Michigan Badger
Gold Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 6,797
- Reaction score
- 149
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Northern, Michigan
- Detector(s) used
- willow stick
- Primary Interest:
- Other
Willy said:I've done a fair amount of testing over the years & have found that there isn't really all that much difference between many detectors, old & new (not too old though). As long as it can be ground balanced & doesn't have the disc. set too high they're pretty even. This doesn't count for saltwater.. just highly mineralized inland sites. The only detector that I've swung that gave a huge increase in depth is a PI, and that's apples 'n oranges. ...Willy.
This is basically what I've found over my 37 years of THing. While I've not been too concerned about the ground balancing, screens, bells, etc., I have noticed that there's little difference in the quality of MOST HIGHER RANGE machines produced over the last decade or two. In fact, I've used a Wilson Newman GB II (1983 vintage) to find Indian cents at 9 inches deep. I'll bet not many here believe that!
I'm not really a technical person. I judge a detector by what it produces. If I'm digging Barbers, Seated, Bust, Spanish cobs, Civil War relics by the buckets, etc., I don't give a darn if everybody gives the detector thumbs down!?
To me--the proof of a machines worth is in the finds. Paper work and online write-ups are cute, but, in the final analyses, show me the loot!
I'm constantly changing machines but some I hold on to all the time. I hardly dare admit it lest I be stoned but one of my best machines is made in China. Now, I have no special love for China. Heck, I don't trust that country period! But I'll tell you some of that "junk" finds treasure! And to me, that's what really counts.