steveh2112
Jr. Member
- Apr 18, 2015
- 80
- 26
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
i've been reading a lot and thinking a lot about this. i don't have time or money to buy a bunch of sluice boxes and see which one works so i really want to get it right first time if possible, so i hope you guys can help.
me and my wife will be in CA gold country full time between May and Sept. it's obvious that many of the smaller creaks will not have a lot of water.
i want to get to hard to reach places as i hope they will yield better if they haven't been worked over so much. we have a dual sport bike to get up most of the way, then hike the rest.
so we need something compact which rules out a full size conventional sluice like a Keene A52
i'm thinking either Royal folding sluice http://www.amazon.com/Royal-Locking-Folding-Backpack-Sluice/dp/B003DVEHC0 (very easy to pack away but needs pre-classifying) or Sniper Bazooka 36" Sniper Bazooka Gold Trap Sluice Box - Bazooka Gold Company
both are similar price, 36" Bazooka is a bit heavier (9lbs vs. 7.3) and a lot longer (maybe i should look at the small 24 or 30"? but we have 2 people shoveling or hand dredging, what do you think?).
i guess the thing that worries me most about the Bazooka is its very thirsty (i read the Sniper is a bit better than the Prospector for water use), but i suppose i can improve water flow by setting up a dam.
so, in terms of gold capture, how would you compare the two? i assume i could move a lot more material through the Bazooka so even if it looses a bit more fine stuff than the conventional type sluices, its still ahead of the game?
what about cleanout? i haven't seen a video for the cleanout on either of these two yet. any thoughts?
what else am i missing? i know there are many other sluice boxes out there, but i mean something compact enough to backpack and great performance for less than $200
thanks
me and my wife will be in CA gold country full time between May and Sept. it's obvious that many of the smaller creaks will not have a lot of water.
i want to get to hard to reach places as i hope they will yield better if they haven't been worked over so much. we have a dual sport bike to get up most of the way, then hike the rest.
so we need something compact which rules out a full size conventional sluice like a Keene A52
i'm thinking either Royal folding sluice http://www.amazon.com/Royal-Locking-Folding-Backpack-Sluice/dp/B003DVEHC0 (very easy to pack away but needs pre-classifying) or Sniper Bazooka 36" Sniper Bazooka Gold Trap Sluice Box - Bazooka Gold Company
both are similar price, 36" Bazooka is a bit heavier (9lbs vs. 7.3) and a lot longer (maybe i should look at the small 24 or 30"? but we have 2 people shoveling or hand dredging, what do you think?).
i guess the thing that worries me most about the Bazooka is its very thirsty (i read the Sniper is a bit better than the Prospector for water use), but i suppose i can improve water flow by setting up a dam.
so, in terms of gold capture, how would you compare the two? i assume i could move a lot more material through the Bazooka so even if it looses a bit more fine stuff than the conventional type sluices, its still ahead of the game?
what about cleanout? i haven't seen a video for the cleanout on either of these two yet. any thoughts?
what else am i missing? i know there are many other sluice boxes out there, but i mean something compact enough to backpack and great performance for less than $200
thanks
Last edited: