ncclaymaker
Sr. Member
- Aug 26, 2011
- 370
- 316
- Detector(s) used
- Minelab 1000, A Motorized Power Glider Trike, 17 foot travel trailer behind my Jeep. 4" suction dredge/high banker.
- Primary Interest:
- Prospecting
For all of those righteous Californians... before you put your dredges into mothballs, buy permits that shouldn't exist, or put up with the nonsense that the bureaucrats create. I have a suggestion. Do a legal "Hail Mary". I believe that my concept of the statute may be legal as they have created it.
The entire issue at hand is simply what constitutes a stream, river or creek? It cannot be by name only, but must pass certain criteria.
1. It must flow the vast majority of the year. It cannot be a dry wash that flows only with the occasional occurrence of rain.
2. Legally designated as a stream, river or creek by history of flowing water.
3. I don't believe that even Sacramento can Californicate what a stream or river is or is not.
Perhaps a little thinking out of the box, lateral thinking, or whatever can be done to end run this insane attitude that the Sacramento bureaucrats have. So enough critique of your great state - here's an example of what I've found. Fire up Google Earth - go to Lat. 33°55'53.77"N, Long 116°38'9.97"W or type in White Water,CA (a couple of miles west of N. Palm Springs)in the "Fly to" search box. This wadi or arroyo is a dry river bed or wash. But, it does on occasion have substantial water flowing in it... only sometimes. Minecache.com indicates old mining is/has occurred here.
We may all have been looking at the very same places that the bureaucrats were looking at. They probably have forgotten about the arid eastern slope that has plenty of snowmelt, but not enough rain to keep the water in the dry washes to create "streams and rivers". I hope that the lights are starting to flicker, but I think most are beginning to see the light.
I've seen plenty of washes that flow only part of the year, then are as dry as a bone for the rest. I don't believe that California considers them streams. Who knows, maybe y'all can end run the SOB's in Sacramento.
Enjoy thinking about this, and I sincerely hope that you guys can drive Fish and Game and the pseudo enviromental experts nuts if I am correct.
The entire issue at hand is simply what constitutes a stream, river or creek? It cannot be by name only, but must pass certain criteria.
1. It must flow the vast majority of the year. It cannot be a dry wash that flows only with the occasional occurrence of rain.
2. Legally designated as a stream, river or creek by history of flowing water.
3. I don't believe that even Sacramento can Californicate what a stream or river is or is not.
Perhaps a little thinking out of the box, lateral thinking, or whatever can be done to end run this insane attitude that the Sacramento bureaucrats have. So enough critique of your great state - here's an example of what I've found. Fire up Google Earth - go to Lat. 33°55'53.77"N, Long 116°38'9.97"W or type in White Water,CA (a couple of miles west of N. Palm Springs)in the "Fly to" search box. This wadi or arroyo is a dry river bed or wash. But, it does on occasion have substantial water flowing in it... only sometimes. Minecache.com indicates old mining is/has occurred here.
We may all have been looking at the very same places that the bureaucrats were looking at. They probably have forgotten about the arid eastern slope that has plenty of snowmelt, but not enough rain to keep the water in the dry washes to create "streams and rivers". I hope that the lights are starting to flicker, but I think most are beginning to see the light.
I've seen plenty of washes that flow only part of the year, then are as dry as a bone for the rest. I don't believe that California considers them streams. Who knows, maybe y'all can end run the SOB's in Sacramento.
Enjoy thinking about this, and I sincerely hope that you guys can drive Fish and Game and the pseudo enviromental experts nuts if I am correct.