Audit: Feds Threw Contracts to Crony Companies

DeepseekerADS

Gold Member
Mar 3, 2013
14,880
21,733
SW, VA - Bull Mountain
Detector(s) used
CTX, Excal II, EQ800, Fisher 1260X, Tesoro Royal Sabre, Tejon, Garrett ADSIII, Carrot, Stealth 920iX, Keene A52
Primary Interest:
Other
Audit: Feds Threw Contracts to Crony Companies

According to the Inspector General for the General Services Administration, managers at the GSA helped their friends in the private sector get lucrative contracts. The stunning report shows that GSA managers routinely overruled contracting officers on certain accounts, including Carahsoft and two large IT contracts with Deloitte and Oracle. The contracts amounted to $900 million in 2011 alone. The IG found, according to the Federal Times, that “After GSA managers intervened in contracting officer decisions, the result was higher-than-appropriate prices for federal customers and a demoralized acquisition staff for GSA.”

The Carahsoft deal created “inflated pricing.” The Deloitte contract increased labor rates. The Oracle contract was extended six months beyond its expiration despite the fact that its labor rates were “extremely high.”

IG Brian Miller stated, “Contracting officers need an environment in which they are free to make judgments, conclusions and findings without undue influence. Independence of contracting officers is crucial to the integrity of the procurement process.”

One of the whistleblowers from within the GSA told the IG, “The pressure is coming from my boss who has told me he doesn’t want Carahsoft to call their congressman … They have already called their congressman before so ... my division director said if we don’t work with them (which means bend the rules that we have in place and make other vendors follow) that they will call the congressman, and he doesn’t want that. I just feel stuck between a rock and a hard place.”

The report did not find actual graft or bribery, but some speculate that GSA officers may be featherbedding for a possible post-government job at some of the favored firms. The report concluded that the GSA’s activities were “not in the best interests of the United States,” and that they “undermined the integrity of the procurement process.
 

metal_detector_vpnavy.gif
IMHO - until the ObamaMedia (i.e., MSNBC, etc.) starts reporting news that truely reflects what the Obama Administration is doing - not a thing will happen. Such a shame...
 

Audit: Feds Threw Contracts to Crony Companies

According to the Inspector General for the General Services Administration, managers at the GSA helped their friends in the private sector get lucrative contracts. The stunning report shows that GSA managers routinely overruled contracting officers on certain accounts, including Carahsoft and two large IT contracts with Deloitte and Oracle. The contracts amounted to $900 million in 2011 alone. The IG found, according to the Federal Times, that “After GSA managers intervened in contracting officer decisions, the result was higher-than-appropriate prices for federal customers and a demoralized acquisition staff for GSA.”

The Carahsoft deal created “inflated pricing.” The Deloitte contract increased labor rates. The Oracle contract was extended six months beyond its expiration despite the fact that its labor rates were “extremely high.”

IG Brian Miller stated, “Contracting officers need an environment in which they are free to make judgments, conclusions and findings without undue influence. Independence of contracting officers is crucial to the integrity of the procurement process.”

One of the whistleblowers from within the GSA told the IG, “The pressure is coming from my boss who has told me he doesn’t want Carahsoft to call their congressman … They have already called their congressman before so ... my division director said if we don’t work with them (which means bend the rules that we have in place and make other vendors follow) that they will call the congressman, and he doesn’t want that. I just feel stuck between a rock and a hard place.”

The report did not find actual graft or bribery, but some speculate that GSA officers may be featherbedding for a possible post-government job at some of the favored firms. The report concluded that the GSA’s activities were “not in the best interests of the United States,” and that they “undermined the integrity of the procurement process.

That's actually a great article.

However, the title has literally nothing to do with the content of the article.
 

metal_detector_vpnavy.gif
IMHO - until the ObamaMedia (i.e., MSNBC, etc.) starts reporting news that truely reflects what the Obama Administration is doing - not a thing will happen. Such a shame...

The information in the article has absolutely nothing to do with the Obama administration.

IG reports are publically available for all to see. No news agency need report on their existence. One must simply seek out the reports and all of this information is available without a FOIA request.
 

ben, the "title" is "Audit: Feds Threw Contracts to Crony Companies"
The very first line of the article is, "According to the Inspector General for the General Services Administration, managers at the GSA helped their friends in the private sector get lucrative contracts."
You see no connection here whatsoever?
 

ben, the "title" is "Audit: Feds Threw Contracts to Crony Companies"
The very first line of the article is, "According to the Inspector General for the General Services Administration, managers at the GSA helped their friends in the private sector get lucrative contracts."
You see no connection here whatsoever?

If you ignore the title and the first sentence the rest of the article presents the actual facts of the IG report.

The title and first sentence is the author's own judgement which bends the REAL facts of this article. It is just a journalistic trick to make the article sound more appealing by giving it a dramatic edge.

Read the actual IG report and then get back to me.
 

They aren't going to state directly in the "audit" what they feel is causing the problem or why these officials are breaking the rules. They will state that rules are being broken and it needs to be fixed. They will direct agencies on specific fixes and will request the agencies state, in detail, how they intend on fixing the problem. Conclusions are reached based on what was found in the audits similar to this one.
“It raises the suspicion that maybe they’re making decisions while working for the government favorable to business in anticipation of working for business,” Maser said. “If they weren’t well-intentioned, you wouldn’t know that for months or years later if they took a job in business.”
There would not be any cause to interfere with a contracting officer's decision on a contract, unless there were irregularities in the contract, if it wasn't going to benefit you in a positive way at some time then or in the future.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top