Another Strange pewter object…

woody50

Bronze Member
Jun 21, 2007
1,881
206
Detector(s) used
XP Deus
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Another Strange pewter object…

This fragment was found in Holland, the top part was broken off. We wondered what it was, it is from pewter but has figures on both sides of it and both sides have different subjects.
THis fragment is shown below next to the larger complete object.


While trying to find out what it was used for I came across a few others, two of which were complete. One of the complete ones came from the same city and it was found during an archeology dig.

I have now discovered another 5 ‘about the same’ fragments that have been found by our collages.

Here is a photo of most of the objects found, they sort of look alike, pretty sure they were used for the same purpose (but what?). Two of the objects are in the depots from an archeology service; the others are in private collections.

Wondering if anyone knows what it could be.

On a Dutch forum the guesses that people have made ‘what it is’ or ‘what it was used for’ are:

Baby rattle
A belt hanger
A shoe horn
A Spatula
Medical instrument
A soother for a child
Something to fold paper with
Until now none of the above ‘guesses’ can be substantiated.

The measurements of the complete object are:

Material Pewter
Weight 28 gram
Length 110 mm
The widest point 32 mm
The flat part widest point 17 mm
The flat part length from top to the decoration is 44 mm

The object next to the complete one was found in the same city, and has the same decoration and measurement as the complete object.

I do realize that a few have been found in Holland, and my guess is that it could be just a Dutch product. But just maybe something like this exists or existed in England.

The estimate is that the object is from the 16[SUP]th[/SUP] century.
Any guesses are welcome!

Greetings Earl
 

Attachments

  • Final.jpg
    Final.jpg
    289.9 KB · Views: 221
Last edited:
Hey guys! Still waiting for comments on DCMatt's good post. Looking for sometone (besides myself) to agree with his findings. Come on, give your comments on the post, what do you think? Is it possible or not?

Matt: I forgot to mention that I received a photo of a other similar object, it’s shown below. (click on the thumbnail for a large view)
I am not sure that it is another in the series, but what do you think?

It was found in a town called Arnemuiden in Holland, and is dated 'before' 1570, which sort of corresponds to the dates that I had thought for these items.
 

Attachments

  • Vondst uit Arnemuiden.jpg
    Vondst uit Arnemuiden.jpg
    81.3 KB · Views: 86
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Hey guys! Still waiting for comments on DCMatt's good post. Looking for sometone (besides myself) to agree with his findings. Come on, give your comments on the post, what do you think? Is it possible or not?
Matt: I forgot to mention that I received a photo of a other similar object, it’s shown below. (click on the thumbnail for a large view)
I am not sure that it is another in the series, but what do you think?
It was found in a town called Arnemuiden in Holland, and is dated 'before' 1570, which sort of corresponds to the dates that I had thought for these items.

Well still no one who wants to step forward and disagree/agree with Matt? Strange.

Here is a new photo with the most of the finds (less one that I cannot publish).
 

Attachments

  • All together new.jpg
    All together new.jpg
    377.7 KB · Views: 83
Upvote 0
Here are two enlargements of one of the artifacts, which correlates to Matts determination.
On the left half you see what I think represents a seed. The top of the triangle is closed.
On the right side you see what I think is a fetus. The top of the triangle is open.

Comments anyone?
 

Attachments

  • seed and fetus (foetus).jpg
    seed and fetus (foetus).jpg
    66.2 KB · Views: 82
Upvote 0
Hey guys! Still waiting for comments on DCMatt's good post. Looking for sometone (besides myself) to agree with his findings. Come on, give your comments on the post, what do you think? Is it possible or not?

Matt: I forgot to mention that I received a photo of a other similar object, it’s shown below. (click on the thumbnail for a large view)
I am not sure that it is another in the series, but what do you think?

It was found in a town called Arnemuiden in Holland, and is dated 'before' 1570, which sort of corresponds to the dates that I had thought for these items.

VERY interesting that this additional piece has a heart symbol on it and yet it dates to "before" 1570. The heart symbol was not used by the Catholic church until the late 17th C and became the popular symbol of love we know today during the Victorian era.

However, in Roman times there was a plant with a :heart: heart shaped seed pod :heart:called silphium (now extinct) which was used as... wait for it... a CONTRACEPTIVE. It was said to be worth it's weight in gold and made the region in which it was grown very wealthy.

More evidence. Green check please.

DCMatt
 

Upvote 0
VERY interesting that this additional piece has a heart symbol on it and yet it dates to "before" 1570. The heart symbol was not used by the Catholic church until the late 17th C and became the popular symbol of love we know today during the Victorian era.

However, in Roman times there was a plant with a :heart: heart shaped seed pod :heart:called silphium (now extinct) which was used as... wait for it... a CONTRACEPTIVE. It was said to be worth it's weight in gold and made the region in which it was grown very wealthy.

More evidence. Green check please.

DCMatt
Well I never thought it was a heart, more an part of a human (or woman)...
But your information is sure good, it could mean that too. Good research Matt.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top