bobm31
Jr. Member
ACE250 In Ground Tests with Coins "on edge"
Today, I did a quick "in ground" experiment with a nickel, then a penny on edge at 4" deep. All I noticed is that I had to scan "faster" to detect them with 4 BARS of SENSITIVITY.
I also did an "in ground" experiment with a pull-tab (that IDed as a pull-tab...I have another pull-tab that IDs as a nickel) in the hole on top of a penny (laying flat)....no problem with pennies, nickel, dimes and quarters. However, with the pull-tab that IDs as a nickel in the hole with a coin. The quarter IDed as a dime and the dime IDed as a penny and the penny IDed just to the left of its icon as did the nickel. All IDed at "normal" sweep speeds.
What I have learned from these expeiments is that if a coiin is "on edge" it may be missed at normal sweep speeds.
Today, I did a quick "in ground" experiment with a nickel, then a penny on edge at 4" deep. All I noticed is that I had to scan "faster" to detect them with 4 BARS of SENSITIVITY.
I also did an "in ground" experiment with a pull-tab (that IDed as a pull-tab...I have another pull-tab that IDs as a nickel) in the hole on top of a penny (laying flat)....no problem with pennies, nickel, dimes and quarters. However, with the pull-tab that IDs as a nickel in the hole with a coin. The quarter IDed as a dime and the dime IDed as a penny and the penny IDed just to the left of its icon as did the nickel. All IDed at "normal" sweep speeds.
What I have learned from these expeiments is that if a coiin is "on edge" it may be missed at normal sweep speeds.
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Upvote
0