Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

[EE THr]

HI coffee striker: you posted -->But a car doesn't depend on nano bio-energy to run.

******
Not basically I agree, but the human interface possibly does, as for the universe?

We might be shocked to see where the inital reaction / impulse starts from.

Don Jose de La Mancha

I already know where it starts from, and I wasn't shocked.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

DR.ÖTEK Metal Detector, Waterproof Gold Detector, Pinpoint & Terrain Modes, Professional Metal Detector - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

I already know where it starts from, and I wasn't shocked.
Re: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Has been proven but it does not fit into your skeptics believe system so you ignore all the fact.
Dowsing vs LRL’s

We have been told by our expert non-treasure hunters many fairy tales in the last few months…They have admitted now that we can find treasure with our LRL’s but only because it is just Dowsing..The electronics have nothing to do with what we locate and recover. So as usual I have a few questions.
As a fair Dowser and also a LRL user I will tell you a few facts..I can locate a few flakes of Gold with a set of Dowsing Rods for a distance of @ 70 paces. A Gold Nugget which weights a little less than a ¼ oz for a little less than a ¼ mile. With all 4 of the MFD’s and LRL’s that I own I can find those same targets at a distance of 2 and 3 miles.

Could these experts please explain how this can occur if the electronics have nothing to do with the process ?..Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

I already know where it starts from, and I wasn't shocked.
Re: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Has been proven but it does not fit into your skeptics believe system so you ignore all the fact.
Dowsing vs LRL’s

We have been told by our expert non-treasure hunters many fairy tales in the last few months…They have admitted now that we can find treasure with our LRL’s but only because it is just Dowsing..The electronics have nothing to do with what we locate and recover. So as usual I have a few questions.
As a fair Dowser and also a LRL user I will tell you a few facts..I can locate a few flakes of Gold with a set of Dowsing Rods for a distance of @ 70 paces. A Gold Nugget which weights a little less than a ¼ oz for a little less than a ¼ mile. With all 4 of the MFD’s and LRL’s that I own I can find those same targets at a distance of 2 and 3 miles.

Could these experts please explain how this can occur if the electronics have nothing to do with the process ?..Art

Yes, I am admitting that you can treasure hunt with dowsing rods. And you can also treasure hunt with LRLs, just like their ads say.

But just as their ads fail to say that you can find anything, I will not concede to that, either!



Now, let's get back to the topic title, shall we?







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?[/

 

[aarthrj3811]

Yes, I am admitting that you can treasure hunt with dowsing rods. And you can also treasure hunt with LRLs, just like their ads say.

But just as their ads fail to say that you can find anything, I will not concede to that, either

http://www.rangertell.com/
An estimated 4000 people use Rangertell
Thousands of valuable finds are made daily throughout archaeology, geology and general metal and gemstone detecting. All you need to do with the Examiner is enter a number provided with the unit and tune to a sample for more accuracy. You don't even need samples though with the auto-tune Examiner T-G. The Examiner is finely tuned and generally needs no further adjustment during the locating session. Immediately you can detect gold, silver and other precious metals with the same ten-second process. You can tell how far away and deep by utilizing two easy keys. Shape and weight are just as easy using the keys and dial. The main metal/gems/substance frequencies (25 with the TG or 120 Deluxe & 220 Deluxe 909 II) come with the units. Other frequencies are available within a few hours of request.
CHECK OUT MORE THAN 40 TESTIMONIALS HERE INCLUDING SIX PIECES OF EIGHT, A SILVER CACHE, COINS, GOLD and A SILVER HAUL ALL FOUND WITH THIS INSTRUMENT. SEE MORE PICS AND TALES OF OTHER FINDS THERE.
It is clear that what you say is just what some other skeptic told you…
Why do you want to talk about a fraudulent topic. Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Yes, I am admitting that you can treasure hunt with dowsing rods. And you can also treasure hunt with LRLs, just like their ads say.

But just as their ads fail to say that you can find anything, I will not concede to that, either

http://www.rangertell.com/
An estimated 4000 people use Rangertell
Thousands of valuable finds are made daily throughout archaeology, geology and general metal and gemstone detecting. All you need to do with the Examiner is enter a number provided with the unit and tune to a sample for more accuracy. You don't even need samples though with the auto-tune Examiner T-G. The Examiner is finely tuned and generally needs no further adjustment during the locating session. Immediately you can detect gold, silver and other precious metals with the same ten-second process. You can tell how far away and deep by utilizing two easy keys. Shape and weight are just as easy using the keys and dial. The main metal/gems/substance frequencies (25 with the TG or 120 Deluxe & 220 Deluxe 909 II) come with the units. Other frequencies are available within a few hours of request.
CHECK OUT MORE THAN 40 TESTIMONIALS HERE INCLUDING SIX PIECES OF EIGHT, A SILVER CACHE, COINS, GOLD and A SILVER HAUL ALL FOUND WITH THIS INSTRUMENT. SEE MORE PICS AND TALES OF OTHER FINDS THERE.
It is clear that what you say is just what some other skeptic told you…
Why do you want to talk about a fraudulent topic. Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

1. That thing is not an "LRL."
2. "Immediately you can detect gold, silver and other precious metals" is not the same as "This device will detect gold...." We've been through that before.

This is just proof of what I said!






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Th

at thing is not an "LRL."

