cactusjumper said:
Bowman,
Not to worry, as there is no word that you might use that I would not understand. That assumes the spelling is somewhere close to correct.
I am
just barely smart enough to be able to use the "Spell Check" below. I use it so others won't mistake the meaning of what I am writing.
Take care,
Joe Ribaudo
,
i don't think your spelling has anything to do with you not being able to read a map or being Rudd ! lol
and what would 200 inches have to do with it ?
back to the topic ...
as far as Ruth goes , is it important what those words meant . maybe ,maybe not . he could have written them years earlier.., could it be Ruth never had the map with him when he came to the Mt's .. he stated he had a map . he did not state he had it on him at the time ...and no map was found where the body was found ....its more logical he never had the map with him at the time ...but if i am right about the location of the mine it ex plans a few facts , like Ruth's body and head were no where near the mine ... that IMHO means who was guiding him was not taking him where he wanted to go.....or Ruth did not trust them ...maybe Ruth was right Look what happen ...
lets get real ... if he was killed why take the head somewhere else . to stop the body from being Id . thats dumb , his teeth were found and the site with all or most of his belongings ...OK we defind animals took the skull where it was found ..if thats excepted logically , than who saw him last , they say they left him in one area , they say ... next , if i was right and there are two wordings of Latin that started with the same two word yet the third word was diffrent would that play a diffrent meaning , yes . it would make one think Ruth had killed him self ....not write he had conqueredcould relate the opposite , in this case defeat...
and maybe he never got the chance to write the last word . , the top was on his thermos, was anything left in it...?
his gun was fully loaded . why not shot a help message ? why not shot him self for that matter if he was at deaths door ...?
no one ever proved Ruth was shot ...and his own gun was unfired ..note the gun was not in the hoster when the picture was taken ....as far as we know at this piont ...as far we know he could have been killed by animals or fallen or was sick and collapsed, that logically could explan a full thremos ...or a unfired firearm..another thing i have not seen yet is any defindment of what body parts were found and where .. why . if his arms were not at the site most likely arms are very easy for animals to brake free from the bodty and drag away thus is the case with the head or skull after a few days ...and in fact could explan more about his death ... most big cats well return to a site for a days if not a week or so ... they stop feeding after the meat starts to rots ... but do return to a kill often over a few days
most comman the legs are not because of size and weight ..also note the torn clouths ...if you leave clouths out side for a few months they dont look like that ...
and besides all of these thoeries . the man could have stacked the belongs like that before moveing the body . thus the site was disterbed before we got to see it ...
the bones were not in the shade ... or near a flat setting stone ...but could have been very easly attacked by a animal in that area ..not being from that area or knowing the animals in that area this could be the cause of his death ...some with a fall . he is out in the open and could have triped and braken a leg or collapsed , that could logically explan his bones being found in the open ,,,