





aquanut said:
Boy, Sheila, when you chomp down on something you just won't let go will you? I saw the CNN thing too. By the way, I've got a great monitor and though I see what you are talking about, I have seen things underwater easily mistaken for things they weren't. Ease up...
Aquanut
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

Geez Sheila... just givin' an update on this since you were so interested in this story... don't need to jump down my throat girl... I saw this on (channel 34) CNN just the other day... not on the internet. You will have to do a search on that for yourself. :-\
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

Yep, I too watched the clip on the news a few weeks back. They checked out the spot and it was just coral, no missing body.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

I'm not jumping down your throat Phips, I am a very good natured person, very layed back and seldom get ticked at anything (unless it is corrupt government). I take most things on this board with a good sense of humor, and if something is a little offensive somewhere, I overlook it. Everyone has different opinions, but Aruba is not a place I trust or believe after all that has gone on. CNN ? credible ? ha !

itmaiden




PhipsFolly said:
Geez Sheila... just givin' an update on this since you were so interested in this story... don't need to jump down my throat girl... I saw this on (channel 34) CNN just the other day... not on the internet. You will have to do a search on that for yourself. :-\
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

Did they show the spot on the video ? Bet they didn't ! Hearsay isn't going to cut it with me.

I want to see the EXACT same spot on a new video or in better photos.

Then I will (maybe) be satisfied.

itmaiden



lurediver said:
Yep, I too watched the clip on the news a few weeks back. They checked out the spot and it was just coral, no missing body.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

Just wait till Joran Van der sloot goes to prison in peru,then he will tell where the body is.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

I'm hoping so.

She needs to be found.

itmaiden


FISHEYE said:
Just wait till Joran Van der sloot goes to prison in peru,then he will tell where the body is.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

I don't want to bust your bubble, but I just got back from Charleston SC and when I was down there I was watching TV about the murder in Peru. One of the panel members mentioned the photo you posted and said the the FBI was sent down there and investigated it and found out that it is not what you think. It is not a human skeleton.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

Oh, you won't "bust my bubble". I will hold out for further investigation though.
The FBI is about as reliable as some other government entities I could name.
That is a huge organization and not everyone is equally skilled.


itmaiden


old man said:
I don't want to bust your bubble, but I just got back from Charleston SC and when I was down there I was watching TV about the murder in Peru. One of the panel members mentioned the photo you posted and said the the FBI was sent down there and investigated it and found out that it is not what you think. It is not a human skeleton.
 

Re: C'mon guys/gals help out with this...

itmaiden,

I dont think you will ever be satisfied! ::) Not sure why this has consumed you so much, but I dont think there is much else we can tell you. There are some pretty good experts on this board and their opinions have be squashed.

Most everyone here is under the same consensus: it's not a body, and this image was taken in probably 8-15' of water.

Please let us know if you do find her. Other than that, I think anything further is mute.

Have you contacted the family? I am sure they would love to have someone so dedicated and more reliable than the FBI on the case! :icon_thumleft:

RGecy
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top