Wow, what a crude weapon for the 1940's! I thought the Germans made more sophisticated weapons.Trond said:WOODY50 said:Nice find, from which war do you think this is? (wwI, ww2......?)
This is a ww2 weapon.![]()
WOODY50 said:Wow, what a crude weapon for the 1940's! I thought the Germans made more sophisticated weapons.Trond said:WOODY50 said:Nice find, from which war do you think this is? (wwI, ww2......?)
This is a ww2 weapon.![]()
Thanks
DMN said:Looks like it would be set off remotely. I suppose if you were in a bunker and being attacked you could charge it from the safety of the bunker against the attacker. It's a pretty low-tech and but probably highly effective defensive weapon.
I agree about being a fixed weapon it would not have much use, strange...ivan salis said:humm flame thrower vs flame thrower --- since one of the favorite ways to get rid of a bunker was to use a flame thrower on it and bake / set fire to the folks in it (very ugly --being burnt to a crisp or having your lungs fried by super heated air when you tried to breath )-- as a fixed weapon -- the attackers could see which way it was pointed and unless it was hidden by some means ---- I doubt they would just rush up towards it if they saw the pipes -- boozookas or handgrandes fired or thrown thru the viewing / firing slits of the bunkers as well as "satchel" explosive charges and flame thowers were used to knock out bunkers .--- this weapon while crude --was both simple and if the targets were in range effective I'm sure . ( russian weapons from which this was copied from tended to be simple yet highly lethal)
NHbenz said:Nice find! From what I found online it seems there is supposed to also have a tube on the back end for the pressure cartridge... am I mistaken?