Please explain that silly statement

"Immediately you can detect gold, silver and other precious metals" is not the same as "This device will detect gold...." We've been through that before.

B

ut just as their ads fail to say that you can find anything, I will not concede to that, either!

Wow

This is just proof of what I said!

No—just proof that you do not understand the Ad..Art

 

[EE THr]

Th

at thing is not an "LRL."

Please explain that silly statement

"Immediately you can detect gold, silver and other precious metals" is not the same as "This device will detect gold...." We've been through that before.

B

ut just as their ads fail to say that you can find anything, I will not concede to that, either!

Wow

This is just proof of what I said!

No—just proof that you do not understand the Ad..Art

Well, if it's true, go collect the $25,000.00 then!

Should we notify Carl that you want to sign up?

What date would be convenient for you?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Well, if it's true, then go collect the $25,000.00 then!
Should we notify Carl that you want to sign up?
What date would be convenient for you?

How does a fake test that will only prove if one man can or can not use his LRL prove that using a LRL is More Than Just Dowsing?...Art

 

[fenixdigger]

If they really wanted to SEE the difference, they would do the SHO-NUFF experiment, then take the sample out and try it.

That would be LRL vs DOWSING

 

[aarthrj3811]

If they really wanted to SEE the difference, they would do the SHO-NUFF experiment, then take the sample out and try it.

That would be LRL vs DOWSING

Real simple..If they do not read it on a Skeptic web site it can not be done..They are afraid to burst their precious belief system that Randi has taught them.. Art

 

[EE THr]

Well, if it's true, then go collect the $25,000.00 then!
Should we notify Carl that you want to sign up?
What date would be convenient for you?

How does a fake test that will only prove if one man can or can not use his LRL prove that using a LRL is More Than Just Dowsing?...Art

Even your buddie EddieR says it's not fake, it's a fair test.

That's all you need is to prove one man can do it, to collect the $25,000.00.

 

[EE THr]

If they really wanted to SEE the difference, they would do the SHO-NUFF experiment, then take the sample out and try it.

That would be LRL vs DOWSING

We already told you folks that we are not dowsers.

Since you claim to have the ability, then you are the people who should prove it. And Carl will give you the $25,000.00.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

If they really wanted to SEE the difference, they would do the SHO-NUFF experiment, then take the sample out and try it.

That would be LRL vs DOWSING

Real simple..If they do not read it on a Skeptic web site it can not be done..They are afraid to burst their precious belief system that Randi has taught them.. Art

All insults and no data, and certainly no proof of your claims. All you have left is childish insults.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Let me "guess" again. 4 Replies about why "we can't do it" or several lame'ish reasons with a side of insult and carl's test for dessert.

SHO-NUFF

 

[EE THr]

Well, if it's true, then go collect the $25,000.00 then!
Should we notify Carl that you want to sign up?
What date would be convenient for you?

How does a fake test that will only prove if one man can or can not use his LRL prove that using a LRL is More Than Just Dowsing?...Art

Like I already told you con-artie, that's whole point, and if you can pass it, you get the $25,000.00.

Beyond that, what do you care?

 

[EE THr]

Let me "guess" again. 4 Replies about why "we can't do it" or several lame'ish reasons with a side of insult and carl's test for dessert.

SHO-NUFF

It seems that one of the fenix brothers has the challengers on Ignore, and talks to the air about what he thinks we might have said.

What fun.

Another one of them peeks sometimes, and yet another peeks all of the time.

So there must be at least three, but some of them may be duplicating what some of the others do, so there's no way to be sure yet.

You just can't make this stuff up!

 

[aarthrj3811]

Let me "guess" again. 4 Replies about why "we can't do it" or several lame'ish reasons with a side of insult and carl's test for dessert.
Just more excuses because they are afraid of Coat Hangers and the truth they will prove..Art

 

[EE THr]

So far, no real evidence has been presented to show that any LRL is more than just a dowsing device. Furthermore, no real evidence has been presented that dowsing can locate gold or silver, either.

So, the answer to the topic question, is "no."

The only scientifically acceptable proof would be to have a device pass a properly run random double-blind test, and that has never been done, not even with a mere 70% accuracy all that is needed to pass.

The conclusion must be that LRLs are fraudulent, money stealing, scams.

 

[aarthrj3811]

So far, no real evidence has been presented to show that any LRL is more than just a dowsing device. Furthermore, no real evidence has been presented that dowsing can locate gold or silver, either.

So far no real evidence has been presented to show that LRL's are dowsing devices. Farthermore, no real evidence has been presented that Dowsers can not locate gold and silver.Art

 

[EE THr]

Let me "guess" again. 4 Replies about why "we can't do it" or several lame'ish reasons with a side of insult and carl's test for dessert.

SHO-NUFF

It seems that one of the fenix brothers has the challengers on Ignore, and talks to the air about what he thinks we might have said.

What fun.

Another one of them peeks sometimes, and yet another peeks all of the time.

So there must be at least three, but some of them may be duplicating what some of the others do, so there's no way to be sure yet.

You just can't make this stuff up!

It is entertaining, seeing an "adult" act this way.

Must be that mental issue they continuously accuse others of having

I think so. When they come up with some of their sick-o-babble terms, I wonder, "Where did they get that from?" I guess it's from themselves. It even matches what they are doing, sometimes very obviously. Oh well.