Ancient Vaults, mines and crypts

[HMK959]

Maybe this photo is interesting to you. If you turn the photo to the left, you will see a large face of a young man with his eyes closed and long hair on his forehead. And you see a small old man's face with open eyes and a big nose. And if you turn the photo to the right, you will see a large old man's face with closed eyes and a big nose, and a small young man's face with open eyes and the same long hair on the forehead.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[sdcfia]

I'm not claiming that some of these things can't be used as landmarks. Many can be because they're easily recognizable by most humans. What I am saying is that they are not man made.
Were overseas explorers here in North America in OT days? Yes, I believe there is some intriguing evidence to support that. The North African/Middle Eastern military style ruins on top of Hidden Mountain (on the Rio Puerco in NM) and many non-native petroglyphs also there (including the decalog stone and a star map), plus additional cultural petroglyphs found in the lower Rio Grande Valley of NM are circumstantial evidence of Bronze Age activity in the American Southwest. Those guys didn't shape mountains into faces, but they did build things and carve messages on rocks.

 

[HMK959]

I'm not claiming that some of these things can't be used as landmarks. Many can be because they're easily recognizable by most humans. What I am saying is that they are not man made.
Were overseas explorers here in North America in OT days? Yes, I believe there is some intriguing evidence to support that. The North African/Middle Eastern military style ruins on top of Hidden Mountain (on the Rio Puerco in NM) and many non-native petroglyphs also there (including the decalog stone and a star map), plus additional cultural petroglyphs found in the lower Rio Grande Valley of NM are circumstantial evidence of Bronze Age activity in the American Southwest. Those guys didn't shape mountains into faces, but they did build things and carve messages on rocks.

Yes, at first glance, all people see and recognize, but do they know how to use them?

 

[Crosse De Sign]

I'm not claiming that some of these things can't be used as landmarks. Many can be because they're easily recognizable by most humans. What I am saying is that they are not man made.

Can you prove that nature made them? You are asserting your opinion, not science, no proof either way.
Just because there is no proof at all, can you persuade anyone that you're right with your assumptions?
Possibly, because as you have said, people are often times persuadable, or as you have put it, "Gullible".

So how do you know for sure, you don't. Columbus supposedly sailed unadvisedly, when it was widely
thought the world wasn't round, but square. So where did the knowledge of the now known previous
explorers go? Time passes, & then people have no real knowledge of what had taken place in older
times, but that doesn't mean there's no signs that are left for present time observators to prove or
disprove, in theoretical speculation... And without the scientific research, that's all it is. If it were all
naturally occurring then how did it happen for so many of them to resemble human like features?
If you are right, & no man or Angel, etc. had any part in creating those images, how is it that they
appear like they do? Doesn't it seem quite a bit unexplainably coincedental? What about Petra?

There's always been naysayers that say NO, & then there's often been achievers. Though much
of the Ancient's History has either been hidden, not understood, or not passed on & forgotten,
only the unknown mysterious and unexplained signs remain to be pondered, theorized, & so
speculated on. But when feasable hard evidence is found, it seems the doubters still say "NO".

 

[sdcfia]

I’m not trying to persuade anybody, just presenting a different perspective on a forum. People can believe what they want. As always, my opinions are subject to change, but only for a good reason.

 

[sdcfia]

Yes, at first glance, all people see and recognize, but do they know how to use them?

They may have a use, or they may have no particular use. There’s no way to tell unless there’s additional evidence.

 

[HMK959]

Look at these pictures. Turtle, lion, camel, eagle, frog, rabbit, human face, geometric shapes. ....Which do you consider to be the work of nature?